Loading…
Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S
•Evapotranspiration from rainfed continuous maize and maize and soybean crops in rotation was similar during normal years.•Water use efficiencies were lower in the drought year, mainly due to lower crop yield.•Maize and soybean crops in this region use similar amounts of water over the growing seaso...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agricultural water management 2019-07, Vol.221 (C), p.92-98 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63 |
container_end_page | 98 |
container_issue | C |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Agricultural water management |
container_volume | 221 |
creator | Hussain, Mir Zaman Hamilton, Stephen K. Bhardwaj, Ajay K. Basso, Bruno Thelen, Kurt D. Robertson, G.P. |
description | •Evapotranspiration from rainfed continuous maize and maize and soybean crops in rotation was similar during normal years.•Water use efficiencies were lower in the drought year, mainly due to lower crop yield.•Maize and soybean crops in this region use similar amounts of water over the growing season.\•The relative proportion of maize and soybean crops in watersheds should not affect regional water balances.
This study examined evapotranspiration (ET) from no-till, rainfed maize and soybean during three growing seasons (May-Sep) of normal rainfall years (2009, 2010, 2011) and a drought year (2012) in Michigan, USA, based on daily soil water uptake measured by time-domain reflectometry at multiple depths through the root zone. During normal rainfall years, growing-season ET was similar between continuous maize (mean ± standard deviation: 471 ± 47 mm) and maize in rotation (469 ± 51 mm). During the drought year, ET decreased by only 3% for continuous maize but by 20% for maize in rotation. During the normal rainfall years, ET for soybean (453 ± 34 mm) was statistically indistinguishable from ET for maize, and was lower during the drought year (333 mm). Water use efficiency (WUE), calculated from harvest yield (grain + corn stover) and ET, was 25.3 ± 4.2 kg ha−1 mm-1 for continuous maize and 27.3 ± 3.1 kg ha−1 mm−1 for maize in rotation during the normal rainfall years, whereas WUEs for both continuous maize and maize in rotation were much lower in the 2012 drought year (14.0 and 15.5 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively), coincident with lower production. Soybean had a much lower WUE than maize during the three normal years (6.95 ± 0.96 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the drought year (4.57 kg ha−1 mm−1), also explained by lower yield. Both maize and soybean tended to use all available water in the soil profile; there was no consistent difference in ET between these crops, while yield varied markedly from year to year. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.049 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1511511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S037837741830876X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S037837741830876X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKtP4Ca4nzGXuXXhQqReQHGhXYdMcmJTNBmStNI-vZlWcCccyFn8_8fJh9AlJSUltLlelfLjW6aSETorCStJNTtCE9q1vGCs48doQnjbFbxtq1N0FuOKEFKRqp2g3XwjB5-CdHGwQSbrHZZO40yDgNcRMBhjlQWnttgbrLxL1q39OuIvaXewD_9t0W97kA5bh4NPB1ze0xLwehgy8cXqb4gJL8q3c3Ri5GeEi993ihb38_e7x-L59eHp7va5ULytU8FkTTtqtG5p1_emZqRnRKqOcc176LQ2Na1aqGvJOG0ayXXTqBkYZSSvG9PwKbo6cH1MVkRlE6hl_ocDlQSt6Tg5xA8hFXyMAYwYgv2SYSsoEaNjsRJ7x2J0LAgT2XFu3RxakO_fWAgjPqsCbcNI197-2_8BCSOIkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Hussain, Mir Zaman ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Bhardwaj, Ajay K. ; Basso, Bruno ; Thelen, Kurt D. ; Robertson, G.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Mir Zaman ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Bhardwaj, Ajay K. ; Basso, Bruno ; Thelen, Kurt D. ; Robertson, G.P.</creatorcontrib><description>•Evapotranspiration from rainfed continuous maize and maize and soybean crops in rotation was similar during normal years.•Water use efficiencies were lower in the drought year, mainly due to lower crop yield.•Maize and soybean crops in this region use similar amounts of water over the growing season.\•The relative proportion of maize and soybean crops in watersheds should not affect regional water balances.
This study examined evapotranspiration (ET) from no-till, rainfed maize and soybean during three growing seasons (May-Sep) of normal rainfall years (2009, 2010, 2011) and a drought year (2012) in Michigan, USA, based on daily soil water uptake measured by time-domain reflectometry at multiple depths through the root zone. During normal rainfall years, growing-season ET was similar between continuous maize (mean ± standard deviation: 471 ± 47 mm) and maize in rotation (469 ± 51 mm). During the drought year, ET decreased by only 3% for continuous maize but by 20% for maize in rotation. During the normal rainfall years, ET for soybean (453 ± 34 mm) was statistically indistinguishable from ET for maize, and was lower during the drought year (333 mm). Water use efficiency (WUE), calculated from harvest yield (grain + corn stover) and ET, was 25.3 ± 4.2 kg ha−1 mm-1 for continuous maize and 27.3 ± 3.1 kg ha−1 mm−1 for maize in rotation during the normal rainfall years, whereas WUEs for both continuous maize and maize in rotation were much lower in the 2012 drought year (14.0 and 15.5 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively), coincident with lower production. Soybean had a much lower WUE than maize during the three normal years (6.95 ± 0.96 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the drought year (4.57 kg ha−1 mm−1), also explained by lower yield. Both maize and soybean tended to use all available water in the soil profile; there was no consistent difference in ET between these crops, while yield varied markedly from year to year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Continuous corn ; Corn-soybean rotation ; Daily soil moisture ; Drought years ; Evapotranspiration ; Grain yield ; Leaf area index ; Maximum biomass ; Modeled ET ; No-till ; Normal rainfall years ; Sandy soil ; Stover yield ; Time domain reflectometery ; US Midwest ; Water use-efficiency</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2019-07, Vol.221 (C), p.92-98</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741830876X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1511511$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Mir Zaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Ajay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Kurt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, G.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>•Evapotranspiration from rainfed continuous maize and maize and soybean crops in rotation was similar during normal years.•Water use efficiencies were lower in the drought year, mainly due to lower crop yield.•Maize and soybean crops in this region use similar amounts of water over the growing season.\•The relative proportion of maize and soybean crops in watersheds should not affect regional water balances.
This study examined evapotranspiration (ET) from no-till, rainfed maize and soybean during three growing seasons (May-Sep) of normal rainfall years (2009, 2010, 2011) and a drought year (2012) in Michigan, USA, based on daily soil water uptake measured by time-domain reflectometry at multiple depths through the root zone. During normal rainfall years, growing-season ET was similar between continuous maize (mean ± standard deviation: 471 ± 47 mm) and maize in rotation (469 ± 51 mm). During the drought year, ET decreased by only 3% for continuous maize but by 20% for maize in rotation. During the normal rainfall years, ET for soybean (453 ± 34 mm) was statistically indistinguishable from ET for maize, and was lower during the drought year (333 mm). Water use efficiency (WUE), calculated from harvest yield (grain + corn stover) and ET, was 25.3 ± 4.2 kg ha−1 mm-1 for continuous maize and 27.3 ± 3.1 kg ha−1 mm−1 for maize in rotation during the normal rainfall years, whereas WUEs for both continuous maize and maize in rotation were much lower in the 2012 drought year (14.0 and 15.5 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively), coincident with lower production. Soybean had a much lower WUE than maize during the three normal years (6.95 ± 0.96 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the drought year (4.57 kg ha−1 mm−1), also explained by lower yield. Both maize and soybean tended to use all available water in the soil profile; there was no consistent difference in ET between these crops, while yield varied markedly from year to year.</description><subject>Continuous corn</subject><subject>Corn-soybean rotation</subject><subject>Daily soil moisture</subject><subject>Drought years</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Grain yield</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Maximum biomass</subject><subject>Modeled ET</subject><subject>No-till</subject><subject>Normal rainfall years</subject><subject>Sandy soil</subject><subject>Stover yield</subject><subject>Time domain reflectometery</subject><subject>US Midwest</subject><subject>Water use-efficiency</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKtP4Ca4nzGXuXXhQqReQHGhXYdMcmJTNBmStNI-vZlWcCccyFn8_8fJh9AlJSUltLlelfLjW6aSETorCStJNTtCE9q1vGCs48doQnjbFbxtq1N0FuOKEFKRqp2g3XwjB5-CdHGwQSbrHZZO40yDgNcRMBhjlQWnttgbrLxL1q39OuIvaXewD_9t0W97kA5bh4NPB1ze0xLwehgy8cXqb4gJL8q3c3Ri5GeEi993ihb38_e7x-L59eHp7va5ULytU8FkTTtqtG5p1_emZqRnRKqOcc176LQ2Na1aqGvJOG0ayXXTqBkYZSSvG9PwKbo6cH1MVkRlE6hl_ocDlQSt6Tg5xA8hFXyMAYwYgv2SYSsoEaNjsRJ7x2J0LAgT2XFu3RxakO_fWAgjPqsCbcNI197-2_8BCSOIkg</recordid><startdate>20190720</startdate><enddate>20190720</enddate><creator>Hussain, Mir Zaman</creator><creator>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creator><creator>Bhardwaj, Ajay K.</creator><creator>Basso, Bruno</creator><creator>Thelen, Kurt D.</creator><creator>Robertson, G.P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190720</creationdate><title>Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S</title><author>Hussain, Mir Zaman ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Bhardwaj, Ajay K. ; Basso, Bruno ; Thelen, Kurt D. ; Robertson, G.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Continuous corn</topic><topic>Corn-soybean rotation</topic><topic>Daily soil moisture</topic><topic>Drought years</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Grain yield</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Maximum biomass</topic><topic>Modeled ET</topic><topic>No-till</topic><topic>Normal rainfall years</topic><topic>Sandy soil</topic><topic>Stover yield</topic><topic>Time domain reflectometery</topic><topic>US Midwest</topic><topic>Water use-efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Mir Zaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Ajay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basso, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelen, Kurt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, G.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussain, Mir Zaman</au><au>Hamilton, Stephen K.</au><au>Bhardwaj, Ajay K.</au><au>Basso, Bruno</au><au>Thelen, Kurt D.</au><au>Robertson, G.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2019-07-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>221</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>92-98</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><abstract>•Evapotranspiration from rainfed continuous maize and maize and soybean crops in rotation was similar during normal years.•Water use efficiencies were lower in the drought year, mainly due to lower crop yield.•Maize and soybean crops in this region use similar amounts of water over the growing season.\•The relative proportion of maize and soybean crops in watersheds should not affect regional water balances.
This study examined evapotranspiration (ET) from no-till, rainfed maize and soybean during three growing seasons (May-Sep) of normal rainfall years (2009, 2010, 2011) and a drought year (2012) in Michigan, USA, based on daily soil water uptake measured by time-domain reflectometry at multiple depths through the root zone. During normal rainfall years, growing-season ET was similar between continuous maize (mean ± standard deviation: 471 ± 47 mm) and maize in rotation (469 ± 51 mm). During the drought year, ET decreased by only 3% for continuous maize but by 20% for maize in rotation. During the normal rainfall years, ET for soybean (453 ± 34 mm) was statistically indistinguishable from ET for maize, and was lower during the drought year (333 mm). Water use efficiency (WUE), calculated from harvest yield (grain + corn stover) and ET, was 25.3 ± 4.2 kg ha−1 mm-1 for continuous maize and 27.3 ± 3.1 kg ha−1 mm−1 for maize in rotation during the normal rainfall years, whereas WUEs for both continuous maize and maize in rotation were much lower in the 2012 drought year (14.0 and 15.5 kg ha−1 mm−1, respectively), coincident with lower production. Soybean had a much lower WUE than maize during the three normal years (6.95 ± 0.96 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the drought year (4.57 kg ha−1 mm−1), also explained by lower yield. Both maize and soybean tended to use all available water in the soil profile; there was no consistent difference in ET between these crops, while yield varied markedly from year to year.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.049</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-3774 |
ispartof | Agricultural water management, 2019-07, Vol.221 (C), p.92-98 |
issn | 0378-3774 1873-2283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1511511 |
source | Elsevier; ScienceDirect (Online service) |
subjects | Continuous corn Corn-soybean rotation Daily soil moisture Drought years Evapotranspiration Grain yield Leaf area index Maximum biomass Modeled ET No-till Normal rainfall years Sandy soil Stover yield Time domain reflectometery US Midwest Water use-efficiency |
title | Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of continuous maize and maize and soybean in rotation in the upper Midwest U.S |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evapotranspiration%20and%20water%20use%20efficiency%20of%20continuous%20maize%20and%20maize%20and%20soybean%20in%20rotation%20in%20the%20upper%20Midwest%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Hussain,%20Mir%20Zaman&rft.date=2019-07-20&rft.volume=221&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=92-98&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.049&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES037837741830876X%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a5181fdd718bbf520b20ac823d3be8ddf5147e55a23166a3d66c9efcfa356f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |