Loading…
Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability
Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was develop...
Saved in:
Published in: | Landscape ecology 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483 |
container_end_page | 1218 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1199 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Dale, Virginia H. Kline, Keith L. Parish, Esther S. Eichler, Sarah E. |
description | Context
There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it.
Objectives
The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals.
Methods
The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico.
Results
The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed.
Conclusions
Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2245978291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wiWBvGdh6eJarKQ6rEBtaWYztpSkmKx13070kJEjtWszn36s5h7FrAnQCo7kkAauAgkAPoXHNxwmaiqCTHqhSnbAYoBZdYqXN2QbQBAKUAZkwv-9a2Xd9mlOxHWA9bHyJlacgsUSDKtrb35OwuZLQfka63dbft0uGSnTV2S-Hq987Z--PybfHMV69PL4uHFXcKIXGF3qO3ubVYey2tLOtS1SUG3fjgbY2oal_IOg9aOBRe2qJoFKiyECXmuVZzdjP1DpQ6Q65Lwa3d0PfBJSOK8YmqHKHbCdrF4WsfKJnNsI_9uMtImRdYaYlipOREuTgQxdCYXew-bTwYAeao0UwazajR_Gg0x5CaQjTCfRviX_U_qW9vUHTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2245978291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E. ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Context
There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it.
Objectives
The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals.
Methods
The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico.
Results
The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed.
Conclusions
Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Bioenergy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Indicators ; landscape ; Landscape design ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape sustainability ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Perspective ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Landscape Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2294-1170 ; 0000-0001-9264-6295 ; 0000-0002-9458-3248 ; 0000-0002-4123-7202 ; 0000000192646295 ; 0000000294583248 ; 0000000241237202 ; 0000000322941170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1530076$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Esther S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it.
Objectives
The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals.
Methods
The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico.
Results
The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed.
Conclusions
Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bioenergy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>Landscape design</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape sustainability</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Perspective</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wiWBvGdh6eJarKQ6rEBtaWYztpSkmKx13070kJEjtWszn36s5h7FrAnQCo7kkAauAgkAPoXHNxwmaiqCTHqhSnbAYoBZdYqXN2QbQBAKUAZkwv-9a2Xd9mlOxHWA9bHyJlacgsUSDKtrb35OwuZLQfka63dbft0uGSnTV2S-Hq987Z--PybfHMV69PL4uHFXcKIXGF3qO3ubVYey2tLOtS1SUG3fjgbY2oal_IOg9aOBRe2qJoFKiyECXmuVZzdjP1DpQ6Q65Lwa3d0PfBJSOK8YmqHKHbCdrF4WsfKJnNsI_9uMtImRdYaYlipOREuTgQxdCYXew-bTwYAeao0UwazajR_Gg0x5CaQjTCfRviX_U_qW9vUHTY</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Dale, Virginia H.</creator><creator>Kline, Keith L.</creator><creator>Parish, Esther S.</creator><creator>Eichler, Sarah E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-1170</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-6295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-7202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192646295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000294583248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000241237202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000322941170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><author>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bioenergy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>Landscape design</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape sustainability</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Perspective</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Esther S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dale, Virginia H.</au><au>Kline, Keith L.</au><au>Parish, Esther S.</au><au>Eichler, Sarah E.</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1199</spage><epage>1218</epage><pages>1199-1218</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it.
Objectives
The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals.
Methods
The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico.
Results
The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed.
Conclusions
Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-1170</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-6295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-7202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192646295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000294583248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000241237202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000322941170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530076 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural management Agriculture Bioenergy Biomedical and Life Sciences Ecology Environmental Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Indicators landscape Landscape design Landscape Ecology Landscape sustainability Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life Sciences Nature Conservation Perspective Stakeholders Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Sustainable Development Tradeoffs |
title | Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engaging%20stakeholders%20to%20assess%20landscape%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Dale,%20Virginia%20H.&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab.%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1199&rft.epage=1218&rft.pages=1199-1218&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2245978291%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2245978291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |