Loading…

Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability

Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was develop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Landscape ecology 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218
Main Authors: Dale, Virginia H., Kline, Keith L., Parish, Esther S., Eichler, Sarah E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483
container_end_page 1218
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1199
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 34
creator Dale, Virginia H.
Kline, Keith L.
Parish, Esther S.
Eichler, Sarah E.
description Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Results The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed. Conclusions Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2245978291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wiWBvGdh6eJarKQ6rEBtaWYztpSkmKx13070kJEjtWszn36s5h7FrAnQCo7kkAauAgkAPoXHNxwmaiqCTHqhSnbAYoBZdYqXN2QbQBAKUAZkwv-9a2Xd9mlOxHWA9bHyJlacgsUSDKtrb35OwuZLQfka63dbft0uGSnTV2S-Hq987Z--PybfHMV69PL4uHFXcKIXGF3qO3ubVYey2tLOtS1SUG3fjgbY2oal_IOg9aOBRe2qJoFKiyECXmuVZzdjP1DpQ6Q65Lwa3d0PfBJSOK8YmqHKHbCdrF4WsfKJnNsI_9uMtImRdYaYlipOREuTgQxdCYXew-bTwYAeao0UwazajR_Gg0x5CaQjTCfRviX_U_qW9vUHTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2245978291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E. ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Results The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed. Conclusions Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Bioenergy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Indicators ; landscape ; Landscape design ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape sustainability ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Perspective ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Landscape Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2294-1170 ; 0000-0001-9264-6295 ; 0000-0002-9458-3248 ; 0000-0002-4123-7202 ; 0000000192646295 ; 0000000294583248 ; 0000000241237202 ; 0000000322941170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1530076$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Esther S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Results The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed. Conclusions Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bioenergy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>Landscape design</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape sustainability</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Perspective</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wiWBvGdh6eJarKQ6rEBtaWYztpSkmKx13070kJEjtWszn36s5h7FrAnQCo7kkAauAgkAPoXHNxwmaiqCTHqhSnbAYoBZdYqXN2QbQBAKUAZkwv-9a2Xd9mlOxHWA9bHyJlacgsUSDKtrb35OwuZLQfka63dbft0uGSnTV2S-Hq987Z--PybfHMV69PL4uHFXcKIXGF3qO3ubVYey2tLOtS1SUG3fjgbY2oal_IOg9aOBRe2qJoFKiyECXmuVZzdjP1DpQ6Q65Lwa3d0PfBJSOK8YmqHKHbCdrF4WsfKJnNsI_9uMtImRdYaYlipOREuTgQxdCYXew-bTwYAeao0UwazajR_Gg0x5CaQjTCfRviX_U_qW9vUHTY</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Dale, Virginia H.</creator><creator>Kline, Keith L.</creator><creator>Parish, Esther S.</creator><creator>Eichler, Sarah E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-1170</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-6295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-7202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192646295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000294583248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000241237202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000322941170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</title><author>Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Parish, Esther S. ; Eichler, Sarah E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bioenergy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>Landscape design</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape sustainability</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Perspective</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dale, Virginia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Keith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Esther S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dale, Virginia H.</au><au>Kline, Keith L.</au><au>Parish, Esther S.</au><au>Eichler, Sarah E.</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1199</spage><epage>1218</epage><pages>1199-1218</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context There is widespread consensus about the need for landscape sustainability but little agreement about how to define or measure it. Objectives The aim of the paper is to present a systematic approach for measuring progress toward landscape sustainability goals. Methods The approach was developed based on existing literature and our experiences in applying the approach to support more sustainable agricultural landscapes. Examples applying this approach are summarized for case studies in the United States (U.S.) and Mexico. Results The approach has six steps: the scope and objectives of the assessment are determined based on the particular context; indicators that alert pending concerns are selected and prioritized based on utility and relevance; baselines and targets are established for each indicator, and scenarios for consideration are determined; the indicator values are obtained and evaluated; trends in and tradeoffs among indicator values are analyzed; and good practices are developed, applied, and assessed. Conclusions Insights gained from applying this approach suggest that designing sustainable landscapes depends on stakeholder engagement, effective communication, transparency and trust, timely monitoring, and continual improvement. Iterative application of the assessment approach builds capacity and promotes continual improvements in management practices, thus enabling timely responses to changing conditions while still progressing toward a set of locally defined goals.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-1170</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-6295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-7202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192646295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000294583248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000241237202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000322941170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2973
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1199-1218
issn 0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530076
source Springer Link
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural management
Agriculture
Bioenergy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecology
Environmental Management
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Indicators
landscape
Landscape design
Landscape Ecology
Landscape sustainability
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Life Sciences
Nature Conservation
Perspective
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable Development
Tradeoffs
title Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engaging%20stakeholders%20to%20assess%20landscape%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Dale,%20Virginia%20H.&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab.%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1199&rft.epage=1218&rft.pages=1199-1218&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-019-00848-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2245978291%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-39dd9da4aa9bd82a26b63b69e8fdedab993bd52b4e81c91d2a55f303651694483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2245978291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true