Loading…

Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch

Prior studies of the U.S. electricity sector have recognized the potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by substituting generation from coal-fired units with generation from under-utilized and lower-emitting natural gas-fired units; in fact, this type of “re-dispatch” was invoked as one...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy policy 2018-01, Vol.112 (C), p.34-44
Main Authors: Steinberg, Daniel C., Bielen, David A., Townsend, Aaron
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393
container_end_page 44
container_issue C
container_start_page 34
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 112
creator Steinberg, Daniel C.
Bielen, David A.
Townsend, Aaron
description Prior studies of the U.S. electricity sector have recognized the potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by substituting generation from coal-fired units with generation from under-utilized and lower-emitting natural gas-fired units; in fact, this type of “re-dispatch” was invoked as one of the three building blocks used to set the emissions targets under the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan. Despite the existence of surplus natural gas capacity in the U.S., power system operational constraints not often considered in power sector policy analyses, such as transmission congestion, generator ramping constraints, minimum generation constraints, planned and unplanned generator outages, and ancillary service requirements, could limit the potential and increase the cost of coal-to-gas re-dispatch. Using a highly detailed power system unit commitment and dispatch model, we estimate the maximum potential for re-dispatch in the Eastern Interconnection, which accounts for the majority of coal capacity and generation in the U.S. Under our reference assumptions, we find that maximizing coal-to-gas re-dispatch yields emissions reductions of 230 million metric tons (Mt), or 13% of power sector emissions in the Eastern Interconnection, with a corresponding average abatement cost of $15–$44 per metric ton of CO2, depending on the assumed supply elasticity of natural gas. •A production cost model is used to estimate the potential for coal-to-gas re-dispatch.•Re-dispatch can result in substantial reductions in CO2 emissions at low-cost.•Under maximum re-dispatch the capacity factor of NGCC units exceeds 80% fleet-wide.•Operational constraints only appear to limit re-dispatch over large regions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1549485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421517306262</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0301421517306262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBFws7gnrxLGTAwdUlR8JqRfgahlnQ12lcWS7RbwNz8KT4VDOnHY1mhmNPkIuGeQMmLje5DiMrs8LYDIpOUB5RGaslmUmpJTHZAYlsIwXrDolZyFsAIDXDZ-R1-Ve9zsd7fBO4xrpYlVQ3NoQrBsC9djuTEwvHV3EIVrdUz201LgQqeuS-oGeBjTR-e8vj1lrw6ijWZ-Tk073AS_-7py83C2fFw_Z0-r-cXH7lBkuRMy4rtiblJXRXStYJ00tC8GruhW6rgwWoLHRDBouKtZ2jRFQAwgtEIw2rGzKObk69KZBVgVjI5q1ccOQJilW8YbXVTKVB5PxLgSPnRq93Wr_qRioiZ_aqF9-auI3iYlfSt0cUpj27y36qR4Hg631U3vr7L_5HzCVe1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Steinberg, Daniel C. ; Bielen, David A. ; Townsend, Aaron</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Daniel C. ; Bielen, David A. ; Townsend, Aaron</creatorcontrib><description>Prior studies of the U.S. electricity sector have recognized the potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by substituting generation from coal-fired units with generation from under-utilized and lower-emitting natural gas-fired units; in fact, this type of “re-dispatch” was invoked as one of the three building blocks used to set the emissions targets under the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan. Despite the existence of surplus natural gas capacity in the U.S., power system operational constraints not often considered in power sector policy analyses, such as transmission congestion, generator ramping constraints, minimum generation constraints, planned and unplanned generator outages, and ancillary service requirements, could limit the potential and increase the cost of coal-to-gas re-dispatch. Using a highly detailed power system unit commitment and dispatch model, we estimate the maximum potential for re-dispatch in the Eastern Interconnection, which accounts for the majority of coal capacity and generation in the U.S. Under our reference assumptions, we find that maximizing coal-to-gas re-dispatch yields emissions reductions of 230 million metric tons (Mt), or 13% of power sector emissions in the Eastern Interconnection, with a corresponding average abatement cost of $15–$44 per metric ton of CO2, depending on the assumed supply elasticity of natural gas. •A production cost model is used to estimate the potential for coal-to-gas re-dispatch.•Re-dispatch can result in substantial reductions in CO2 emissions at low-cost.•Under maximum re-dispatch the capacity factor of NGCC units exceeds 80% fleet-wide.•Operational constraints only appear to limit re-dispatch over large regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate change mitigation ; Electricity ; Energy modeling ; Natural gas</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2018-01, Vol.112 (C), p.34-44</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1549485$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielen, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Aaron</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Prior studies of the U.S. electricity sector have recognized the potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by substituting generation from coal-fired units with generation from under-utilized and lower-emitting natural gas-fired units; in fact, this type of “re-dispatch” was invoked as one of the three building blocks used to set the emissions targets under the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan. Despite the existence of surplus natural gas capacity in the U.S., power system operational constraints not often considered in power sector policy analyses, such as transmission congestion, generator ramping constraints, minimum generation constraints, planned and unplanned generator outages, and ancillary service requirements, could limit the potential and increase the cost of coal-to-gas re-dispatch. Using a highly detailed power system unit commitment and dispatch model, we estimate the maximum potential for re-dispatch in the Eastern Interconnection, which accounts for the majority of coal capacity and generation in the U.S. Under our reference assumptions, we find that maximizing coal-to-gas re-dispatch yields emissions reductions of 230 million metric tons (Mt), or 13% of power sector emissions in the Eastern Interconnection, with a corresponding average abatement cost of $15–$44 per metric ton of CO2, depending on the assumed supply elasticity of natural gas. •A production cost model is used to estimate the potential for coal-to-gas re-dispatch.•Re-dispatch can result in substantial reductions in CO2 emissions at low-cost.•Under maximum re-dispatch the capacity factor of NGCC units exceeds 80% fleet-wide.•Operational constraints only appear to limit re-dispatch over large regions.</description><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy modeling</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBFws7gnrxLGTAwdUlR8JqRfgahlnQ12lcWS7RbwNz8KT4VDOnHY1mhmNPkIuGeQMmLje5DiMrs8LYDIpOUB5RGaslmUmpJTHZAYlsIwXrDolZyFsAIDXDZ-R1-Ve9zsd7fBO4xrpYlVQ3NoQrBsC9djuTEwvHV3EIVrdUz201LgQqeuS-oGeBjTR-e8vj1lrw6ijWZ-Tk073AS_-7py83C2fFw_Z0-r-cXH7lBkuRMy4rtiblJXRXStYJ00tC8GruhW6rgwWoLHRDBouKtZ2jRFQAwgtEIw2rGzKObk69KZBVgVjI5q1ccOQJilW8YbXVTKVB5PxLgSPnRq93Wr_qRioiZ_aqF9-auI3iYlfSt0cUpj27y36qR4Hg631U3vr7L_5HzCVe1M</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Steinberg, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Bielen, David A.</creator><creator>Townsend, Aaron</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch</title><author>Steinberg, Daniel C. ; Bielen, David A. ; Townsend, Aaron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy modeling</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielen, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, Aaron</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinberg, Daniel C.</au><au>Bielen, David A.</au><au>Townsend, Aaron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>34-44</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Prior studies of the U.S. electricity sector have recognized the potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by substituting generation from coal-fired units with generation from under-utilized and lower-emitting natural gas-fired units; in fact, this type of “re-dispatch” was invoked as one of the three building blocks used to set the emissions targets under the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan. Despite the existence of surplus natural gas capacity in the U.S., power system operational constraints not often considered in power sector policy analyses, such as transmission congestion, generator ramping constraints, minimum generation constraints, planned and unplanned generator outages, and ancillary service requirements, could limit the potential and increase the cost of coal-to-gas re-dispatch. Using a highly detailed power system unit commitment and dispatch model, we estimate the maximum potential for re-dispatch in the Eastern Interconnection, which accounts for the majority of coal capacity and generation in the U.S. Under our reference assumptions, we find that maximizing coal-to-gas re-dispatch yields emissions reductions of 230 million metric tons (Mt), or 13% of power sector emissions in the Eastern Interconnection, with a corresponding average abatement cost of $15–$44 per metric ton of CO2, depending on the assumed supply elasticity of natural gas. •A production cost model is used to estimate the potential for coal-to-gas re-dispatch.•Re-dispatch can result in substantial reductions in CO2 emissions at low-cost.•Under maximum re-dispatch the capacity factor of NGCC units exceeds 80% fleet-wide.•Operational constraints only appear to limit re-dispatch over large regions.</abstract><cop>United Kingdom</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2018-01, Vol.112 (C), p.34-44
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1549485
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Climate change mitigation
Electricity
Energy modeling
Natural gas
title Evaluating the CO2 emissions reduction potential and cost of power sector re-dispatch
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A37%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20CO2%20emissions%20reduction%20potential%20and%20cost%20of%20power%20sector%C2%A0re-dispatch&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Steinberg,%20Daniel%20C.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=34-44&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.003&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES0301421517306262%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a51b775cafd61f7c8726458d6a85ce20ae9a1094651df9c608006a6e0cac1393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true