The KLIWAS North Sea Climatology. Part II: Assessment against Global Reanalyses

• Published in: Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2018-01, Vol.35 (1), p.127-145
• Main Authors: Schade, Nils H., Sadikni, Remon, Jahnke-Bornemann, Annika, Hinrichs, Iris, Gates, Lydia, Tinz, Birger, Stammer, Detlef
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air temperature; Archives & records; Atmospheric models; Climate; Climate change; Climate models; Climate variability; Climatology; Coastal zone; Computer centers; Datasets; Engineering; Environmental assessment; Evaluation; Intercomparison; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Navigation; Ocean models; Oceans; Quality assessment; Regions; Satellites; Sea level; Sea level pressure; Studies; Temperature; Trends; Water temperature; Winter
• ISSN: 0739-0572; 1520-0426
• DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0045.1

Observational reference datasets are needed in atmosphere and ocean for quality assessments of climate models and for the evaluation of atmospheric reanalyses. To meet this demand on the regional scale, the Climate Water Navigation (KLIWAS) North Sea climatology (KNSC) was developed. This paper uses KNSC to assess the quality of five atmospheric reanalysis products [ERA-40; ERA-Interim; NCEP-1; 20CR, version 2 (20CRv2); and MERRA] over the North Sea from 1979 to 2001. Differences in sea level pressure (2-m air temperature) can be found in coastal regions for ERA-40/ERA-Interim and MERRA, and are more pronounced during positive (negative) phases of the NAO. 20CRv2 shows biases over the entire North Sea and all seasons of several hectopascals. ERA-40 and ERA-Interim show a negative 2-m air temperature bias relative to KNSC along the coastal mainland of Europe, especially during winter months, possibly a result of a remaining land influence. Mean differences result from winter and fall, mostly remaining within measurement uncertainties. Despite the upgrades in the model setup, ERA-Interim shows negligible differences from ERA-40. 20CRv2 and MERRA show positive (negative) biases during the summer (winter) half year. NCEP-1 follows ERA-40/ERA-Interim but mostly with slightly higher differences. All five reanalyses reproduce the decadal variability and climate shift signals present in KNSC fields. Overall, only 20CRv2 has to be considered as clearly unsatisfactorily regarding biases, MAE, and RMSE compared to all other datasets investigated. This study suggests that similar intercomparison studies, performed over other parts of the world’s oceans, especially coastal regions, can be very helpful in identifying shortcomings in atmospheric reanalysis products.