Loading…

Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617

Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International journal of pressure vessels and piping 2019-12, Vol.178 (C), p.103997, Article 103997
Main Authors: Messner, M.C., Phan, V.-T., Sham, T.-L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page 103997
container_title The International journal of pressure vessels and piping
container_volume 178
creator Messner, M.C.
Phan, V.-T.
Sham, T.-L.
description Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic deformation are not separable hence requiring a unified treatment with a viscoplastic model. Several bounding design methods in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B assume a decoupled treatment of creep and plasticity so establishing the boundary of the rate insensitive regimes for advanced reactor structural materials is necessary to set limits for the use of these bounding design methods. In the rate sensitive regime new bounding methods or fully inelastic analysis are required for the design of Division 5 Class A components. During temperature transients these components may operate in both the rate insensitive and rate sensitive regions, requiring computational models that can represent both types of behavior. This work establishes criteria for material rate sensitivity and develops a new composite method for modeling constitutive response in both the rate sensitive and rate insensitive regimes for three Division 5, Class A materials: 316H austenitic stainless steel, Grade 91 ferritic-martensitic steel, and Alloy 617, a nickel-based alloy. Both the criteria and new modeling strategy apply the concept of a normalized activation energy for thermally activated mechanisms developed by Kocks, Mecking, and co-workers. This work quantifies the average rate sensitivity of the three materials from an experimental database collected from the literature. Additionally, this work develops rate sensitivity criteria and a complete model for each material that can transition between both deformation regimes and provides several example simulations demonstrating the accuracy of the models and the numerical performance of the composite modeling method. •Model for the rate sensitivity of several metal alloys developed.•Bounds on the rate sensitive regime for each material determined.•Inelastic model captures the transition from rate-sensitive to -insensitive response.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103997
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1599163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308016117302508</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0308016117302508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJvg9VqTps2H4MUYcxMG3uh1yNJTTenakWSF_Xvb1WuvDjl534fDg9AjJSkllD_XqauP_THNCFXDhiklrtCMSqESVuT0Gs0IIzIZovQW3YVQE0IFKfgMuXVvmpOJrv3Gpi3xoSuhGR_eRMAB2uCi6108Y9diU_amtVBiD8bGzuMQ_cnGkzcNPgx570wTXjCjfLvAG59iRRcX6pJTcY9uquEbHv7mHH29rT9X22T3sXlfLXeJZaKISZ5xJRkI4AbKLMtyQyqy50LmXKlSyr0tpcoMKLmXVlSG29wWTDEmKBNMAZujp4nbheh0sC6C_bFd24KNmhZKUc6GEJtC1ncheKj00buD8WdNiR6V6lpflOpRqZ6UDq3XqQXD_b0DP-JhNOL8SC8792__F77dfvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Messner, M.C. ; Phan, V.-T. ; Sham, T.-L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Messner, M.C. ; Phan, V.-T. ; Sham, T.-L. ; Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic deformation are not separable hence requiring a unified treatment with a viscoplastic model. Several bounding design methods in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B assume a decoupled treatment of creep and plasticity so establishing the boundary of the rate insensitive regimes for advanced reactor structural materials is necessary to set limits for the use of these bounding design methods. In the rate sensitive regime new bounding methods or fully inelastic analysis are required for the design of Division 5 Class A components. During temperature transients these components may operate in both the rate insensitive and rate sensitive regions, requiring computational models that can represent both types of behavior. This work establishes criteria for material rate sensitivity and develops a new composite method for modeling constitutive response in both the rate sensitive and rate insensitive regimes for three Division 5, Class A materials: 316H austenitic stainless steel, Grade 91 ferritic-martensitic steel, and Alloy 617, a nickel-based alloy. Both the criteria and new modeling strategy apply the concept of a normalized activation energy for thermally activated mechanisms developed by Kocks, Mecking, and co-workers. This work quantifies the average rate sensitivity of the three materials from an experimental database collected from the literature. Additionally, this work develops rate sensitivity criteria and a complete model for each material that can transition between both deformation regimes and provides several example simulations demonstrating the accuracy of the models and the numerical performance of the composite modeling method. •Model for the rate sensitivity of several metal alloys developed.•Bounds on the rate sensitive regime for each material determined.•Inelastic model captures the transition from rate-sensitive to -insensitive response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>High temperature materials ; Inelastic modeling ; MATERIALS SCIENCE ; Rate sensitivity</subject><ispartof>The International journal of pressure vessels and piping, 2019-12, Vol.178 (C), p.103997, Article 103997</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4510-6234 ; 0000-0002-0040-4385 ; 0000000200404385 ; 0000000245106234</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1599163$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Messner, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, V.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sham, T.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617</title><title>The International journal of pressure vessels and piping</title><description>Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic deformation are not separable hence requiring a unified treatment with a viscoplastic model. Several bounding design methods in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B assume a decoupled treatment of creep and plasticity so establishing the boundary of the rate insensitive regimes for advanced reactor structural materials is necessary to set limits for the use of these bounding design methods. In the rate sensitive regime new bounding methods or fully inelastic analysis are required for the design of Division 5 Class A components. During temperature transients these components may operate in both the rate insensitive and rate sensitive regions, requiring computational models that can represent both types of behavior. This work establishes criteria for material rate sensitivity and develops a new composite method for modeling constitutive response in both the rate sensitive and rate insensitive regimes for three Division 5, Class A materials: 316H austenitic stainless steel, Grade 91 ferritic-martensitic steel, and Alloy 617, a nickel-based alloy. Both the criteria and new modeling strategy apply the concept of a normalized activation energy for thermally activated mechanisms developed by Kocks, Mecking, and co-workers. This work quantifies the average rate sensitivity of the three materials from an experimental database collected from the literature. Additionally, this work develops rate sensitivity criteria and a complete model for each material that can transition between both deformation regimes and provides several example simulations demonstrating the accuracy of the models and the numerical performance of the composite modeling method. •Model for the rate sensitivity of several metal alloys developed.•Bounds on the rate sensitive regime for each material determined.•Inelastic model captures the transition from rate-sensitive to -insensitive response.</description><subject>High temperature materials</subject><subject>Inelastic modeling</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>Rate sensitivity</subject><issn>0308-0161</issn><issn>1879-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKe_wJvg9VqTps2H4MUYcxMG3uh1yNJTTenakWSF_Xvb1WuvDjl534fDg9AjJSkllD_XqauP_THNCFXDhiklrtCMSqESVuT0Gs0IIzIZovQW3YVQE0IFKfgMuXVvmpOJrv3Gpi3xoSuhGR_eRMAB2uCi6108Y9diU_amtVBiD8bGzuMQ_cnGkzcNPgx570wTXjCjfLvAG59iRRcX6pJTcY9uquEbHv7mHH29rT9X22T3sXlfLXeJZaKISZ5xJRkI4AbKLMtyQyqy50LmXKlSyr0tpcoMKLmXVlSG29wWTDEmKBNMAZujp4nbheh0sC6C_bFd24KNmhZKUc6GEJtC1ncheKj00buD8WdNiR6V6lpflOpRqZ6UDq3XqQXD_b0DP-JhNOL8SC8792__F77dfvQ</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Messner, M.C.</creator><creator>Phan, V.-T.</creator><creator>Sham, T.-L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-4385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000200404385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000245106234</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617</title><author>Messner, M.C. ; Phan, V.-T. ; Sham, T.-L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>High temperature materials</topic><topic>Inelastic modeling</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><topic>Rate sensitivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Messner, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, V.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sham, T.-L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The International journal of pressure vessels and piping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Messner, M.C.</au><au>Phan, V.-T.</au><au>Sham, T.-L.</au><aucorp>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of pressure vessels and piping</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>103997</spage><pages>103997-</pages><artnum>103997</artnum><issn>0308-0161</issn><eissn>1879-3541</eissn><abstract>Advanced reactor systems operate at high temperatures to achieve better thermal efficiency. During transients from lower temperatures to high operating temperatures structural metals transition from rate insensitive behavior to rate dependent behavior. In the rate dependent regime creep and plastic deformation are not separable hence requiring a unified treatment with a viscoplastic model. Several bounding design methods in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B assume a decoupled treatment of creep and plasticity so establishing the boundary of the rate insensitive regimes for advanced reactor structural materials is necessary to set limits for the use of these bounding design methods. In the rate sensitive regime new bounding methods or fully inelastic analysis are required for the design of Division 5 Class A components. During temperature transients these components may operate in both the rate insensitive and rate sensitive regions, requiring computational models that can represent both types of behavior. This work establishes criteria for material rate sensitivity and develops a new composite method for modeling constitutive response in both the rate sensitive and rate insensitive regimes for three Division 5, Class A materials: 316H austenitic stainless steel, Grade 91 ferritic-martensitic steel, and Alloy 617, a nickel-based alloy. Both the criteria and new modeling strategy apply the concept of a normalized activation energy for thermally activated mechanisms developed by Kocks, Mecking, and co-workers. This work quantifies the average rate sensitivity of the three materials from an experimental database collected from the literature. Additionally, this work develops rate sensitivity criteria and a complete model for each material that can transition between both deformation regimes and provides several example simulations demonstrating the accuracy of the models and the numerical performance of the composite modeling method. •Model for the rate sensitivity of several metal alloys developed.•Bounds on the rate sensitive regime for each material determined.•Inelastic model captures the transition from rate-sensitive to -insensitive response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103997</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-4385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000200404385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000245106234</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0161
ispartof The International journal of pressure vessels and piping, 2019-12, Vol.178 (C), p.103997, Article 103997
issn 0308-0161
1879-3541
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1599163
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects High temperature materials
Inelastic modeling
MATERIALS SCIENCE
Rate sensitivity
title Evaluating and modeling rate sensitivity in advanced reactor structural materials: 316H, Gr. 91, and A617
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20and%20modeling%20rate%20sensitivity%20in%20advanced%20reactor%20structural%20materials:%20316H,%20Gr.%2091,%20and%20A617&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20pressure%20vessels%20and%20piping&rft.au=Messner,%20M.C.&rft.aucorp=Argonne%20National%20Lab.%20(ANL),%20Argonne,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=103997&rft.pages=103997-&rft.artnum=103997&rft.issn=0308-0161&rft.eissn=1879-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.103997&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES0308016117302508%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-426983e7e6aed2224a0f0b6784699d88bcd892ae98b8c7fa6c4c53933713739e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true