Loading…

Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution

Micro-Encapsulated CO2 Sorbents (MECS) are a promising technology for post-combustion carbon capture because they enable slow-reacting solvents like carbonate solution to compete with traditional amine solvents. Before scaling up MECS for pilot testing, modeling is needed to design a MECS absorber a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied energy 2018-11, Vol.235 (C)
Main Authors: Hornbostel, K., Nguyen, D., Bourcier, W., Knipe, J., Worthington, M., McCoy, S., Stolaroff, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 235
creator Hornbostel, K.
Nguyen, D.
Bourcier, W.
Knipe, J.
Worthington, M.
McCoy, S.
Stolaroff, J.
description Micro-Encapsulated CO2 Sorbents (MECS) are a promising technology for post-combustion carbon capture because they enable slow-reacting solvents like carbonate solution to compete with traditional amine solvents. Before scaling up MECS for pilot testing, modeling is needed to design a MECS absorber and quantify its size and energy penalty. To that end, a multi-scale model for MECS- that ranges from a single capsule to a 500 MWe power plant absorber- is developed and presented here in this paper. First, the individual capsule model is developed and fitted to experimental CO2 absorption data collected on a 0.1 g sample of capsules filled with sodium carbonate solution. This capsule model is then validated against data collected on a 25 g batch of capsules exposed to flue gas conditions in a fluidized column. This model is then scaled up to represent two absorber designs: a multi-stage, counter-flow fluidized bed and a hollow, cylindrical packed bed with radial gas flow. These two absorber bed models are first optimized for a 1 MWe pilot-scale absorber, and then optimized for a 500 MWe coal plant. This model predicts absorbers of similar dimensions and smaller energy penalties than previously modeled absorbers filled with amine solvent capsules. Furthermore, it is demonstrated here that a few reasonable improvements to capsule design would result in absorber sizes and energy penalties lower than those of a benchmark amine solvent tower. These results demonstrate that micro-encapsulated carbonate solution can compete with faster-acting amine solvents for post-combustion carbon capture.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1601565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1601565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_16015653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sKwjAUBYMoWB__ENwXkpbWdi2KSxfuJU1SezXNlTwQ_Hoj9ANcDWeYMyMZb_ZF3nLezEnGSlbnRc3bJVl5_2CMFbxgGcGLkE-tqLCK9iaCgk9a3c90Hl2nHR1RaQP2Tnt0VArXoU14heg0fUMY6AjSYa5tkj4aEdLZo4I4TnUySZgYAO2GLHphvN5OXJPd6Xg9nHP0AW5eQtBykGitluHGa8aruir_ir5ywEx7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hornbostel, K. ; Nguyen, D. ; Bourcier, W. ; Knipe, J. ; Worthington, M. ; McCoy, S. ; Stolaroff, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hornbostel, K. ; Nguyen, D. ; Bourcier, W. ; Knipe, J. ; Worthington, M. ; McCoy, S. ; Stolaroff, J. ; Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Micro-Encapsulated CO2 Sorbents (MECS) are a promising technology for post-combustion carbon capture because they enable slow-reacting solvents like carbonate solution to compete with traditional amine solvents. Before scaling up MECS for pilot testing, modeling is needed to design a MECS absorber and quantify its size and energy penalty. To that end, a multi-scale model for MECS- that ranges from a single capsule to a 500 MWe power plant absorber- is developed and presented here in this paper. First, the individual capsule model is developed and fitted to experimental CO2 absorption data collected on a 0.1 g sample of capsules filled with sodium carbonate solution. This capsule model is then validated against data collected on a 25 g batch of capsules exposed to flue gas conditions in a fluidized column. This model is then scaled up to represent two absorber designs: a multi-stage, counter-flow fluidized bed and a hollow, cylindrical packed bed with radial gas flow. These two absorber bed models are first optimized for a 1 MWe pilot-scale absorber, and then optimized for a 500 MWe coal plant. This model predicts absorbers of similar dimensions and smaller energy penalties than previously modeled absorbers filled with amine solvent capsules. Furthermore, it is demonstrated here that a few reasonable improvements to capsule design would result in absorber sizes and energy penalties lower than those of a benchmark amine solvent tower. These results demonstrate that micro-encapsulated carbonate solution can compete with faster-acting amine solvents for post-combustion carbon capture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier</publisher><subject>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS ; Carbon capture absorber modeling ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Micro-encapsulated CO2 sorbents ; Packed and fluidized bed modeling ; Post-combustion carbon capture ; Sodium carbonate solvent</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2018-11, Vol.235 (C)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1601565$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hornbostel, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourcier, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knipe, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolaroff, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>Micro-Encapsulated CO2 Sorbents (MECS) are a promising technology for post-combustion carbon capture because they enable slow-reacting solvents like carbonate solution to compete with traditional amine solvents. Before scaling up MECS for pilot testing, modeling is needed to design a MECS absorber and quantify its size and energy penalty. To that end, a multi-scale model for MECS- that ranges from a single capsule to a 500 MWe power plant absorber- is developed and presented here in this paper. First, the individual capsule model is developed and fitted to experimental CO2 absorption data collected on a 0.1 g sample of capsules filled with sodium carbonate solution. This capsule model is then validated against data collected on a 25 g batch of capsules exposed to flue gas conditions in a fluidized column. This model is then scaled up to represent two absorber designs: a multi-stage, counter-flow fluidized bed and a hollow, cylindrical packed bed with radial gas flow. These two absorber bed models are first optimized for a 1 MWe pilot-scale absorber, and then optimized for a 500 MWe coal plant. This model predicts absorbers of similar dimensions and smaller energy penalties than previously modeled absorbers filled with amine solvent capsules. Furthermore, it is demonstrated here that a few reasonable improvements to capsule design would result in absorber sizes and energy penalties lower than those of a benchmark amine solvent tower. These results demonstrate that micro-encapsulated carbonate solution can compete with faster-acting amine solvents for post-combustion carbon capture.</description><subject>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</subject><subject>Carbon capture absorber modeling</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Micro-encapsulated CO2 sorbents</subject><subject>Packed and fluidized bed modeling</subject><subject>Post-combustion carbon capture</subject><subject>Sodium carbonate solvent</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi8sKwjAUBYMoWB__ENwXkpbWdi2KSxfuJU1SezXNlTwQ_Hoj9ANcDWeYMyMZb_ZF3nLezEnGSlbnRc3bJVl5_2CMFbxgGcGLkE-tqLCK9iaCgk9a3c90Hl2nHR1RaQP2Tnt0VArXoU14heg0fUMY6AjSYa5tkj4aEdLZo4I4TnUySZgYAO2GLHphvN5OXJPd6Xg9nHP0AW5eQtBykGitluHGa8aruir_ir5ywEx7</recordid><startdate>20181120</startdate><enddate>20181120</enddate><creator>Hornbostel, K.</creator><creator>Nguyen, D.</creator><creator>Bourcier, W.</creator><creator>Knipe, J.</creator><creator>Worthington, M.</creator><creator>McCoy, S.</creator><creator>Stolaroff, J.</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181120</creationdate><title>Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution</title><author>Hornbostel, K. ; Nguyen, D. ; Bourcier, W. ; Knipe, J. ; Worthington, M. ; McCoy, S. ; Stolaroff, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_16015653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</topic><topic>Carbon capture absorber modeling</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Micro-encapsulated CO2 sorbents</topic><topic>Packed and fluidized bed modeling</topic><topic>Post-combustion carbon capture</topic><topic>Sodium carbonate solvent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hornbostel, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourcier, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knipe, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolaroff, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hornbostel, K.</au><au>Nguyen, D.</au><au>Bourcier, W.</au><au>Knipe, J.</au><au>Worthington, M.</au><au>McCoy, S.</au><au>Stolaroff, J.</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2018-11-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>235</volume><issue>C</issue><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>Micro-Encapsulated CO2 Sorbents (MECS) are a promising technology for post-combustion carbon capture because they enable slow-reacting solvents like carbonate solution to compete with traditional amine solvents. Before scaling up MECS for pilot testing, modeling is needed to design a MECS absorber and quantify its size and energy penalty. To that end, a multi-scale model for MECS- that ranges from a single capsule to a 500 MWe power plant absorber- is developed and presented here in this paper. First, the individual capsule model is developed and fitted to experimental CO2 absorption data collected on a 0.1 g sample of capsules filled with sodium carbonate solution. This capsule model is then validated against data collected on a 25 g batch of capsules exposed to flue gas conditions in a fluidized column. This model is then scaled up to represent two absorber designs: a multi-stage, counter-flow fluidized bed and a hollow, cylindrical packed bed with radial gas flow. These two absorber bed models are first optimized for a 1 MWe pilot-scale absorber, and then optimized for a 500 MWe coal plant. This model predicts absorbers of similar dimensions and smaller energy penalties than previously modeled absorbers filled with amine solvent capsules. Furthermore, it is demonstrated here that a few reasonable improvements to capsule design would result in absorber sizes and energy penalties lower than those of a benchmark amine solvent tower. These results demonstrate that micro-encapsulated carbonate solution can compete with faster-acting amine solvents for post-combustion carbon capture.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2018-11, Vol.235 (C)
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1601565
source Elsevier
subjects 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
Carbon capture absorber modeling
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Micro-encapsulated CO2 sorbents
Packed and fluidized bed modeling
Post-combustion carbon capture
Sodium carbonate solvent
title Packed and fluidized bed absorber modeling for carbon capture with micro-encapsulated sodium carbonate solution
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A57%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Packed%20and%20fluidized%20bed%20absorber%20modeling%20for%20carbon%20capture%20with%20micro-encapsulated%20sodium%20carbonate%20solution&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Hornbostel,%20K.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Lab.%20(LLNL),%20Livermore,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-11-20&rft.volume=235&rft.issue=C&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1601565%3C/osti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_16015653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true