Loading…

Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production

We use a modern Earth system model to approximate the relative importance of ice versus temperature on Arctic marine ecosystem dynamics. We show that while the model adequately simulates ice volume, water temperature, air‐sea CO2 flux, and annual primary production in the Arctic, itunderestimates up...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a
Main Authors: Gibson, Georgina, Weijer, Wilbert, Jeffery, Nicole, Wang, Shanlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 125
creator Gibson, Georgina
Weijer, Wilbert
Jeffery, Nicole
Wang, Shanlin
description We use a modern Earth system model to approximate the relative importance of ice versus temperature on Arctic marine ecosystem dynamics. We show that while the model adequately simulates ice volume, water temperature, air‐sea CO2 flux, and annual primary production in the Arctic, itunderestimates upper water column nitrate across the region. This nitrate bias is likely responsible for the apparent underestimation of ice algae production. Despite this shortcoming, the model appears to be a useful tool for exploring the impacts of environmental change on phytoplankton production and carbon dynamics over the Arctic Ocean. Our experiments indicate that under a warmer climate scenario, the percentage of ocean warming that could be apportioned to a reduction in ice area ranged from 11% to 100%, while decreasing ice area could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production. The change to CO2 air‐sea flux in response to ice and temperature changes averaged an Arctic‐wide 5.5 Tg C yr−1 (3.5%) increase, into the ocean. This increased carbon sink may be short‐lived, as ice cover continues to decrease and the ocean warms. The change in carbon fixation from phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude larger than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering changes to the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of ice dynamics in controlling ocean warming and production and thus the need for well‐behaved ice and BGC models within Earth system models if we hope to accurately predict Arctic changes. Plain Language Summary Through their impacts on water temperature and sea ice cover, changes to the global climate system are likely to have large implications for Arctic marine ecosystems and consequently for Arctic marine production and the carbon cycle. Here we performed a series of experiments with a modern Earth system model to determine the relative importance of ice and temperature for annual net primary production and air‐sea CO2 flux across the Arctic Ocean. We compared model estimates from a validated baseline run to estimates from a model that had been driven with a warmer atmosphere and to projections from a model that had artificially reduced sea ice. Our experiments indicate that as the climate warms, the loss of ice cover will have a larger impact on ocean temperature and primary production th
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JG005343
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1660596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427460226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKo7HyDo1mouc8uyFB1b6oVa1yHNnNgp7WRMMkrf3pQRceXZnMPHx8_hR-iCkhtKmLhlhIpZSUjKE36EBoxmYlSIjB7_3ik_Refeb0icIiJKB-hpAVsV6k_A012rdMDW4FdQeKoBq6bCS9i14FToHODJWjXv4LFt8NjpUGv8qFzdAH5xtuoisM0ZOjFq6-H8Zw_R2_3dcvIwmj-X08l4PlIJL8RopbUyVOcqT5mugFBqVkYQvdIZSZUCxoqcpoYzJhgjVcUMEanOK04zFQnwIbrsc60PtfS6DqDX2jYN6CBpFlNEFqWrXmqd_ejAB7mxnWviX5IlLE8ywtjBuu4t7az3DoxsXb1Tbi8pkYdm5d9mo857_avewv5fV87KRRm7zwX_BlZJd7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427460226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gibson, Georgina ; Weijer, Wilbert ; Jeffery, Nicole ; Wang, Shanlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Georgina ; Weijer, Wilbert ; Jeffery, Nicole ; Wang, Shanlin ; Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>We use a modern Earth system model to approximate the relative importance of ice versus temperature on Arctic marine ecosystem dynamics. We show that while the model adequately simulates ice volume, water temperature, air‐sea CO2 flux, and annual primary production in the Arctic, itunderestimates upper water column nitrate across the region. This nitrate bias is likely responsible for the apparent underestimation of ice algae production. Despite this shortcoming, the model appears to be a useful tool for exploring the impacts of environmental change on phytoplankton production and carbon dynamics over the Arctic Ocean. Our experiments indicate that under a warmer climate scenario, the percentage of ocean warming that could be apportioned to a reduction in ice area ranged from 11% to 100%, while decreasing ice area could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production. The change to CO2 air‐sea flux in response to ice and temperature changes averaged an Arctic‐wide 5.5 Tg C yr−1 (3.5%) increase, into the ocean. This increased carbon sink may be short‐lived, as ice cover continues to decrease and the ocean warms. The change in carbon fixation from phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude larger than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering changes to the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of ice dynamics in controlling ocean warming and production and thus the need for well‐behaved ice and BGC models within Earth system models if we hope to accurately predict Arctic changes. Plain Language Summary Through their impacts on water temperature and sea ice cover, changes to the global climate system are likely to have large implications for Arctic marine ecosystems and consequently for Arctic marine production and the carbon cycle. Here we performed a series of experiments with a modern Earth system model to determine the relative importance of ice and temperature for annual net primary production and air‐sea CO2 flux across the Arctic Ocean. We compared model estimates from a validated baseline run to estimates from a model that had been driven with a warmer atmosphere and to projections from a model that had artificially reduced sea ice. Our experiments indicate that as the climate warms, the loss of ice cover will have a larger impact on ocean temperature and primary production than direct temperature changes. The change in carbon fixation by phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude greater than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Key Points Varying by region, reduced sea ice could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production under a warmer climate scenario Changes to carbon fixation by primary producers may be an order of magnitude greater than changes to air‐sea CO2 flux under future warming The HiLAT model replicates observed patterns of ice, surface temperature, and phytoplankton production in the Arctic but has a low nitrate bias</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JG005343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air ; Air temperature ; Algae ; Arctic ; Atmospheric models ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon fixation ; Carbon sinks ; Climate ; Climate system ; Computer simulation ; Dynamics ; Earth ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Environmental changes ; Environmental impact ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Experiments ; Fluctuations ; Flux ; Global climate ; Ice cover ; Ice volume ; Marine ecosystems ; Net Primary Productivity ; Ocean temperature ; Ocean warming ; Phytoplankton ; Primary production ; production ; Sea ice ; warming ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. The Authors.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2189-7139 ; 0000-0002-6688-7578 ; 0000-0002-5654-562X ; 0000-0002-7677-4745 ; 000000025654562X ; 0000000266887578 ; 0000000321897139 ; 0000000276774745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1660596$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weijer, Wilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shanlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>We use a modern Earth system model to approximate the relative importance of ice versus temperature on Arctic marine ecosystem dynamics. We show that while the model adequately simulates ice volume, water temperature, air‐sea CO2 flux, and annual primary production in the Arctic, itunderestimates upper water column nitrate across the region. This nitrate bias is likely responsible for the apparent underestimation of ice algae production. Despite this shortcoming, the model appears to be a useful tool for exploring the impacts of environmental change on phytoplankton production and carbon dynamics over the Arctic Ocean. Our experiments indicate that under a warmer climate scenario, the percentage of ocean warming that could be apportioned to a reduction in ice area ranged from 11% to 100%, while decreasing ice area could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production. The change to CO2 air‐sea flux in response to ice and temperature changes averaged an Arctic‐wide 5.5 Tg C yr−1 (3.5%) increase, into the ocean. This increased carbon sink may be short‐lived, as ice cover continues to decrease and the ocean warms. The change in carbon fixation from phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude larger than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering changes to the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of ice dynamics in controlling ocean warming and production and thus the need for well‐behaved ice and BGC models within Earth system models if we hope to accurately predict Arctic changes. Plain Language Summary Through their impacts on water temperature and sea ice cover, changes to the global climate system are likely to have large implications for Arctic marine ecosystems and consequently for Arctic marine production and the carbon cycle. Here we performed a series of experiments with a modern Earth system model to determine the relative importance of ice and temperature for annual net primary production and air‐sea CO2 flux across the Arctic Ocean. We compared model estimates from a validated baseline run to estimates from a model that had been driven with a warmer atmosphere and to projections from a model that had artificially reduced sea ice. Our experiments indicate that as the climate warms, the loss of ice cover will have a larger impact on ocean temperature and primary production than direct temperature changes. The change in carbon fixation by phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude greater than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Key Points Varying by region, reduced sea ice could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production under a warmer climate scenario Changes to carbon fixation by primary producers may be an order of magnitude greater than changes to air‐sea CO2 flux under future warming The HiLAT model replicates observed patterns of ice, surface temperature, and phytoplankton production in the Arctic but has a low nitrate bias</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Arctic</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon fixation</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate system</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Ice cover</subject><subject>Ice volume</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Ocean temperature</subject><subject>Ocean warming</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>production</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>warming</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKo7HyDo1mouc8uyFB1b6oVa1yHNnNgp7WRMMkrf3pQRceXZnMPHx8_hR-iCkhtKmLhlhIpZSUjKE36EBoxmYlSIjB7_3ik_Refeb0icIiJKB-hpAVsV6k_A012rdMDW4FdQeKoBq6bCS9i14FToHODJWjXv4LFt8NjpUGv8qFzdAH5xtuoisM0ZOjFq6-H8Zw_R2_3dcvIwmj-X08l4PlIJL8RopbUyVOcqT5mugFBqVkYQvdIZSZUCxoqcpoYzJhgjVcUMEanOK04zFQnwIbrsc60PtfS6DqDX2jYN6CBpFlNEFqWrXmqd_ejAB7mxnWviX5IlLE8ywtjBuu4t7az3DoxsXb1Tbi8pkYdm5d9mo857_avewv5fV87KRRm7zwX_BlZJd7A</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Gibson, Georgina</creator><creator>Weijer, Wilbert</creator><creator>Jeffery, Nicole</creator><creator>Wang, Shanlin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-7578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-562X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7677-4745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000025654562X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000266887578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000321897139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000276774745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production</title><author>Gibson, Georgina ; Weijer, Wilbert ; Jeffery, Nicole ; Wang, Shanlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Arctic</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon fixation</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate system</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Ice cover</topic><topic>Ice volume</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Ocean temperature</topic><topic>Ocean warming</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>production</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>warming</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Georgina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weijer, Wilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shanlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Georgina</au><au>Weijer, Wilbert</au><au>Jeffery, Nicole</au><au>Wang, Shanlin</au><aucorp>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>We use a modern Earth system model to approximate the relative importance of ice versus temperature on Arctic marine ecosystem dynamics. We show that while the model adequately simulates ice volume, water temperature, air‐sea CO2 flux, and annual primary production in the Arctic, itunderestimates upper water column nitrate across the region. This nitrate bias is likely responsible for the apparent underestimation of ice algae production. Despite this shortcoming, the model appears to be a useful tool for exploring the impacts of environmental change on phytoplankton production and carbon dynamics over the Arctic Ocean. Our experiments indicate that under a warmer climate scenario, the percentage of ocean warming that could be apportioned to a reduction in ice area ranged from 11% to 100%, while decreasing ice area could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production. The change to CO2 air‐sea flux in response to ice and temperature changes averaged an Arctic‐wide 5.5 Tg C yr−1 (3.5%) increase, into the ocean. This increased carbon sink may be short‐lived, as ice cover continues to decrease and the ocean warms. The change in carbon fixation from phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude larger than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering changes to the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of ice dynamics in controlling ocean warming and production and thus the need for well‐behaved ice and BGC models within Earth system models if we hope to accurately predict Arctic changes. Plain Language Summary Through their impacts on water temperature and sea ice cover, changes to the global climate system are likely to have large implications for Arctic marine ecosystems and consequently for Arctic marine production and the carbon cycle. Here we performed a series of experiments with a modern Earth system model to determine the relative importance of ice and temperature for annual net primary production and air‐sea CO2 flux across the Arctic Ocean. We compared model estimates from a validated baseline run to estimates from a model that had been driven with a warmer atmosphere and to projections from a model that had artificially reduced sea ice. Our experiments indicate that as the climate warms, the loss of ice cover will have a larger impact on ocean temperature and primary production than direct temperature changes. The change in carbon fixation by phytoplankton in response to increased temperatures and reduced ice was generally more than a magnitude greater than the changes to CO2 flux, highlighting the importance of fully considering the marine ecosystem when assessing Arctic carbon cycle dynamics. Key Points Varying by region, reduced sea ice could account for 22–100% of the increase in annual ocean primary production under a warmer climate scenario Changes to carbon fixation by primary producers may be an order of magnitude greater than changes to air‐sea CO2 flux under future warming The HiLAT model replicates observed patterns of ice, surface temperature, and phytoplankton production in the Arctic but has a low nitrate bias</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JG005343</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-7578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-562X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7677-4745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000025654562X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000266887578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000321897139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000276774745</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1660596
source Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Air
Air temperature
Algae
Arctic
Atmospheric models
Carbon
Carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide
Carbon fixation
Carbon sinks
Climate
Climate system
Computer simulation
Dynamics
Earth
Ecosystem assessment
Ecosystem dynamics
Environmental changes
Environmental impact
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Experiments
Fluctuations
Flux
Global climate
Ice cover
Ice volume
Marine ecosystems
Net Primary Productivity
Ocean temperature
Ocean warming
Phytoplankton
Primary production
production
Sea ice
warming
Water circulation
Water column
Water temperature
title Relative Impact of Sea Ice and Temperature Changes on Arctic Marine Production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20Impact%20of%20Sea%20Ice%20and%20Temperature%20Changes%20on%20Arctic%20Marine%20Production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Gibson,%20Georgina&rft.aucorp=Los%20Alamos%20National%20Lab.%20(LANL),%20Los%20Alamos,%20NM%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JG005343&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2427460226%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4389-bccaf1c7a752cde011fbf90cbc605aae228715f3229220dd2f095c7d316a922e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427460226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true