Loading…

Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production

•We measured shale fracture permeability on a TDS system with X-ray CT and fluid flow.•Hydraulic aperture is greatly smaller than mechanical aperture for in-situ fractures.•Compressibility and surface roughness both affect stress sensitivity of fracture permeability.•Fracture closure can greatly aff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuel (Guildford) 2021-04, Vol.290 (C), p.119984, Article 119984
Main Authors: Li, Wenfeng, Frash, Luke P., Welch, Nathan J., Carey, J. William, Meng, Meng, Wigand, Marcus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page 119984
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 290
creator Li, Wenfeng
Frash, Luke P.
Welch, Nathan J.
Carey, J. William
Meng, Meng
Wigand, Marcus
description •We measured shale fracture permeability on a TDS system with X-ray CT and fluid flow.•Hydraulic aperture is greatly smaller than mechanical aperture for in-situ fractures.•Compressibility and surface roughness both affect stress sensitivity of fracture permeability.•Fracture closure can greatly affect gas production and optimal bottomhole pressure in some cases. Stress-dependent fracture permeability could significantly affect oil and gas production, underground CO2 storage, and deep waste disposal containment. Yet, measurements to characterize these effects are lacking. To be most relevant to field conditions, measurements of stress-dependent fracture permeability should target pre-existing fracture features, be completed at high-stress conditions, and enable visualization of the fracture geometry to characterize the in-situ aperture profiles. Here, we employ triaxial direct-shear (TDS) tests, integrated with real-time X-ray imaging, to measure the stress-dependent fracture permeability of Marcellus shale and ‘Western Texas’ shale at subsurface conditions. Our results indicate that the studied shale fractures are characterized by large variation of compressibility factor. We also found that surface roughness can reduce fracture permeability more severely than what literature values would suggest. We then implemented our stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements in a formation-linear flow model to investigate the significance for shale gas production. The model uses the MIP-3H well at the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory (MSEEL) as a base case. The model results reveal a narrow stress-dependent permeability range over which fracture closure can be critical for production and that MSEEL appears to be close to this critical condition, which could be important for reservoir pressure management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119984
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1775787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001623612032980X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2576621809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoINNJXiAr0a49keQfSdBNCU0bCGTRZhmEfHWdkfHYriQX5u0j466zkrg6n_juIeSWswNnvLnrD92Cw0EwkQdca1VdkB1Xsiwkr8tPZMcyVYiy4Vfkc4w9Y0yqutqR198pYIyFwxlHh2OiXbCQloB0xnBC2_rBpzPNt5iHp0xEakdH_WkePNjkpzHSbgo0Hu2A9M1GOofJLbC-XJPLzg4Rb_6fe_Ly8OPP_a_i6fnn4_33pwJKrVPBJWDjlGorLsCithqcUE0LYEVdOV7xTtXAnJKyKxWCbDtUXFRSl9oitOWefNn-nWLyJoJPCEeYxhEhGS5lLbOKPfm6Qbnf3wVjMv20hDH3MqKWTSO4YjpTYqMgTDEG7Mwc_MmGs-HMrK5Nb1bXZnVtNtc59G0LYV7yn8ewdsAR0PmwVnCT_yj-DnUlibs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576621809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Wenfeng ; Frash, Luke P. ; Welch, Nathan J. ; Carey, J. William ; Meng, Meng ; Wigand, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenfeng ; Frash, Luke P. ; Welch, Nathan J. ; Carey, J. William ; Meng, Meng ; Wigand, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>•We measured shale fracture permeability on a TDS system with X-ray CT and fluid flow.•Hydraulic aperture is greatly smaller than mechanical aperture for in-situ fractures.•Compressibility and surface roughness both affect stress sensitivity of fracture permeability.•Fracture closure can greatly affect gas production and optimal bottomhole pressure in some cases. Stress-dependent fracture permeability could significantly affect oil and gas production, underground CO2 storage, and deep waste disposal containment. Yet, measurements to characterize these effects are lacking. To be most relevant to field conditions, measurements of stress-dependent fracture permeability should target pre-existing fracture features, be completed at high-stress conditions, and enable visualization of the fracture geometry to characterize the in-situ aperture profiles. Here, we employ triaxial direct-shear (TDS) tests, integrated with real-time X-ray imaging, to measure the stress-dependent fracture permeability of Marcellus shale and ‘Western Texas’ shale at subsurface conditions. Our results indicate that the studied shale fractures are characterized by large variation of compressibility factor. We also found that surface roughness can reduce fracture permeability more severely than what literature values would suggest. We then implemented our stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements in a formation-linear flow model to investigate the significance for shale gas production. The model uses the MIP-3H well at the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory (MSEEL) as a base case. The model results reveal a narrow stress-dependent permeability range over which fracture closure can be critical for production and that MSEEL appears to be close to this critical condition, which could be important for reservoir pressure management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Compressibility ; Containment ; Fracture permeability ; Fractures ; Gas production ; Hydraulic aperture ; Mechanical aperture ; Oil and gas production ; Permeability ; Reservoir management ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Shale gas production ; Shales ; Stress ; Surface roughness ; Triaxial direct-shear (TDS) ; Underground storage ; Waste disposal ; X ray imagery ; X-ray microtomography</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2021-04, Vol.290 (C), p.119984, Article 119984</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1775787$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frash, Luke P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, J. William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigand, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>•We measured shale fracture permeability on a TDS system with X-ray CT and fluid flow.•Hydraulic aperture is greatly smaller than mechanical aperture for in-situ fractures.•Compressibility and surface roughness both affect stress sensitivity of fracture permeability.•Fracture closure can greatly affect gas production and optimal bottomhole pressure in some cases. Stress-dependent fracture permeability could significantly affect oil and gas production, underground CO2 storage, and deep waste disposal containment. Yet, measurements to characterize these effects are lacking. To be most relevant to field conditions, measurements of stress-dependent fracture permeability should target pre-existing fracture features, be completed at high-stress conditions, and enable visualization of the fracture geometry to characterize the in-situ aperture profiles. Here, we employ triaxial direct-shear (TDS) tests, integrated with real-time X-ray imaging, to measure the stress-dependent fracture permeability of Marcellus shale and ‘Western Texas’ shale at subsurface conditions. Our results indicate that the studied shale fractures are characterized by large variation of compressibility factor. We also found that surface roughness can reduce fracture permeability more severely than what literature values would suggest. We then implemented our stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements in a formation-linear flow model to investigate the significance for shale gas production. The model uses the MIP-3H well at the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory (MSEEL) as a base case. The model results reveal a narrow stress-dependent permeability range over which fracture closure can be critical for production and that MSEEL appears to be close to this critical condition, which could be important for reservoir pressure management.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>Containment</subject><subject>Fracture permeability</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Hydraulic aperture</subject><subject>Mechanical aperture</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Reservoir management</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Shale gas production</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Triaxial direct-shear (TDS)</subject><subject>Underground storage</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>X ray imagery</subject><subject>X-ray microtomography</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoINNJXiAr0a49keQfSdBNCU0bCGTRZhmEfHWdkfHYriQX5u0j466zkrg6n_juIeSWswNnvLnrD92Cw0EwkQdca1VdkB1Xsiwkr8tPZMcyVYiy4Vfkc4w9Y0yqutqR198pYIyFwxlHh2OiXbCQloB0xnBC2_rBpzPNt5iHp0xEakdH_WkePNjkpzHSbgo0Hu2A9M1GOofJLbC-XJPLzg4Rb_6fe_Ly8OPP_a_i6fnn4_33pwJKrVPBJWDjlGorLsCithqcUE0LYEVdOV7xTtXAnJKyKxWCbDtUXFRSl9oitOWefNn-nWLyJoJPCEeYxhEhGS5lLbOKPfm6Qbnf3wVjMv20hDH3MqKWTSO4YjpTYqMgTDEG7Mwc_MmGs-HMrK5Nb1bXZnVtNtc59G0LYV7yn8ewdsAR0PmwVnCT_yj-DnUlibs</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Li, Wenfeng</creator><creator>Frash, Luke P.</creator><creator>Welch, Nathan J.</creator><creator>Carey, J. William</creator><creator>Meng, Meng</creator><creator>Wigand, Marcus</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production</title><author>Li, Wenfeng ; Frash, Luke P. ; Welch, Nathan J. ; Carey, J. William ; Meng, Meng ; Wigand, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>Containment</topic><topic>Fracture permeability</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Hydraulic aperture</topic><topic>Mechanical aperture</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Reservoir management</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Shale gas production</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Triaxial direct-shear (TDS)</topic><topic>Underground storage</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>X ray imagery</topic><topic>X-ray microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frash, Luke P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, J. William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigand, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Wenfeng</au><au>Frash, Luke P.</au><au>Welch, Nathan J.</au><au>Carey, J. William</au><au>Meng, Meng</au><au>Wigand, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>119984</spage><pages>119984-</pages><artnum>119984</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>•We measured shale fracture permeability on a TDS system with X-ray CT and fluid flow.•Hydraulic aperture is greatly smaller than mechanical aperture for in-situ fractures.•Compressibility and surface roughness both affect stress sensitivity of fracture permeability.•Fracture closure can greatly affect gas production and optimal bottomhole pressure in some cases. Stress-dependent fracture permeability could significantly affect oil and gas production, underground CO2 storage, and deep waste disposal containment. Yet, measurements to characterize these effects are lacking. To be most relevant to field conditions, measurements of stress-dependent fracture permeability should target pre-existing fracture features, be completed at high-stress conditions, and enable visualization of the fracture geometry to characterize the in-situ aperture profiles. Here, we employ triaxial direct-shear (TDS) tests, integrated with real-time X-ray imaging, to measure the stress-dependent fracture permeability of Marcellus shale and ‘Western Texas’ shale at subsurface conditions. Our results indicate that the studied shale fractures are characterized by large variation of compressibility factor. We also found that surface roughness can reduce fracture permeability more severely than what literature values would suggest. We then implemented our stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements in a formation-linear flow model to investigate the significance for shale gas production. The model uses the MIP-3H well at the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory (MSEEL) as a base case. The model results reveal a narrow stress-dependent permeability range over which fracture closure can be critical for production and that MSEEL appears to be close to this critical condition, which could be important for reservoir pressure management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119984</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2021-04, Vol.290 (C), p.119984, Article 119984
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1775787
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Compressibility
Containment
Fracture permeability
Fractures
Gas production
Hydraulic aperture
Mechanical aperture
Oil and gas production
Permeability
Reservoir management
Shale
Shale gas
Shale gas production
Shales
Stress
Surface roughness
Triaxial direct-shear (TDS)
Underground storage
Waste disposal
X ray imagery
X-ray microtomography
title Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress-dependent%20fracture%20permeability%20measurements%20and%20implications%20for%20shale%20gas%20production&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Li,%20Wenfeng&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=119984&rft.pages=119984-&rft.artnum=119984&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2576621809%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-17ce6d88b412cae9a9cd286bcca254d141f85c0d877f38ec7bfe81247939aecb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576621809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true