Convective Transition Statistics over Tropical Oceans for Climate Model Diagnostics: GCM Evaluation

• Published in: Journal of the atmospheric sciences 2020-01, Vol.77 (1), p.379-403
• Main Authors: Kuo, Yi-Hung, Neelin, J. David, Chen, Chih-Chieh, Chen, Wei-Ting, Donner, Leo J., Gettelman, Andrew, Jiang, Xianan, Kuo, Kuan-Ting, Maloney, Eric, Mechoso, Carlos R., Ming, Yi, Schiro, Kathleen A., Seman, Charles J., Wu, Chien-Ming, Zhao, Ming
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atmospheric models; Climate; Climate models; Computer simulation; Convection; Convective parameterization; Diagnostics; Drizzle; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Evaluation; High temperature; Humidity; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Microphysics; Model evaluation/performance; Moist convection; Ocean models; Oceans; Precipitation; Probability theory; Remote sensing systems; Representations; Simulation; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Statistics; Task forces; Temperature; Temperature rise; Temporal resolution; Tropical climate; Tropical climates; Water vapor; Water vapour
• ISSN: 0022-4928; 1520-0469
• DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0132.1

To assess deep convective parameterizations in a variety of GCMs and examine the fast-time-scale convective transition, a set of statistics characterizing the pickup of precipitation as a function of column water vapor (CWV), PDFs and joint PDFs of CWV and precipitation, and the dependence of the moisture–precipitation relation on tropospheric temperature is evaluated using the hourly output of two versions of the GFDL Atmospheric Model, version 4 (AM4), NCAR CAM5 and superparameterized CAM (SPCAM). The 6-hourly output from the MJO Task Force (MJOTF)/GEWEX Atmospheric System Study (GASS) project is also analyzed. Contrasting statistics produced from individual models that primarily differ in representations of moist convection suggest that convective transition statistics can substantially distinguish differences in convective representation and its interaction with the large-scale flow, while models that differ only in spatial–temporal resolution, microphysics, or ocean–atmosphere coupling result in similar statistics. Most of the models simulate some version of the observed sharp increase in precipitation as CWV exceeds a critical value, as well as that convective onset occurs at higher CWV but at lower column RH as temperature increases. While some models quantitatively capture these observed features and associated probability distributions, considerable intermodel spread and departures from observations in various aspects of the precipitation–CWV relationship are noted. For instance, in many of the models, the transition from the low-CWV, nonprecipitating regime to the moist regime for CWV around and above critical is less abrupt than in observations. Additionally, some models overproduce drizzle at low CWV, and some require CWV higher than observed for strong precipitation. For many of the models, it is particularly challenging to simulate the probability distributions of CWV at high temperature.