Loading…
Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries
We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been imple...
Saved in:
Published in: | ACS energy letters 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923 |
container_end_page | 3943 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3932 |
container_title | ACS energy letters |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Li, Min Odom, Susan A. Pancoast, Adam R. Robertson, Lily A. Vaid, Thomas P. Agarwal, Garvit Doan, Hieu A. Wang, Yilin Suduwella, T. Malsha Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. Ewoldt, Randy H. Assary, Rajeev S. Zhang, Lu Sigman, Matthew S. Minteer, Shelley D. |
description | We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1846591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1021_acsenergylett_1c01675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZ-ghC870zSpk0vdWwqDCd-XIdwclorNZlJhuu_t7JdKOfiPRcPL7wPIZeczTkT_NpARIehHXpMac6B8bKSJ2QicsUyxWt5-uc_J7MYPxgbISXHm5D1cr_F0H2iS6anT8EnD76PtPGBvqSdHTrX0k1ojeuAPnqXma8d-l2kz2j9nq56_01vTUpjB8YLctaYPuLsmFPytlq-Lu6z9ebuYXGzziAXVcoqK5sKpABluKjKWoAQrMg5U5bVBgppsRSlKq3NBTeFaQS3SjSGmQpqrEU-JVeHXh9TpyN0CeEdvHMISXNVlLLmIyQPEAQfY8BGb8edJgyaM_2rTv9Tp4_q8h9N3GaG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D. ; Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2380-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-8195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society (ACS)</publisher><subject>batteries ; electrochemical cells ; electrolytes ; ENERGY STORAGE ; organic reactions ; redox reactions</subject><ispartof>ACS energy letters, 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1169-9649 ; 0000-0003-1610-2995 ; 0000-0002-7814-6072 ; 0000-0002-8784-0568 ; 0000-0001-6708-5852 ; 0000-0002-5788-2249 ; 0000-0003-0367-0862 ; 0000-0003-2720-9712 ; 0000-0002-9571-3307 ; 0000-0003-4597-0847 ; 0000-0002-5746-8830 ; 0000000167085852 ; 0000000257468830 ; 0000000278146072 ; 0000000316102995 ; 0000000311699649 ; 0000000295713307 ; 0000000287840568 ; 0000000303670862 ; 0000000257882249 ; 0000000345970847 ; 0000000327209712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1846591$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancoast, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Lily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaid, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Garvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Hieu A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assary, Rajeev S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minteer, Shelley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><title>ACS energy letters</title><description>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</description><subject>batteries</subject><subject>electrochemical cells</subject><subject>electrolytes</subject><subject>ENERGY STORAGE</subject><subject>organic reactions</subject><subject>redox reactions</subject><issn>2380-8195</issn><issn>2380-8195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZ-ghC870zSpk0vdWwqDCd-XIdwclorNZlJhuu_t7JdKOfiPRcPL7wPIZeczTkT_NpARIehHXpMac6B8bKSJ2QicsUyxWt5-uc_J7MYPxgbISXHm5D1cr_F0H2iS6anT8EnD76PtPGBvqSdHTrX0k1ojeuAPnqXma8d-l2kz2j9nq56_01vTUpjB8YLctaYPuLsmFPytlq-Lu6z9ebuYXGzziAXVcoqK5sKpABluKjKWoAQrMg5U5bVBgppsRSlKq3NBTeFaQS3SjSGmQpqrEU-JVeHXh9TpyN0CeEdvHMISXNVlLLmIyQPEAQfY8BGb8edJgyaM_2rTv9Tp4_q8h9N3GaG</recordid><startdate>20211112</startdate><enddate>20211112</enddate><creator>Li, Min</creator><creator>Odom, Susan A.</creator><creator>Pancoast, Adam R.</creator><creator>Robertson, Lily A.</creator><creator>Vaid, Thomas P.</creator><creator>Agarwal, Garvit</creator><creator>Doan, Hieu A.</creator><creator>Wang, Yilin</creator><creator>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creator><creator>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creator><creator>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creator><creator>Assary, Rajeev S.</creator><creator>Zhang, Lu</creator><creator>Sigman, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Minteer, Shelley D.</creator><general>American Chemical Society (ACS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-9649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-0862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-3307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-0847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-8830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167085852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257468830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000278146072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000316102995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000311699649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295713307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000287840568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000303670862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257882249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000345970847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327209712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211112</creationdate><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><author>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>batteries</topic><topic>electrochemical cells</topic><topic>electrolytes</topic><topic>ENERGY STORAGE</topic><topic>organic reactions</topic><topic>redox reactions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancoast, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Lily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaid, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Garvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Hieu A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assary, Rajeev S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minteer, Shelley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>ACS energy letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Min</au><au>Odom, Susan A.</au><au>Pancoast, Adam R.</au><au>Robertson, Lily A.</au><au>Vaid, Thomas P.</au><au>Agarwal, Garvit</au><au>Doan, Hieu A.</au><au>Wang, Yilin</au><au>Suduwella, T. Malsha</au><au>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</au><au>Ewoldt, Randy H.</au><au>Assary, Rajeev S.</au><au>Zhang, Lu</au><au>Sigman, Matthew S.</au><au>Minteer, Shelley D.</au><aucorp>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</atitle><jtitle>ACS energy letters</jtitle><date>2021-11-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3932</spage><epage>3943</epage><pages>3932-3943</pages><issn>2380-8195</issn><eissn>2380-8195</eissn><abstract>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society (ACS)</pub><doi>10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-9649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-0862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-3307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-0847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-8830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167085852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257468830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000278146072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000316102995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000311699649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295713307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000287840568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000303670862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257882249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000345970847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327209712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2380-8195 |
ispartof | ACS energy letters, 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943 |
issn | 2380-8195 2380-8195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1846591 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | batteries electrochemical cells electrolytes ENERGY STORAGE organic reactions redox reactions |
title | Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Protocols%20for%20Studying%20Organic%20Non-aqueous%20Redox%20Flow%20Batteries&rft.jtitle=ACS%20energy%20letters&rft.au=Li,%20Min&rft.aucorp=Argonne%20National%20Lab.%20(ANL),%20Argonne,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2021-11-12&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3932&rft.epage=3943&rft.pages=3932-3943&rft.issn=2380-8195&rft.eissn=2380-8195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1021_acsenergylett_1c01675%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |