Loading…

Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries

We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been imple...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ACS energy letters 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943
Main Authors: Li, Min, Odom, Susan A., Pancoast, Adam R., Robertson, Lily A., Vaid, Thomas P., Agarwal, Garvit, Doan, Hieu A., Wang, Yilin, Suduwella, T. Malsha, Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R., Ewoldt, Randy H., Assary, Rajeev S., Zhang, Lu, Sigman, Matthew S., Minteer, Shelley D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923
container_end_page 3943
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3932
container_title ACS energy letters
container_volume 6
creator Li, Min
Odom, Susan A.
Pancoast, Adam R.
Robertson, Lily A.
Vaid, Thomas P.
Agarwal, Garvit
Doan, Hieu A.
Wang, Yilin
Suduwella, T. Malsha
Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.
Ewoldt, Randy H.
Assary, Rajeev S.
Zhang, Lu
Sigman, Matthew S.
Minteer, Shelley D.
description We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1846591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1021_acsenergylett_1c01675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZ-ghC870zSpk0vdWwqDCd-XIdwclorNZlJhuu_t7JdKOfiPRcPL7wPIZeczTkT_NpARIehHXpMac6B8bKSJ2QicsUyxWt5-uc_J7MYPxgbISXHm5D1cr_F0H2iS6anT8EnD76PtPGBvqSdHTrX0k1ojeuAPnqXma8d-l2kz2j9nq56_01vTUpjB8YLctaYPuLsmFPytlq-Lu6z9ebuYXGzziAXVcoqK5sKpABluKjKWoAQrMg5U5bVBgppsRSlKq3NBTeFaQS3SjSGmQpqrEU-JVeHXh9TpyN0CeEdvHMISXNVlLLmIyQPEAQfY8BGb8edJgyaM_2rTv9Tp4_q8h9N3GaG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D. ; Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2380-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-8195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society (ACS)</publisher><subject>batteries ; electrochemical cells ; electrolytes ; ENERGY STORAGE ; organic reactions ; redox reactions</subject><ispartof>ACS energy letters, 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1169-9649 ; 0000-0003-1610-2995 ; 0000-0002-7814-6072 ; 0000-0002-8784-0568 ; 0000-0001-6708-5852 ; 0000-0002-5788-2249 ; 0000-0003-0367-0862 ; 0000-0003-2720-9712 ; 0000-0002-9571-3307 ; 0000-0003-4597-0847 ; 0000-0002-5746-8830 ; 0000000167085852 ; 0000000257468830 ; 0000000278146072 ; 0000000316102995 ; 0000000311699649 ; 0000000295713307 ; 0000000287840568 ; 0000000303670862 ; 0000000257882249 ; 0000000345970847 ; 0000000327209712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1846591$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancoast, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Lily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaid, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Garvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Hieu A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assary, Rajeev S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minteer, Shelley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><title>ACS energy letters</title><description>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</description><subject>batteries</subject><subject>electrochemical cells</subject><subject>electrolytes</subject><subject>ENERGY STORAGE</subject><subject>organic reactions</subject><subject>redox reactions</subject><issn>2380-8195</issn><issn>2380-8195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZ-ghC870zSpk0vdWwqDCd-XIdwclorNZlJhuu_t7JdKOfiPRcPL7wPIZeczTkT_NpARIehHXpMac6B8bKSJ2QicsUyxWt5-uc_J7MYPxgbISXHm5D1cr_F0H2iS6anT8EnD76PtPGBvqSdHTrX0k1ojeuAPnqXma8d-l2kz2j9nq56_01vTUpjB8YLctaYPuLsmFPytlq-Lu6z9ebuYXGzziAXVcoqK5sKpABluKjKWoAQrMg5U5bVBgppsRSlKq3NBTeFaQS3SjSGmQpqrEU-JVeHXh9TpyN0CeEdvHMISXNVlLLmIyQPEAQfY8BGb8edJgyaM_2rTv9Tp4_q8h9N3GaG</recordid><startdate>20211112</startdate><enddate>20211112</enddate><creator>Li, Min</creator><creator>Odom, Susan A.</creator><creator>Pancoast, Adam R.</creator><creator>Robertson, Lily A.</creator><creator>Vaid, Thomas P.</creator><creator>Agarwal, Garvit</creator><creator>Doan, Hieu A.</creator><creator>Wang, Yilin</creator><creator>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creator><creator>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creator><creator>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creator><creator>Assary, Rajeev S.</creator><creator>Zhang, Lu</creator><creator>Sigman, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Minteer, Shelley D.</creator><general>American Chemical Society (ACS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-9649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-0862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-3307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-0847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-8830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167085852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257468830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000278146072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000316102995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000311699649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295713307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000287840568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000303670862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257882249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000345970847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327209712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211112</creationdate><title>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</title><author>Li, Min ; Odom, Susan A. ; Pancoast, Adam R. ; Robertson, Lily A. ; Vaid, Thomas P. ; Agarwal, Garvit ; Doan, Hieu A. ; Wang, Yilin ; Suduwella, T. Malsha ; Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R. ; Ewoldt, Randy H. ; Assary, Rajeev S. ; Zhang, Lu ; Sigman, Matthew S. ; Minteer, Shelley D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>batteries</topic><topic>electrochemical cells</topic><topic>electrolytes</topic><topic>ENERGY STORAGE</topic><topic>organic reactions</topic><topic>redox reactions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odom, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancoast, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Lily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaid, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Garvit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Hieu A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suduwella, T. Malsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewoldt, Randy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assary, Rajeev S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minteer, Shelley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>ACS energy letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Min</au><au>Odom, Susan A.</au><au>Pancoast, Adam R.</au><au>Robertson, Lily A.</au><au>Vaid, Thomas P.</au><au>Agarwal, Garvit</au><au>Doan, Hieu A.</au><au>Wang, Yilin</au><au>Suduwella, T. Malsha</au><au>Bheemireddy, Sambasiva R.</au><au>Ewoldt, Randy H.</au><au>Assary, Rajeev S.</au><au>Zhang, Lu</au><au>Sigman, Matthew S.</au><au>Minteer, Shelley D.</au><aucorp>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries</atitle><jtitle>ACS energy letters</jtitle><date>2021-11-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3932</spage><epage>3943</epage><pages>3932-3943</pages><issn>2380-8195</issn><eissn>2380-8195</eissn><abstract>We report that Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are promising devices for grid-scale energy storage due to the decoupling of power and energy, which can be independently scaled by the electrode area and storage tank size, respectively. To date, only aqueous RFBs, such as the vanadium RFB, have been implemented commercially. Nevertheless, the limited energy densities and high-cost materials may preclude their wider market penetration. Organic non-aqueous redox-flow batteries (O-NRFBs), which utilize redox-active organic molecules (ROMs), have been offered as an attractive alternative. Many possible advantages include the use of earth-abundant elements (C, H, N, O, S, F), wherein the ROMs can be prepared from low-cost and sustainable materials. Additionally, a large variety of electroactive moieties are accessible as building blocks, providing a synthetic platform to tune the properties of ROMs through rational design. As a consequence, the development of novel ROMs has attracted researchers with diverse backgrounds, prompting remarkable innovations in the past decade. However, consistency in experimental protocols (e.g., electrochemical methods, cycling stability, experimental conditions) has not coincided with this uptick in research, leading to sometimes ambiguous and incomparable results. This is further convoluted by the complexity innate to battery development, such as cell design, detection, and characterization of reactions and active components. The O-NRFB application imposes stringent requirements on the physical or/and chemical processes involved in electrochemical cycling. Yet such considerations are often overlooked. Further, while quantum mechanical calculations provide a convenient tool for evaluating and selecting ROM candidates, this simulation is not always performed. Thus, in this Energy Focus, we detail a means to standardize experimental protocols for studies of O-NRFBs and suggest practices to facilitate fundamental understanding and development of ROMs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society (ACS)</pub><doi>10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-9649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-2995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7814-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-0862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9712</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-3307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-0847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5746-8830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167085852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257468830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000278146072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000316102995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000311699649</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295713307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000287840568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000303670862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000257882249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000345970847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327209712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2380-8195
ispartof ACS energy letters, 2021-11, Vol.6 (11), p.3932-3943
issn 2380-8195
2380-8195
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1846591
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects batteries
electrochemical cells
electrolytes
ENERGY STORAGE
organic reactions
redox reactions
title Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Protocols%20for%20Studying%20Organic%20Non-aqueous%20Redox%20Flow%20Batteries&rft.jtitle=ACS%20energy%20letters&rft.au=Li,%20Min&rft.aucorp=Argonne%20National%20Lab.%20(ANL),%20Argonne,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2021-11-12&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3932&rft.epage=3943&rft.pages=3932-3943&rft.issn=2380-8195&rft.eissn=2380-8195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1021_acsenergylett_1c01675%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-7d5f7c52c8a127692c22043108d09ac45de62686dd321a4af21d82fa0a7c9e923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true