Loading…

New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies

Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We fin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a
Main Authors: Wong, A. Y. H., Geddes, J. A., Ducker, J. A., Holmes, C. D., Fares, S., Goldstein, A. H., Mammarella, I., Munger, J. W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 49
creator Wong, A. Y. H.
Geddes, J. A.
Ducker, J. A.
Holmes, C. D.
Fares, S.
Goldstein, A. H.
Mammarella, I.
Munger, J. W.
description Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition. Plain Language Summary Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses. Key Points Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021GL095717
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1982072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2655578815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EEiFw4wEsuBIY_9n1-lg1Ia0UtVULZ8vrnSWuEjvYTkM48Qh9Rp4EV-HAidOMfvr0aeZHyFsGHxlw_YkDZ8sV6EYx9YxMmJZy1gGo52QCoOvOVfuSvMr5HgAECDYh5QoPdPHgBwwO6RgTLWukl9tdTMU-RXGkVzH8_vV4V-LWFruhN7asD_aYqQ_0-mcMSOe4i9kXHwOd75MP3-jiR0m4RXqBtlAbBjpPR3oWqmHjMb8mL0a7yfjm75ySr58XX84vZqvr5eX52WrmhGLdrLeDFoMQXdMIJ3nfaq5HK0X90jWyBuPQuZ71OEipRukQHKtkz8ZWgdatmJJ3J2_MxZvsfEG3djEEdMUw3XFQvELvT9Auxe97zMXcx30K9S7D26ZpVNdV65R8OFEuxZwTjmaX_Namo2Fgnso3_5ZfcX7CD36Dx_-yZnm7aiVAJ_4AMVOFhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655578815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W. ; US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><description>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition. Plain Language Summary Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses. Key Points Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021GL095717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; air quality ; Anomalies ; atmosphere-biosphere flux ; Atmospheric models ; Carbon dioxide ; Conductance ; Deposition ; Dry air ; Dry deposition ; Emission measurements ; Environmental conditions ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; extreme condition ; Extreme heat ; Extreme high temperatures ; Herbivores ; Ozone ; Ozone deposition ; Photosynthesis ; Photosynthetic activity ; Plant cover ; Pollutants ; Reduction ; Soil ; Soils ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Uptake ; Velocity ; Water vapor ; Water vapour</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1042-8452 ; 0000-0002-8516-3356 ; 0000-0003-4014-4896 ; 0000-0001-6386-3063 ; 0000-0002-1990-0928 ; 0000-0002-2727-0954 ; 0000-0001-7573-6133 ; 0000000219900928 ; 0000000285163356 ; 0000000340144896 ; 0000000163863063 ; 0000000175736133 ; 0000000227270954 ; 0000000210428452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021GL095717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021GL095717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1982072$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geddes, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducker, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammarella, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition. Plain Language Summary Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses. Key Points Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>atmosphere-biosphere flux</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dry air</subject><subject>Dry deposition</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>extreme condition</subject><subject>Extreme heat</subject><subject>Extreme high temperatures</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone deposition</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosynthetic activity</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><subject>Water vapour</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EEiFw4wEsuBIY_9n1-lg1Ia0UtVULZ8vrnSWuEjvYTkM48Qh9Rp4EV-HAidOMfvr0aeZHyFsGHxlw_YkDZ8sV6EYx9YxMmJZy1gGo52QCoOvOVfuSvMr5HgAECDYh5QoPdPHgBwwO6RgTLWukl9tdTMU-RXGkVzH8_vV4V-LWFruhN7asD_aYqQ_0-mcMSOe4i9kXHwOd75MP3-jiR0m4RXqBtlAbBjpPR3oWqmHjMb8mL0a7yfjm75ySr58XX84vZqvr5eX52WrmhGLdrLeDFoMQXdMIJ3nfaq5HK0X90jWyBuPQuZ71OEipRukQHKtkz8ZWgdatmJJ3J2_MxZvsfEG3djEEdMUw3XFQvELvT9Auxe97zMXcx30K9S7D26ZpVNdV65R8OFEuxZwTjmaX_Namo2Fgnso3_5ZfcX7CD36Dx_-yZnm7aiVAJ_4AMVOFhw</recordid><startdate>20220428</startdate><enddate>20220428</enddate><creator>Wong, A. Y. H.</creator><creator>Geddes, J. A.</creator><creator>Ducker, J. A.</creator><creator>Holmes, C. D.</creator><creator>Fares, S.</creator><creator>Goldstein, A. H.</creator><creator>Mammarella, I.</creator><creator>Munger, J. W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-3063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000219900928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000285163356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000340144896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000163863063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000175736133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227270954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000210428452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220428</creationdate><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><author>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>atmosphere-biosphere flux</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dry air</topic><topic>Dry deposition</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>extreme condition</topic><topic>Extreme heat</topic><topic>Extreme high temperatures</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone deposition</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosynthetic activity</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><topic>Water vapour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geddes, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducker, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammarella, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, A. Y. H.</au><au>Geddes, J. A.</au><au>Ducker, J. A.</au><au>Holmes, C. D.</au><au>Fares, S.</au><au>Goldstein, A. H.</au><au>Mammarella, I.</au><au>Munger, J. W.</au><aucorp>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2022-04-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition. Plain Language Summary Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses. Key Points Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021GL095717</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-3063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000219900928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000285163356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000340144896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000163863063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000175736133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227270954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000210428452</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1982072
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Air pollution
air quality
Anomalies
atmosphere-biosphere flux
Atmospheric models
Carbon dioxide
Conductance
Deposition
Dry air
Dry deposition
Emission measurements
Environmental conditions
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
extreme condition
Extreme heat
Extreme high temperatures
Herbivores
Ozone
Ozone deposition
Photosynthesis
Photosynthetic activity
Plant cover
Pollutants
Reduction
Soil
Soils
Stomata
Stomatal conductance
Uptake
Velocity
Water vapor
Water vapour
title New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Evidence%20for%20the%20Importance%20of%20Non%E2%80%90Stomatal%20Pathways%20in%20Ozone%20Deposition%20During%20Extreme%20Heat%20and%20Dry%20Anomalies&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Wong,%20A.%20Y.%20H.&rft.aucorp=US%20Department%20of%20Energy%20(USDOE),%20Washington,%20DC%20(United%20States).%20Office%20of%20Science,%20Biological%20and%20Environmental%20Research%20(BER)&rft.date=2022-04-28&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021GL095717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2655578815%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655578815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true