Loading…
New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies
Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We fin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Wong, A. Y. H. Geddes, J. A. Ducker, J. A. Holmes, C. D. Fares, S. Goldstein, A. H. Mammarella, I. Munger, J. W. |
description | Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition.
Plain Language Summary
Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses.
Key Points
Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site
Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered
Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021GL095717 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1982072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2655578815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EEiFw4wEsuBIY_9n1-lg1Ia0UtVULZ8vrnSWuEjvYTkM48Qh9Rp4EV-HAidOMfvr0aeZHyFsGHxlw_YkDZ8sV6EYx9YxMmJZy1gGo52QCoOvOVfuSvMr5HgAECDYh5QoPdPHgBwwO6RgTLWukl9tdTMU-RXGkVzH8_vV4V-LWFruhN7asD_aYqQ_0-mcMSOe4i9kXHwOd75MP3-jiR0m4RXqBtlAbBjpPR3oWqmHjMb8mL0a7yfjm75ySr58XX84vZqvr5eX52WrmhGLdrLeDFoMQXdMIJ3nfaq5HK0X90jWyBuPQuZ71OEipRukQHKtkz8ZWgdatmJJ3J2_MxZvsfEG3djEEdMUw3XFQvELvT9Auxe97zMXcx30K9S7D26ZpVNdV65R8OFEuxZwTjmaX_Namo2Fgnso3_5ZfcX7CD36Dx_-yZnm7aiVAJ_4AMVOFhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655578815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W. ; US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><description>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition.
Plain Language Summary
Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses.
Key Points
Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site
Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered
Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021GL095717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; air quality ; Anomalies ; atmosphere-biosphere flux ; Atmospheric models ; Carbon dioxide ; Conductance ; Deposition ; Dry air ; Dry deposition ; Emission measurements ; Environmental conditions ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; extreme condition ; Extreme heat ; Extreme high temperatures ; Herbivores ; Ozone ; Ozone deposition ; Photosynthesis ; Photosynthetic activity ; Plant cover ; Pollutants ; Reduction ; Soil ; Soils ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Uptake ; Velocity ; Water vapor ; Water vapour</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1042-8452 ; 0000-0002-8516-3356 ; 0000-0003-4014-4896 ; 0000-0001-6386-3063 ; 0000-0002-1990-0928 ; 0000-0002-2727-0954 ; 0000-0001-7573-6133 ; 0000000219900928 ; 0000000285163356 ; 0000000340144896 ; 0000000163863063 ; 0000000175736133 ; 0000000227270954 ; 0000000210428452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021GL095717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021GL095717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1982072$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geddes, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducker, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammarella, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition.
Plain Language Summary
Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses.
Key Points
Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site
Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered
Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>atmosphere-biosphere flux</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dry air</subject><subject>Dry deposition</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>extreme condition</subject><subject>Extreme heat</subject><subject>Extreme high temperatures</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone deposition</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosynthetic activity</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><subject>Water vapour</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EEiFw4wEsuBIY_9n1-lg1Ia0UtVULZ8vrnSWuEjvYTkM48Qh9Rp4EV-HAidOMfvr0aeZHyFsGHxlw_YkDZ8sV6EYx9YxMmJZy1gGo52QCoOvOVfuSvMr5HgAECDYh5QoPdPHgBwwO6RgTLWukl9tdTMU-RXGkVzH8_vV4V-LWFruhN7asD_aYqQ_0-mcMSOe4i9kXHwOd75MP3-jiR0m4RXqBtlAbBjpPR3oWqmHjMb8mL0a7yfjm75ySr58XX84vZqvr5eX52WrmhGLdrLeDFoMQXdMIJ3nfaq5HK0X90jWyBuPQuZ71OEipRukQHKtkz8ZWgdatmJJ3J2_MxZvsfEG3djEEdMUw3XFQvELvT9Auxe97zMXcx30K9S7D26ZpVNdV65R8OFEuxZwTjmaX_Namo2Fgnso3_5ZfcX7CD36Dx_-yZnm7aiVAJ_4AMVOFhw</recordid><startdate>20220428</startdate><enddate>20220428</enddate><creator>Wong, A. Y. H.</creator><creator>Geddes, J. A.</creator><creator>Ducker, J. A.</creator><creator>Holmes, C. D.</creator><creator>Fares, S.</creator><creator>Goldstein, A. H.</creator><creator>Mammarella, I.</creator><creator>Munger, J. W.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-3063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000219900928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000285163356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000340144896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000163863063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000175736133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227270954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000210428452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220428</creationdate><title>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</title><author>Wong, A. Y. H. ; Geddes, J. A. ; Ducker, J. A. ; Holmes, C. D. ; Fares, S. ; Goldstein, A. H. ; Mammarella, I. ; Munger, J. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>atmosphere-biosphere flux</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dry air</topic><topic>Dry deposition</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>extreme condition</topic><topic>Extreme heat</topic><topic>Extreme high temperatures</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone deposition</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosynthetic activity</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><topic>Water vapour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, A. Y. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geddes, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducker, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, C. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fares, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammarella, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munger, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, A. Y. H.</au><au>Geddes, J. A.</au><au>Ducker, J. A.</au><au>Holmes, C. D.</au><au>Fares, S.</au><au>Goldstein, A. H.</au><au>Mammarella, I.</au><au>Munger, J. W.</au><aucorp>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2022-04-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition.
Plain Language Summary
Ozone is an important air pollutant that can threaten both human and plant health. Removal of ozone from the atmosphere may be reduced during extremely hot or dry events due to how plants respond to such environmental conditions (governed by stomatal or non‐stomatal processes separately). Using long‐term observations at three different sites, we find that non‐stomatal uptake generally increases on hot days, which can offset a reduction in stomatal uptake that is expected under the same conditions. The response to soil dryness is more complicated, but potentially related to responses in photosynthetic activity. Current models of on how ozone deposition affects surface ozone concentrations during hot and dry episodes are inaccurate because of their inability to represent non‐stomatal responses.
Key Points
Responses of total ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies vary considerably from site to site
Non‐stomatal deposition increases significantly during hot days in all three sites considered
Current big‐leaf parameterizations largely fail to capture the response mainly because of non‐stomatal deposition</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021GL095717</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-3063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000219900928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000285163356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000340144896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000163863063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000175736133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227270954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000210428452</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2022-04, Vol.49 (8), p.n/a |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1982072 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive |
subjects | Air pollution air quality Anomalies atmosphere-biosphere flux Atmospheric models Carbon dioxide Conductance Deposition Dry air Dry deposition Emission measurements Environmental conditions ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES extreme condition Extreme heat Extreme high temperatures Herbivores Ozone Ozone deposition Photosynthesis Photosynthetic activity Plant cover Pollutants Reduction Soil Soils Stomata Stomatal conductance Uptake Velocity Water vapor Water vapour |
title | New Evidence for the Importance of Non‐Stomatal Pathways in Ozone Deposition During Extreme Heat and Dry Anomalies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Evidence%20for%20the%20Importance%20of%20Non%E2%80%90Stomatal%20Pathways%20in%20Ozone%20Deposition%20During%20Extreme%20Heat%20and%20Dry%20Anomalies&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Wong,%20A.%20Y.%20H.&rft.aucorp=US%20Department%20of%20Energy%20(USDOE),%20Washington,%20DC%20(United%20States).%20Office%20of%20Science,%20Biological%20and%20Environmental%20Research%20(BER)&rft.date=2022-04-28&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021GL095717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2655578815%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3718-bad93d338553c42b6929fa43021c5442bfd8cb1bed447f4ce0c153cb1f6709963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655578815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |