Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality

Following more than a decade of negotiations, the Canada‐United States Agreement on Air Quality entered into force on March 13, 1991, with the signatures of then‐Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and US. President George Bush. Why was it so difficult for Canadian and US. negotiators to reach ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy studies journal 1999-01, Vol.27 (2), p.347-359
Main Author: Allison, Juliann Emmons
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acid rain
Agreement
Agreements
Air Pollution
AIR QUALITY
ATTITUDES
Canada
Coal-fired power plants
Comparative studies
Conflicts of interest
Emissions
ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY
Environmental impact
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Industrial plant emissions
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Metallurgy
Negotiations
Outdoor air quality
POLITICAL ASPECTS
Politics
Pollutants
Presidents
Prime ministers
PUBLIC OPINION
Regulation
Sulfur
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3
container_end_page 359
container_issue 2
container_start_page 347
container_title Policy studies journal
container_volume 27
creator Allison, Juliann Emmons
description Following more than a decade of negotiations, the Canada‐United States Agreement on Air Quality entered into force on March 13, 1991, with the signatures of then‐Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and US. President George Bush. Why was it so difficult for Canadian and US. negotiators to reach agreement? I argue that Canadian and U.S. domestic politics were the primary impediments to resolving the U.S.‐Canada acid rain dispute. This article thus casts the dispute in terms of a pair of domestic environmental policy problems, whose timely and complementary solution, furthermore, required executive initiative as the handmaiden of ecological crisis. Heightened public concern about the threat of acidic air pollution in Canada prompted Mulroney's efforts to reduce acid rain. In the United States, a likewise critical change in the public's perception of air quality as a national emergency created the mass support necessary for Bush's federal acid rain control initiative
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20006042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>44561404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUcFuEzEUXCGQCIV_sIrEbYPttdfrHpCilLagAkFNgZvleN-2GxK72F6R_D0v2qpIcED48my_mfEbT1EcMzpluF6vp0wKVlKq-JRprad5RZnGw-5RMXloPS4meEtLrvm3p8WzlNaUUi4UnRQ3ZyHmoc9hSGQefIIfA3gHJ2R5C-Q0bCHl3pFF2PRYEwkdydjApxiZW29bW177PkNLrrLNkMjsJgJswWcSPJn1kXweLHL3z4snnd0keHFfj4rrs7fL-UV5-en83Xx2WTqhtSq5cLXSraxV04lW1G3Hq0p3K041byVvRNtis2ZV3TkA3DLHmQCqYbUC3tnqqHg56gYc3CSHs7lbF7wHlw1H2zUVHFGvRtRdDGg4ZbPtk4PNxnrAnzA1bVgl1L-BTEguURSBx38A12GIHq0azqiUSgj2e7i_QayilFVSNxJRJyPKxZBShM7cxX5r494wag6pm7U5RGsO0ZpD6uY-dbND8puR_LPfwP4_mGZx9R4to0A5CvQpw-5BwMbvplaVkubrx3PzgX-5WDZqYRbVL5xAwNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300135985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creator><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creatorcontrib><description>Following more than a decade of negotiations, the Canada‐United States Agreement on Air Quality entered into force on March 13, 1991, with the signatures of then‐Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and US. President George Bush. Why was it so difficult for Canadian and US. negotiators to reach agreement? I argue that Canadian and U.S. domestic politics were the primary impediments to resolving the U.S.‐Canada acid rain dispute. This article thus casts the dispute in terms of a pair of domestic environmental policy problems, whose timely and complementary solution, furthermore, required executive initiative as the handmaiden of ecological crisis. Heightened public concern about the threat of acidic air pollution in Canada prompted Mulroney's efforts to reduce acid rain. In the United States, a likewise critical change in the public's perception of air quality as a national emergency created the mass support necessary for Bush's federal acid rain control initiative</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-292X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSJOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acid rain ; Agreement ; Agreements ; Air Pollution ; AIR QUALITY ; ATTITUDES ; Canada ; Coal-fired power plants ; Comparative studies ; Conflicts of interest ; Emissions ; ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY ; Environmental impact ; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ; Industrial plant emissions ; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ; Metallurgy ; Negotiations ; Outdoor air quality ; POLITICAL ASPECTS ; Politics ; Pollutants ; Presidents ; Prime ministers ; PUBLIC OPINION ; Regulation ; Sulfur ; United States</subject><ispartof>Policy studies journal, 1999-01, Vol.27 (2), p.347-359</ispartof><rights>Copyright Policy Studies Organization 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300135985/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300135985?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,11670,12827,12829,13387,21358,21369,21376,27848,27906,27907,33205,33593,33594,33751,33752,33967,33968,36042,36043,38596,38597,43715,43796,43930,44345,44736,73971,74060,74218,74645,75048</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20006042$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creatorcontrib><title>Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality</title><title>Policy studies journal</title><description>Following more than a decade of negotiations, the Canada‐United States Agreement on Air Quality entered into force on March 13, 1991, with the signatures of then‐Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and US. President George Bush. Why was it so difficult for Canadian and US. negotiators to reach agreement? I argue that Canadian and U.S. domestic politics were the primary impediments to resolving the U.S.‐Canada acid rain dispute. This article thus casts the dispute in terms of a pair of domestic environmental policy problems, whose timely and complementary solution, furthermore, required executive initiative as the handmaiden of ecological crisis. Heightened public concern about the threat of acidic air pollution in Canada prompted Mulroney's efforts to reduce acid rain. In the United States, a likewise critical change in the public's perception of air quality as a national emergency created the mass support necessary for Bush's federal acid rain control initiative</description><subject>Acid rain</subject><subject>Agreement</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Air Pollution</subject><subject>AIR QUALITY</subject><subject>ATTITUDES</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS</subject><subject>Metallurgy</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>POLITICAL ASPECTS</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><subject>PUBLIC OPINION</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0190-292X</issn><issn>1541-0072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUcFuEzEUXCGQCIV_sIrEbYPttdfrHpCilLagAkFNgZvleN-2GxK72F6R_D0v2qpIcED48my_mfEbT1EcMzpluF6vp0wKVlKq-JRprad5RZnGw-5RMXloPS4meEtLrvm3p8WzlNaUUi4UnRQ3ZyHmoc9hSGQefIIfA3gHJ2R5C-Q0bCHl3pFF2PRYEwkdydjApxiZW29bW177PkNLrrLNkMjsJgJswWcSPJn1kXweLHL3z4snnd0keHFfj4rrs7fL-UV5-en83Xx2WTqhtSq5cLXSraxV04lW1G3Hq0p3K041byVvRNtis2ZV3TkA3DLHmQCqYbUC3tnqqHg56gYc3CSHs7lbF7wHlw1H2zUVHFGvRtRdDGg4ZbPtk4PNxnrAnzA1bVgl1L-BTEguURSBx38A12GIHq0azqiUSgj2e7i_QayilFVSNxJRJyPKxZBShM7cxX5r494wag6pm7U5RGsO0ZpD6uY-dbND8puR_LPfwP4_mGZx9R4to0A5CvQpw-5BwMbvplaVkubrx3PzgX-5WDZqYRbVL5xAwNw</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>University of Illinois</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality</title><author>Allison, Juliann Emmons</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acid rain</topic><topic>Agreement</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Air Pollution</topic><topic>AIR QUALITY</topic><topic>ATTITUDES</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS</topic><topic>Metallurgy</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>POLITICAL ASPECTS</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><topic>PUBLIC OPINION</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Policy studies journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allison, Juliann Emmons</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality</atitle><jtitle>Policy studies journal</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>347-359</pages><issn>0190-292X</issn><eissn>1541-0072</eissn><coden>PSJOD9</coden><abstract>Following more than a decade of negotiations, the Canada‐United States Agreement on Air Quality entered into force on March 13, 1991, with the signatures of then‐Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and US. President George Bush. Why was it so difficult for Canadian and US. negotiators to reach agreement? I argue that Canadian and U.S. domestic politics were the primary impediments to resolving the U.S.‐Canada acid rain dispute. This article thus casts the dispute in terms of a pair of domestic environmental policy problems, whose timely and complementary solution, furthermore, required executive initiative as the handmaiden of ecological crisis. Heightened public concern about the threat of acidic air pollution in Canada prompted Mulroney's efforts to reduce acid rain. In the United States, a likewise critical change in the public's perception of air quality as a national emergency created the mass support necessary for Bush's federal acid rain control initiative</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-292X
ispartof Policy studies journal, 1999-01, Vol.27 (2), p.347-359
issn 0190-292X
1541-0072
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20006042
source Criminology Collection; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Acid rain
Agreement
Agreements
Air Pollution
AIR QUALITY
ATTITUDES
Canada
Coal-fired power plants
Comparative studies
Conflicts of interest
Emissions
ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY
Environmental impact
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Industrial plant emissions
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Metallurgy
Negotiations
Outdoor air quality
POLITICAL ASPECTS
Politics
Pollutants
Presidents
Prime ministers
PUBLIC OPINION
Regulation
Sulfur
United States
title Fortuitous Consequence: The Domestic Politics of the 1991 Canada-United States Agreement on Air Quality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A20%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fortuitous%20Consequence:%20The%20Domestic%20Politics%20of%20the%201991%20Canada-United%20States%20Agreement%20on%20Air%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Policy%20studies%20journal&rft.au=Allison,%20Juliann%20Emmons&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=347-359&rft.issn=0190-292X&rft.eissn=1541-0072&rft.coden=PSJOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E44561404%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4997-24c679d5678f4d46df2339fb2092d5284ddd566136fceed561c214e09ebbe2fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300135985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true