Loading…

Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses

Risk and resilience assessments for critical infrastructure focus on myriad objectives, from natural hazard evaluations to optimizing investments. Although research has started to characterize externalities associated with current or possible future states, incorporation of equity priorities at proj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk analysis 2023-09
Main Authors: Gunda, Thushara, Wachtel, Amanda, Khadka Mishra, Shruti, Moog, Emily
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume
creator Gunda, Thushara
Wachtel, Amanda
Khadka Mishra, Shruti
Moog, Emily
description Risk and resilience assessments for critical infrastructure focus on myriad objectives, from natural hazard evaluations to optimizing investments. Although research has started to characterize externalities associated with current or possible future states, incorporation of equity priorities at project inception is increasingly being recognized as critical for planning related activities. However, there is no standard methodology that guides development of equity‐informed quantitative approaches for infrastructure planning activities. To address this gap, we introduce a logic model that can be tailored to capture nuances about specific geographies and community priorities, effectively incorporating them into different mathematical approaches for quantitative risk assessments. Specifically, the logic model uses a graded, iterative approach to clarify specific equity objectives as well as inform the development of equations being used to support analysis. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using case studies spanning aviation fuel, produced water, and microgrid electricity infrastructures. For each case study, the use of the logic model helps clarify the ways that local priorities and infrastructure needs are used to drive the types of data and quantitative methodologies used in the respective analyses. The explicit consideration of methodological limitations (e.g., data mismatches) and stakeholder engagements serves to increase the transparency of the associated findings as well as effectively integrate community nuances (e.g., ownership of assets) into infrastructure assessments. Such integration will become increasingly important to ensure that planning activities (which occur throughout the lifecycle of the infrastructure projects) lead to long‐lasting solutions to meet both energy and sustainable development goals for communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/risa.14230
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2007125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870993817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LxDAQxYMouK5e_ATBkwjVSdIm7VEW_8GCCHoO2XTqRrvpbpIK--1NXecyMPzem5lHyCWDW5brLrhoblnJBRyRGatEU8iGl8dkBlzxohSCn5KzGL8AGEClZqR9G41PLpnkfpCa7TYMxq4x0m4I1Hnbj63znxR3o0v7PKB5wzc1vqUBo-sdeot53AUTUxhtGgPSbW-8n1TGm34fMZ6Tk870ES_--5x8PD68L56L5evTy-J-WVjBVSpsZ3mNUkDTtbysmFxJW3MANMJyWQsAISsopWlBYKPsqlpBbbKCNSBVVYk5uTr4DjE5Ha1LaNd28B5t0tlIMT5B1wcov7obMSa9cdFin4_GYYya1wqaRtRMZfTmgNowxBiw09vgNibsNQM95a2nvPVf3uIXdeh0Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870993817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Gunda, Thushara ; Wachtel, Amanda ; Khadka Mishra, Shruti ; Moog, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunda, Thushara ; Wachtel, Amanda ; Khadka Mishra, Shruti ; Moog, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>Risk and resilience assessments for critical infrastructure focus on myriad objectives, from natural hazard evaluations to optimizing investments. Although research has started to characterize externalities associated with current or possible future states, incorporation of equity priorities at project inception is increasingly being recognized as critical for planning related activities. However, there is no standard methodology that guides development of equity‐informed quantitative approaches for infrastructure planning activities. To address this gap, we introduce a logic model that can be tailored to capture nuances about specific geographies and community priorities, effectively incorporating them into different mathematical approaches for quantitative risk assessments. Specifically, the logic model uses a graded, iterative approach to clarify specific equity objectives as well as inform the development of equations being used to support analysis. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using case studies spanning aviation fuel, produced water, and microgrid electricity infrastructures. For each case study, the use of the logic model helps clarify the ways that local priorities and infrastructure needs are used to drive the types of data and quantitative methodologies used in the respective analyses. The explicit consideration of methodological limitations (e.g., data mismatches) and stakeholder engagements serves to increase the transparency of the associated findings as well as effectively integrate community nuances (e.g., ownership of assets) into infrastructure assessments. Such integration will become increasingly important to ensure that planning activities (which occur throughout the lifecycle of the infrastructure projects) lead to long‐lasting solutions to meet both energy and sustainable development goals for communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.14230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2023-09</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1945-4064 ; 0000000319454064</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/2007125$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunda, Thushara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachtel, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khadka Mishra, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moog, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses</title><title>Risk analysis</title><description>Risk and resilience assessments for critical infrastructure focus on myriad objectives, from natural hazard evaluations to optimizing investments. Although research has started to characterize externalities associated with current or possible future states, incorporation of equity priorities at project inception is increasingly being recognized as critical for planning related activities. However, there is no standard methodology that guides development of equity‐informed quantitative approaches for infrastructure planning activities. To address this gap, we introduce a logic model that can be tailored to capture nuances about specific geographies and community priorities, effectively incorporating them into different mathematical approaches for quantitative risk assessments. Specifically, the logic model uses a graded, iterative approach to clarify specific equity objectives as well as inform the development of equations being used to support analysis. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using case studies spanning aviation fuel, produced water, and microgrid electricity infrastructures. For each case study, the use of the logic model helps clarify the ways that local priorities and infrastructure needs are used to drive the types of data and quantitative methodologies used in the respective analyses. The explicit consideration of methodological limitations (e.g., data mismatches) and stakeholder engagements serves to increase the transparency of the associated findings as well as effectively integrate community nuances (e.g., ownership of assets) into infrastructure assessments. Such integration will become increasingly important to ensure that planning activities (which occur throughout the lifecycle of the infrastructure projects) lead to long‐lasting solutions to meet both energy and sustainable development goals for communities.</description><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LxDAQxYMouK5e_ATBkwjVSdIm7VEW_8GCCHoO2XTqRrvpbpIK--1NXecyMPzem5lHyCWDW5brLrhoblnJBRyRGatEU8iGl8dkBlzxohSCn5KzGL8AGEClZqR9G41PLpnkfpCa7TYMxq4x0m4I1Hnbj63znxR3o0v7PKB5wzc1vqUBo-sdeot53AUTUxhtGgPSbW-8n1TGm34fMZ6Tk870ES_--5x8PD68L56L5evTy-J-WVjBVSpsZ3mNUkDTtbysmFxJW3MANMJyWQsAISsopWlBYKPsqlpBbbKCNSBVVYk5uTr4DjE5Ha1LaNd28B5t0tlIMT5B1wcov7obMSa9cdFin4_GYYya1wqaRtRMZfTmgNowxBiw09vgNibsNQM95a2nvPVf3uIXdeh0Qw</recordid><startdate>20230929</startdate><enddate>20230929</enddate><creator>Gunda, Thushara</creator><creator>Wachtel, Amanda</creator><creator>Khadka Mishra, Shruti</creator><creator>Moog, Emily</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-4064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000319454064</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230929</creationdate><title>Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses</title><author>Gunda, Thushara ; Wachtel, Amanda ; Khadka Mishra, Shruti ; Moog, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunda, Thushara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wachtel, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khadka Mishra, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moog, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunda, Thushara</au><au>Wachtel, Amanda</au><au>Khadka Mishra, Shruti</au><au>Moog, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><date>2023-09-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Risk and resilience assessments for critical infrastructure focus on myriad objectives, from natural hazard evaluations to optimizing investments. Although research has started to characterize externalities associated with current or possible future states, incorporation of equity priorities at project inception is increasingly being recognized as critical for planning related activities. However, there is no standard methodology that guides development of equity‐informed quantitative approaches for infrastructure planning activities. To address this gap, we introduce a logic model that can be tailored to capture nuances about specific geographies and community priorities, effectively incorporating them into different mathematical approaches for quantitative risk assessments. Specifically, the logic model uses a graded, iterative approach to clarify specific equity objectives as well as inform the development of equations being used to support analysis. We demonstrate the utility of this framework using case studies spanning aviation fuel, produced water, and microgrid electricity infrastructures. For each case study, the use of the logic model helps clarify the ways that local priorities and infrastructure needs are used to drive the types of data and quantitative methodologies used in the respective analyses. The explicit consideration of methodological limitations (e.g., data mismatches) and stakeholder engagements serves to increase the transparency of the associated findings as well as effectively integrate community nuances (e.g., ownership of assets) into infrastructure assessments. Such integration will become increasingly important to ensure that planning activities (which occur throughout the lifecycle of the infrastructure projects) lead to long‐lasting solutions to meet both energy and sustainable development goals for communities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><doi>10.1111/risa.14230</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-4064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000319454064</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 2023-09
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2007125
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
title Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A48%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20approaches%20for%20including%20equity%20in%20risk%20and%20resilience%20infrastructure%20planning%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Gunda,%20Thushara&rft.date=2023-09-29&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.14230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2870993817%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-cfc28e6309fd24516b6c8200ea3c268300365046ad03e97cb5b08a8e619067553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870993817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true