Assessment of Gaussian-3 and density functional theories for a larger experimental test set

The G2/97 test set [J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1063 (1997)] for assessing quantum chemical methods used to predict thermochemical data is expanded to include 75 additional enthalpies of formation of larger molecules. This new set, referred to as the G3/99 test set, includes enthalpies of formation, ionizat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of chemical physics 2000-05, Vol.112 (17), p.7374-7383
Main Authors: Curtiss, Larry A., Raghavachari, Krishnan, Redfern, Paul C., Pople, John A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AFFINITY
ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS
ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
FORMATION FREE ENTHALPY
FORMATION HEAT
HYDROCARBONS
IONIZATION POTENTIAL
THEORETICAL DATA
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The G2/97 test set [J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1063 (1997)] for assessing quantum chemical methods used to predict thermochemical data is expanded to include 75 additional enthalpies of formation of larger molecules. This new set, referred to as the G3/99 test set, includes enthalpies of formation, ionization potentials, electron affinities, and proton affinities in the G2/97 set and 75 new enthalpies of formation. The total number of energies in the G3/99 set is 376. Overall, G3 theory has a mean absolute deviation of 1.07 kcal/mol for the G3/99 test set and does about as well for the new hydrocarbons and substituted hydrocarbons as it does for those in the G2/97 test. However, G3 theory has large deviations for several of the new nonhydrogen systems in the G3/99 test set such as SF6 and PF5. Part of the source of error is traced to the inadequate geometries used in G3 theory for these molecules. Other variations of G3 theory are also assessed such as G3(MP2), G3(MP3), and the versions of G3 theory using scaled energy terms instead of the higher level correction. These variations also do well for the larger hydrocarbons and substituted hydrocarbons, but fail for the same nonhydrogen systems as G3 theory. The density functional methods assessed in this study, including the hybrid B3LYP method, all have much larger deviations from experiment for the new enthalpies of formation in the expanded test set; the mean absolute deviation more than doubles compared to that for the enthalpies in the G2/97 test set. This is due to a cumulative effect of the errors in the larger molecules in the density functional methods.
ISSN:0021-9606
1089-7690
DOI:10.1063/1.481336