Loading…

Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B

A study of the reaction {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B in parallel kinematics has been made for the missing-momentum region 250

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Physical review. C, Nuclear physics Nuclear physics, 2005-01, Vol.71 (1)
Main Authors:	Morrow, S.A., Arneil, J., Branford, D., Davinson, T., Liang, M., Mackenzie, J., Aschenauer, E.C., Batenburg, M.F. van, Blok, H.P., Boersma, D.J., Hesselink, W.H.A., Groep, D., Hicks, K., Lapikas, L., Sambeek, M. van, Starink, R., Steenhoven, G. van der, Uden, M.A. van, Vries, H. de, Meyer, G. de
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	ALGEBRAIC CURRENTS BORON 11 BOSON-EXCHANGE MODELS CARBON 12 TARGET COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS CROSS SECTIONS ELECTRON REACTIONS FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS MEV RANGE NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS PHOTONUCLEAR REACTIONS STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS TWO-BODY PROBLEM
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue	1
container_start_page
container_title	Physical review. C, Nuclear physics
container_volume	71
creator	Morrow, S.A. Arneil, J. Branford, D. Davinson, T. Liang, M. Mackenzie, J. Aschenauer, E.C. Batenburg, M.F. van Blok, H.P. Boersma, D.J. Hesselink, W.H.A. Groep, D. Hicks, K. Lapikas, L. Sambeek, M. van Starink, R. Steenhoven, G. van der Uden, M.A. van Vries, H. de Meyer, G. de
description	A study of the reaction {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B in parallel kinematics has been made for the missing-momentum region 250
doi_str_mv	10.1103/PhysRevC.71.014607
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20695889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20695889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-o98t-4523e5b8fee5cf085fdf9606a7b42a7bebf7c94871f391ca36d782a19decc4133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTM1LwzAcDaLgnP4DngIeVFhn0jRpcnTFLxgosoO3kaa_2IpLShMnMurfbtk87B3e433wEDqnZEopYTcv9U94hXUxzemU0EyQ_ACNKJEqyRR5O0QjwrlIUknZMToJ4YMMYEyM0G_hV63umuAdLiF-Azgca8Cx0y6soQuAOwitdwEC9nbbdaBNbIYIb8JXi2naF1cwga257NvrXUr7Gdau2tts3vVqpfvJ3uIUHVn9GeDsX8docX-3KB6T-fPDU3E7T7ySMcl4yoCX0gJwY4nktrJKEKHzMksHgtLmRmUyp5YpajQTVS5TTVUFxmSUsTG62N36EJtlME0EUxvvHJi4TIlQXErF_gCOEWM3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B</title><source>American Physical Society:Jisc Collections:APS Read and Publish 2023-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Morrow, S.A. ; Arneil, J. ; Branford, D. ; Davinson, T. ; Liang, M. ; Mackenzie, J. ; Aschenauer, E.C. ; Batenburg, M.F. van ; Blok, H.P. ; Boersma, D.J. ; Hesselink, W.H.A. ; Groep, D. ; Hicks, K. ; Lapikas, L. ; Sambeek, M. van ; Starink, R. ; Steenhoven, G. van der ; Uden, M.A. van ; Vries, H. de ; Meyer, G. de</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrow, S.A. ; Arneil, J. ; Branford, D. ; Davinson, T. ; Liang, M. ; Mackenzie, J. ; Aschenauer, E.C. ; Batenburg, M.F. van ; Blok, H.P. ; Boersma, D.J. ; Hesselink, W.H.A. ; Groep, D. ; Hicks, K. ; Lapikas, L. ; Sambeek, M. van ; Starink, R. ; Steenhoven, G. van der ; Uden, M.A. van ; Vries, H. de ; Meyer, G. de</creatorcontrib><description>A study of the reaction {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B in parallel kinematics has been made for the missing-momentum region 250<p{sub m}<310 MeV/c at incident energies of 379 and 585 MeV. A Rosenbluth separation of the cross sections was carried out to extract the longitudinal and transverse structure functions W{sub L} and W{sub T}. Calculations that include meson-exchange currents and isobar currents are seen to describe the data better than those using a one-body current only. For the first time, a comparison between the {sup 12}C({gamma},p) cross section and the transverse part of the {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p) cross section has been made versus an effective momentum that is defined in such a way as to minimize effects due to differences in final-state interactions. This comparison suggests that it may be possible to describe both reactions in one consistent framework if two-body currents are included.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0556-2813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-490X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.014607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>ALGEBRAIC CURRENTS ; BORON 11 ; BOSON-EXCHANGE MODELS ; CARBON 12 TARGET ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; CROSS SECTIONS ; ELECTRON REACTIONS ; FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS ; MEV RANGE ; NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS ; PHOTONUCLEAR REACTIONS ; STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS ; TWO-BODY PROBLEM</subject><ispartof>Physical review. C, Nuclear physics, 2005-01, Vol.71 (1)</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20695889$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrow, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arneil, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branford, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davinson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschenauer, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batenburg, M.F. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesselink, W.H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groep, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapikas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambeek, M. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starink, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenhoven, G. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uden, M.A. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, H. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, G. de</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B</title><title>Physical review. C, Nuclear physics</title><description>A study of the reaction {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B in parallel kinematics has been made for the missing-momentum region 250<p{sub m}<310 MeV/c at incident energies of 379 and 585 MeV. A Rosenbluth separation of the cross sections was carried out to extract the longitudinal and transverse structure functions W{sub L} and W{sub T}. Calculations that include meson-exchange currents and isobar currents are seen to describe the data better than those using a one-body current only. For the first time, a comparison between the {sup 12}C({gamma},p) cross section and the transverse part of the {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p) cross section has been made versus an effective momentum that is defined in such a way as to minimize effects due to differences in final-state interactions. This comparison suggests that it may be possible to describe both reactions in one consistent framework if two-body currents are included.</description><subject>ALGEBRAIC CURRENTS</subject><subject>BORON 11</subject><subject>BOSON-EXCHANGE MODELS</subject><subject>CARBON 12 TARGET</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>CROSS SECTIONS</subject><subject>ELECTRON REACTIONS</subject><subject>FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS</subject><subject>MEV RANGE</subject><subject>NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS</subject><subject>PHOTONUCLEAR REACTIONS</subject><subject>STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>TWO-BODY PROBLEM</subject><issn>0556-2813</issn><issn>1089-490X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNTM1LwzAcDaLgnP4DngIeVFhn0jRpcnTFLxgosoO3kaa_2IpLShMnMurfbtk87B3e433wEDqnZEopYTcv9U94hXUxzemU0EyQ_ACNKJEqyRR5O0QjwrlIUknZMToJ4YMMYEyM0G_hV63umuAdLiF-Azgca8Cx0y6soQuAOwitdwEC9nbbdaBNbIYIb8JXi2naF1cwga257NvrXUr7Gdau2tts3vVqpfvJ3uIUHVn9GeDsX8docX-3KB6T-fPDU3E7T7ySMcl4yoCX0gJwY4nktrJKEKHzMksHgtLmRmUyp5YpajQTVS5TTVUFxmSUsTG62N36EJtlME0EUxvvHJi4TIlQXErF_gCOEWM3</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Morrow, S.A.</creator><creator>Arneil, J.</creator><creator>Branford, D.</creator><creator>Davinson, T.</creator><creator>Liang, M.</creator><creator>Mackenzie, J.</creator><creator>Aschenauer, E.C.</creator><creator>Batenburg, M.F. van</creator><creator>Blok, H.P.</creator><creator>Boersma, D.J.</creator><creator>Hesselink, W.H.A.</creator><creator>Groep, D.</creator><creator>Hicks, K.</creator><creator>Lapikas, L.</creator><creator>Sambeek, M. van</creator><creator>Starink, R.</creator><creator>Steenhoven, G. van der</creator><creator>Uden, M.A. van</creator><creator>Vries, H. de</creator><creator>Meyer, G. de</creator><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B</title><author>Morrow, S.A. ; Arneil, J. ; Branford, D. ; Davinson, T. ; Liang, M. ; Mackenzie, J. ; Aschenauer, E.C. ; Batenburg, M.F. van ; Blok, H.P. ; Boersma, D.J. ; Hesselink, W.H.A. ; Groep, D. ; Hicks, K. ; Lapikas, L. ; Sambeek, M. van ; Starink, R. ; Steenhoven, G. van der ; Uden, M.A. van ; Vries, H. de ; Meyer, G. de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o98t-4523e5b8fee5cf085fdf9606a7b42a7bebf7c94871f391ca36d782a19decc4133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ALGEBRAIC CURRENTS</topic><topic>BORON 11</topic><topic>BOSON-EXCHANGE MODELS</topic><topic>CARBON 12 TARGET</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>CROSS SECTIONS</topic><topic>ELECTRON REACTIONS</topic><topic>FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS</topic><topic>MEV RANGE</topic><topic>NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS</topic><topic>PHOTONUCLEAR REACTIONS</topic><topic>STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>TWO-BODY PROBLEM</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrow, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arneil, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branford, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davinson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschenauer, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batenburg, M.F. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesselink, W.H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groep, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapikas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sambeek, M. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starink, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenhoven, G. van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uden, M.A. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, H. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, G. de</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Physical review. C, Nuclear physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrow, S.A.</au><au>Arneil, J.</au><au>Branford, D.</au><au>Davinson, T.</au><au>Liang, M.</au><au>Mackenzie, J.</au><au>Aschenauer, E.C.</au><au>Batenburg, M.F. van</au><au>Blok, H.P.</au><au>Boersma, D.J.</au><au>Hesselink, W.H.A.</au><au>Groep, D.</au><au>Hicks, K.</au><au>Lapikas, L.</au><au>Sambeek, M. van</au><au>Starink, R.</au><au>Steenhoven, G. van der</au><au>Uden, M.A. van</au><au>Vries, H. de</au><au>Meyer, G. de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. C, Nuclear physics</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0556-2813</issn><eissn>1089-490X</eissn><abstract>A study of the reaction {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B in parallel kinematics has been made for the missing-momentum region 250<p{sub m}<310 MeV/c at incident energies of 379 and 585 MeV. A Rosenbluth separation of the cross sections was carried out to extract the longitudinal and transverse structure functions W{sub L} and W{sub T}. Calculations that include meson-exchange currents and isobar currents are seen to describe the data better than those using a one-body current only. For the first time, a comparison between the {sup 12}C({gamma},p) cross section and the transverse part of the {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p) cross section has been made versus an effective momentum that is defined in such a way as to minimize effects due to differences in final-state interactions. This comparison suggests that it may be possible to describe both reactions in one consistent framework if two-body currents are included.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1103/PhysRevC.71.014607</doi></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0556-2813
ispartof	Physical review. C, Nuclear physics, 2005-01, Vol.71 (1)
issn	0556-2813 1089-490X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20695889
source	American Physical Society:Jisc Collections:APS Read and Publish 2023-2025 (reading list)
subjects	ALGEBRAIC CURRENTS BORON 11 BOSON-EXCHANGE MODELS CARBON 12 TARGET COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS CROSS SECTIONS ELECTRON REACTIONS FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS MEV RANGE NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS PHOTONUCLEAR REACTIONS STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS TWO-BODY PROBLEM
title	Comparison between the transverse responses of the reactions {sup 12}C(e,e{sup '}p){sup 11}B and {sup 12}C({gamma},p){sup 11}B
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20the%20transverse%20responses%20of%20the%20reactions%20%7Bsup%2012%7DC(e,e%7Bsup%20'%7Dp)%7Bsup%2011%7DB%20and%20%7Bsup%2012%7DC(%7Bgamma%7D,p)%7Bsup%2011%7DB&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20C,%20Nuclear%20physics&rft.au=Morrow,%20S.A.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0556-2813&rft.eissn=1089-490X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.014607&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E20695889%3C/osti%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o98t-4523e5b8fee5cf085fdf9606a7b42a7bebf7c94871f391ca36d782a19decc4133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true