An analysis of the theoretical rationale for using strategic environmental assessment to deliver environmental justice in the light of the Scottish Environmental Assessment Act

The different ways in which its territorial jurisdictions have chosen to apply the European Union's (EU's) Directive on strategic environmental assessment (SEA) to their public sector policies, plans and programmes (PPPs) suggest that the United Kingdom (UK) continues to be uncertain about...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental impact assessment review 2007-10, Vol.27 (7), p.607-623
Main Authors: Jackson, Tony, Illsley, Barbara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
COST ESTIMATION
Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
Environmental impact studies
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Environmental justice
Environmental law
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
EUROPEAN UNION
European Union SEA directive
Justice
LEGAL ASPECTS
LEGISLATION
Scotland
Strategic Environmental Assessment
Strategic planning
Sustainability
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
UNITED KINGDOM
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The different ways in which its territorial jurisdictions have chosen to apply the European Union's (EU's) Directive on strategic environmental assessment (SEA) to their public sector policies, plans and programmes (PPPs) suggest that the United Kingdom (UK) continues to be uncertain about the theoretical rationale for this technique. In order to evaluate the analytical significance of these alternative interpretations, their methodological foundations need to be examined. Baseline-led approaches to SEA which are intended to operationalise sustainability can be shown to place unrealistic expectations on instrumental rationality. Objectives-led policy appraisal makes SEA contingent on whatever particular social construction of sustainable development holds sway. These expert-driven approaches contrast with a reflexive interpretation of environmental governance, in which SEA helps to expose the conflictual nature of public actions claiming to deliver sustainability, and offers stakeholders increased opportunities to challenge these. The approach adopted in Scotland, in which SEA forms part of an agenda for environmental justice, is evaluated in the light of this critique. The Scottish Executive's eclectic legislation, which covers all its public sector PPPs, may offer a way of mediating between these competing interpretations of SEA.
ISSN:0195-9255
1873-6432
DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.004