Routine urine culture at the time of percutaneous urinary drainage: does every patient need one?

• Published in: Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2006-08, Vol.29 (4), p.595-598
• Main Authors: Brody, L A, Brown, K T, Covey, A M, Brown, A E, Getrajdman, G I
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Candida - isolation & purification; Candida glabrata - isolation & purification; COST; Cystectomy - methods; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; DRAINAGE; Drainage - methods; Female; Humans; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; PATIENTS; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; Urinalysis; Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis; URINE; VASCULAR DISEASES
• ISSN: 0174-1551; 1432-086X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0096-y

To determine the clinical variables associated with bacteriuria in patients undergoing primary percutaneous antegrade urinary drainage procedures in order to predict the utility of routinely obtaining urine cultures at the time of the procedure. Between October 1995 and March 1998 urine cultures were prospectively obtained in all patients undergoing a primary percutaneous antegrade urinary drainage procedure. One hundred and eighty-seven patients underwent 264 procedures. Results were available in 252 cases. Culture results were correlated with clinical, laboratory, and demographic variables. Anaerobic cultures were not uniformly performed. Urine cultures were positive in 24 of 252 (9.5%) cases. An indwelling or recently removed ipsilateral device (catheter or stent) and a history of previous cystectomy with urinary diversion were significant predictors of a positive culture. Patients without either of these predictors, and without clinical or laboratory evidence of infection, were rarely found to have positive cultures. The likelihood of a positive urine culture can be predicted on the basis of the aforementioned clinical variables. In the absence of these clinical indicators routine urine cultures are neither useful nor cost-effective.