Loading…
Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient?
Compared to in-flight facilities, Isotope Separator On-Line ones can in principle produce significantly higher radioactive ion beam intensities. On the other hand, they have to cope with delays for the release and ionization which make the production of short-lived isotopes ion beams of reactive and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of scientific instruments 2014-02, Vol.85 (2), p.02A504-02A504 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3 |
container_end_page | 02A504 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 02A504 |
container_title | Review of scientific instruments |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Maunoury, L Delahaye, P Angot, J Dubois, M Dupuis, M Frigot, R Grinyer, J Jardin, P Leboucher, C Lamy, T |
description | Compared to in-flight facilities, Isotope Separator On-Line ones can in principle produce significantly higher radioactive ion beam intensities. On the other hand, they have to cope with delays for the release and ionization which make the production of short-lived isotopes ion beams of reactive and refractory elements particularly difficult. Many efforts are focused on extending the capabilities of ISOL facilities to those challenging beams. In this context, the development of carbon beams is triggering interest [H. Frånberg, M. Ammann, H. W. Gäggeler, and U. Köster, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 03A708 (2006); M. Kronberger, A. Gottberg, T. M. Mendonca, J. P. Ramos, C. Seiffert, P. Suominen, and T. Stora, in Proceedings of the EMIS 2012 [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B Production of molecular sideband radioisotope beams at CERN-ISOLDE using a Helicon-type plasma ion source (to be published)]: despite its refractory nature, radioactive carbon beams can be produced from molecules (CO or CO2), which can subsequently be broken up and multi-ionized to the required charge state in charge breeders or ECR sources. This contribution will present results of experiments conducted at LPSC with the Phoenix charge breeder and at GANIL with the Nanogan ECR ion source for the ionization of carbon beams in the frame of the ENSAR and EMILIE projects. Carbon is to date the lightest condensable element charge bred with an ECR ion source. Charge breeding efficiencies will be compared with those obtained using Nanogan ECRIS and charge breeding times will be presented as well. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.4828374 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22254130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2129508012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1P3DAQhi1UBFvaA38AWeqFHkI9Hjt2uCCESkFaqVU_zpbjHStGmwRiR4h_T6rd0rnMYR49o5mXsVMQFyBq_AIXykqLRh2wFQjbVKaW-I6thEBV1UbZY_Y-5wexlAY4YsdS6QaVNCu2vp3LPBEPfmrHgbfk-8x94b9-3P-8XgOPPqRtKi-X_LlLoeM9lW7c8JR56Yj3Yy6cYkwh0VCuPrDD6LeZPu77Cftz-_X3zV21_v7t_uZ6XQU0plTa-41oA1gRUbUUCOtoFVmIXkgC5ZVpNCC2ra-N0Rh8E6VCNM0yFuTxhH3aeZf1yeWQCoUujMNAoTgppVaAYqHOd9TjND7NlIvrUw603fqBxjk70EIZtEbp_8I39GGcp2G5wUmQjRZWgFyozzsqTGPOE0X3OKXeTy8OhPsbhAO3D2Jhz_bGue1p80b--zy-AlbTfu0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2129508012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient?</title><source>American Institute of Physics (AIP) Publications</source><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Maunoury, L ; Delahaye, P ; Angot, J ; Dubois, M ; Dupuis, M ; Frigot, R ; Grinyer, J ; Jardin, P ; Leboucher, C ; Lamy, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Maunoury, L ; Delahaye, P ; Angot, J ; Dubois, M ; Dupuis, M ; Frigot, R ; Grinyer, J ; Jardin, P ; Leboucher, C ; Lamy, T</creatorcontrib><description>Compared to in-flight facilities, Isotope Separator On-Line ones can in principle produce significantly higher radioactive ion beam intensities. On the other hand, they have to cope with delays for the release and ionization which make the production of short-lived isotopes ion beams of reactive and refractory elements particularly difficult. Many efforts are focused on extending the capabilities of ISOL facilities to those challenging beams. In this context, the development of carbon beams is triggering interest [H. Frånberg, M. Ammann, H. W. Gäggeler, and U. Köster, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 03A708 (2006); M. Kronberger, A. Gottberg, T. M. Mendonca, J. P. Ramos, C. Seiffert, P. Suominen, and T. Stora, in Proceedings of the EMIS 2012 [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B Production of molecular sideband radioisotope beams at CERN-ISOLDE using a Helicon-type plasma ion source (to be published)]: despite its refractory nature, radioactive carbon beams can be produced from molecules (CO or CO2), which can subsequently be broken up and multi-ionized to the required charge state in charge breeders or ECR sources. This contribution will present results of experiments conducted at LPSC with the Phoenix charge breeder and at GANIL with the Nanogan ECR ion source for the ionization of carbon beams in the frame of the ENSAR and EMILIE projects. Carbon is to date the lightest condensable element charge bred with an ECR ion source. Charge breeding efficiencies will be compared with those obtained using Nanogan ECRIS and charge breeding times will be presented as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4828374</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24593427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>BREEDING ; CARBON ; CARBON DIOXIDE ; CARBON MONOXIDE ; CHARGE STATES ; ECR ION SOURCES ; ELECTRON CYCLOTRON-RESONANCE ; GANIL CYCLOTRON ; ISOTOPE SEPARATORS ; PARTICLE ACCELERATORS ; PLASMA ; RADIOACTIVE ION BEAMS ; RADIOISOTOPES ; Scientific apparatus & instruments</subject><ispartof>Review of scientific instruments, 2014-02, Vol.85 (2), p.02A504-02A504</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Physics Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,780,782,883,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24593427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22254130$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maunoury, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahaye, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angot, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigot, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leboucher, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, T</creatorcontrib><title>Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient?</title><title>Review of scientific instruments</title><addtitle>Rev Sci Instrum</addtitle><description>Compared to in-flight facilities, Isotope Separator On-Line ones can in principle produce significantly higher radioactive ion beam intensities. On the other hand, they have to cope with delays for the release and ionization which make the production of short-lived isotopes ion beams of reactive and refractory elements particularly difficult. Many efforts are focused on extending the capabilities of ISOL facilities to those challenging beams. In this context, the development of carbon beams is triggering interest [H. Frånberg, M. Ammann, H. W. Gäggeler, and U. Köster, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 03A708 (2006); M. Kronberger, A. Gottberg, T. M. Mendonca, J. P. Ramos, C. Seiffert, P. Suominen, and T. Stora, in Proceedings of the EMIS 2012 [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B Production of molecular sideband radioisotope beams at CERN-ISOLDE using a Helicon-type plasma ion source (to be published)]: despite its refractory nature, radioactive carbon beams can be produced from molecules (CO or CO2), which can subsequently be broken up and multi-ionized to the required charge state in charge breeders or ECR sources. This contribution will present results of experiments conducted at LPSC with the Phoenix charge breeder and at GANIL with the Nanogan ECR ion source for the ionization of carbon beams in the frame of the ENSAR and EMILIE projects. Carbon is to date the lightest condensable element charge bred with an ECR ion source. Charge breeding efficiencies will be compared with those obtained using Nanogan ECRIS and charge breeding times will be presented as well.</description><subject>BREEDING</subject><subject>CARBON</subject><subject>CARBON DIOXIDE</subject><subject>CARBON MONOXIDE</subject><subject>CHARGE STATES</subject><subject>ECR ION SOURCES</subject><subject>ELECTRON CYCLOTRON-RESONANCE</subject><subject>GANIL CYCLOTRON</subject><subject>ISOTOPE SEPARATORS</subject><subject>PARTICLE ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>PLASMA</subject><subject>RADIOACTIVE ION BEAMS</subject><subject>RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>Scientific apparatus & instruments</subject><issn>0034-6748</issn><issn>1089-7623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkU1P3DAQhi1UBFvaA38AWeqFHkI9Hjt2uCCESkFaqVU_zpbjHStGmwRiR4h_T6rd0rnMYR49o5mXsVMQFyBq_AIXykqLRh2wFQjbVKaW-I6thEBV1UbZY_Y-5wexlAY4YsdS6QaVNCu2vp3LPBEPfmrHgbfk-8x94b9-3P-8XgOPPqRtKi-X_LlLoeM9lW7c8JR56Yj3Yy6cYkwh0VCuPrDD6LeZPu77Cftz-_X3zV21_v7t_uZ6XQU0plTa-41oA1gRUbUUCOtoFVmIXkgC5ZVpNCC2ra-N0Rh8E6VCNM0yFuTxhH3aeZf1yeWQCoUujMNAoTgppVaAYqHOd9TjND7NlIvrUw603fqBxjk70EIZtEbp_8I39GGcp2G5wUmQjRZWgFyozzsqTGPOE0X3OKXeTy8OhPsbhAO3D2Jhz_bGue1p80b--zy-AlbTfu0</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Maunoury, L</creator><creator>Delahaye, P</creator><creator>Angot, J</creator><creator>Dubois, M</creator><creator>Dupuis, M</creator><creator>Frigot, R</creator><creator>Grinyer, J</creator><creator>Jardin, P</creator><creator>Leboucher, C</creator><creator>Lamy, T</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient?</title><author>Maunoury, L ; Delahaye, P ; Angot, J ; Dubois, M ; Dupuis, M ; Frigot, R ; Grinyer, J ; Jardin, P ; Leboucher, C ; Lamy, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>BREEDING</topic><topic>CARBON</topic><topic>CARBON DIOXIDE</topic><topic>CARBON MONOXIDE</topic><topic>CHARGE STATES</topic><topic>ECR ION SOURCES</topic><topic>ELECTRON CYCLOTRON-RESONANCE</topic><topic>GANIL CYCLOTRON</topic><topic>ISOTOPE SEPARATORS</topic><topic>PARTICLE ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>PLASMA</topic><topic>RADIOACTIVE ION BEAMS</topic><topic>RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>Scientific apparatus & instruments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maunoury, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delahaye, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angot, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigot, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyer, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leboucher, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, T</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Review of scientific instruments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maunoury, L</au><au>Delahaye, P</au><au>Angot, J</au><au>Dubois, M</au><au>Dupuis, M</au><au>Frigot, R</au><au>Grinyer, J</au><au>Jardin, P</au><au>Leboucher, C</au><au>Lamy, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient?</atitle><jtitle>Review of scientific instruments</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Sci Instrum</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>02A504</spage><epage>02A504</epage><pages>02A504-02A504</pages><issn>0034-6748</issn><eissn>1089-7623</eissn><abstract>Compared to in-flight facilities, Isotope Separator On-Line ones can in principle produce significantly higher radioactive ion beam intensities. On the other hand, they have to cope with delays for the release and ionization which make the production of short-lived isotopes ion beams of reactive and refractory elements particularly difficult. Many efforts are focused on extending the capabilities of ISOL facilities to those challenging beams. In this context, the development of carbon beams is triggering interest [H. Frånberg, M. Ammann, H. W. Gäggeler, and U. Köster, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 03A708 (2006); M. Kronberger, A. Gottberg, T. M. Mendonca, J. P. Ramos, C. Seiffert, P. Suominen, and T. Stora, in Proceedings of the EMIS 2012 [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B Production of molecular sideband radioisotope beams at CERN-ISOLDE using a Helicon-type plasma ion source (to be published)]: despite its refractory nature, radioactive carbon beams can be produced from molecules (CO or CO2), which can subsequently be broken up and multi-ionized to the required charge state in charge breeders or ECR sources. This contribution will present results of experiments conducted at LPSC with the Phoenix charge breeder and at GANIL with the Nanogan ECR ion source for the ionization of carbon beams in the frame of the ENSAR and EMILIE projects. Carbon is to date the lightest condensable element charge bred with an ECR ion source. Charge breeding efficiencies will be compared with those obtained using Nanogan ECRIS and charge breeding times will be presented as well.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>24593427</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4828374</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6748 |
ispartof | Review of scientific instruments, 2014-02, Vol.85 (2), p.02A504-02A504 |
issn | 0034-6748 1089-7623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22254130 |
source | American Institute of Physics (AIP) Publications; American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | BREEDING CARBON CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON MONOXIDE CHARGE STATES ECR ION SOURCES ELECTRON CYCLOTRON-RESONANCE GANIL CYCLOTRON ISOTOPE SEPARATORS PARTICLE ACCELERATORS PLASMA RADIOACTIVE ION BEAMS RADIOISOTOPES Scientific apparatus & instruments |
title | Future carbon beams at SPIRAL1 facility: which method is the most efficient? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Future%20carbon%20beams%20at%20SPIRAL1%20facility:%20which%20method%20is%20the%20most%20efficient?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20scientific%20instruments&rft.au=Maunoury,%20L&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=02A504&rft.epage=02A504&rft.pages=02A504-02A504&rft.issn=0034-6748&rft.eissn=1089-7623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4828374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2129508012%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5aad0bc180f34bece36f84e81fa02e14a4795133bba67753ca9f24337902e0ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2129508012&rft_id=info:pmid/24593427&rfr_iscdi=true |