Loading…
Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics
Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 1685 |
creator | Peruzzini, D. Viti, J. Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam Tortoli, P. Verweij, M. D. Jong, N. de Vos, H. J. Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft |
description | Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, >38 dB, and >32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.4934406 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22492635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2123849733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjktLAzEYRYMoOFYX_oOA66n5kkwe7qRoVQqCWHA35DXtlGlSJ5n_b0XF1b1cDpeD0DWQORDBbmHONeOciBNUQdNALQWIU1QRonlNOfs4Rxc57wihWkpVoZf1UEaT0xQ9dil-94LNJsSC-73Z9HFzh9-CGerS78PfhFOHyzbgPB3CuDXjPsXe5Ut01pkhh6vfnKH148P74qlevS6fF_er2lElSq2gI11ngNvOy0ZbxS1IZwl4K62Q1EovmVbUyOA9eK7BKSKN8aKhrBGGzdDNz2_KpW-z60tw26N7DK60lHJNBWv-qcOYPqeQS7tL0xiPYi0FyhTXkjH2BdcgWg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2123849733</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creator><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, >38 dB, and >32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4934406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Acoustic noise ; ANIMAL TISSUES ; Beamforming ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; CAVITIES ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; Computer simulation ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; Contrast agents ; CONTRAST MEDIA ; Data acquisition ; DETECTION ; HARMONICS ; Higher harmonics ; Imaging ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; NOISE ; Noise levels ; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS ; PHANTOMS ; Radio frequency ; RADIOWAVE RADIATION ; Real time ; REAL TIME SYSTEMS ; SCATTERING ; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO ; SIGNALS ; Superharmonics ; Ultrasonic imaging ; ULTRASONOGRAPHY ; WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2015, Vol.1685 (1)</ispartof><rights>2015 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22492635$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viti, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortoli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, N. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, >38 dB, and >32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</description><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>Beamforming</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>CAVITIES</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>CONTRAST MEDIA</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>HARMONICS</subject><subject>Higher harmonics</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>NOISE</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>RADIOWAVE RADIATION</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>REAL TIME SYSTEMS</subject><subject>SCATTERING</subject><subject>SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO</subject><subject>SIGNALS</subject><subject>Superharmonics</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</subject><subject>WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjktLAzEYRYMoOFYX_oOA66n5kkwe7qRoVQqCWHA35DXtlGlSJ5n_b0XF1b1cDpeD0DWQORDBbmHONeOciBNUQdNALQWIU1QRonlNOfs4Rxc57wihWkpVoZf1UEaT0xQ9dil-94LNJsSC-73Z9HFzh9-CGerS78PfhFOHyzbgPB3CuDXjPsXe5Ut01pkhh6vfnKH148P74qlevS6fF_er2lElSq2gI11ngNvOy0ZbxS1IZwl4K62Q1EovmVbUyOA9eK7BKSKN8aKhrBGGzdDNz2_KpW-z60tw26N7DK60lHJNBWv-qcOYPqeQS7tL0xiPYi0FyhTXkjH2BdcgWg0</recordid><startdate>20151028</startdate><enddate>20151028</enddate><creator>Peruzzini, D.</creator><creator>Viti, J.</creator><creator>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creator><creator>Tortoli, P.</creator><creator>Verweij, M. D.</creator><creator>Jong, N. de</creator><creator>Vos, H. J.</creator><creator>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151028</creationdate><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><author>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>Beamforming</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>CAVITIES</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>CONTRAST MEDIA</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>HARMONICS</topic><topic>Higher harmonics</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>NOISE</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>RADIOWAVE RADIATION</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>REAL TIME SYSTEMS</topic><topic>SCATTERING</topic><topic>SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO</topic><topic>SIGNALS</topic><topic>Superharmonics</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</topic><topic>WAVE PROPAGATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viti, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortoli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, N. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peruzzini, D.</au><au>Viti, J.</au><au>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</au><au>Tortoli, P.</au><au>Verweij, M. D.</au><au>Jong, N. de</au><au>Vos, H. J.</au><au>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2015-10-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1685</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><abstract>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, >38 dB, and >32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.4934406</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2015, Vol.1685 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22492635 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Acoustic noise ANIMAL TISSUES Beamforming BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY CAVITIES COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS Computer simulation COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION Contrast agents CONTRAST MEDIA Data acquisition DETECTION HARMONICS Higher harmonics Imaging INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NOISE Noise levels NONLINEAR PROBLEMS PHANTOMS Radio frequency RADIOWAVE RADIATION Real time REAL TIME SYSTEMS SCATTERING SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO SIGNALS Superharmonics Ultrasonic imaging ULTRASONOGRAPHY WAVE PROPAGATION |
title | Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20contrast%20agent%20imaging:%20Real-time%20imaging%20of%20the%20superharmonics&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Peruzzini,%20D.&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.volume=1685&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4934406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2123849733%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123849733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |