Loading…

Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics

Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peruzzini, D., Viti, J., Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Tortoli, P., Verweij, M. D., Jong, N. de, Vos, H. J., Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 1685
creator Peruzzini, D.
Viti, J.
Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam
Tortoli, P.
Verweij, M. D.
Jong, N. de
Vos, H. J.
Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft
description Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, >38 dB, and >32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4934406
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22492635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2123849733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjktLAzEYRYMoOFYX_oOA66n5kkwe7qRoVQqCWHA35DXtlGlSJ5n_b0XF1b1cDpeD0DWQORDBbmHONeOciBNUQdNALQWIU1QRonlNOfs4Rxc57wihWkpVoZf1UEaT0xQ9dil-94LNJsSC-73Z9HFzh9-CGerS78PfhFOHyzbgPB3CuDXjPsXe5Ut01pkhh6vfnKH148P74qlevS6fF_er2lElSq2gI11ngNvOy0ZbxS1IZwl4K62Q1EovmVbUyOA9eK7BKSKN8aKhrBGGzdDNz2_KpW-z60tw26N7DK60lHJNBWv-qcOYPqeQS7tL0xiPYi0FyhTXkjH2BdcgWg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2123849733</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creator><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, &gt;38 dB, and &gt;32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4934406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Acoustic noise ; ANIMAL TISSUES ; Beamforming ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; CAVITIES ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; Computer simulation ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; Contrast agents ; CONTRAST MEDIA ; Data acquisition ; DETECTION ; HARMONICS ; Higher harmonics ; Imaging ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; NOISE ; Noise levels ; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS ; PHANTOMS ; Radio frequency ; RADIOWAVE RADIATION ; Real time ; REAL TIME SYSTEMS ; SCATTERING ; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO ; SIGNALS ; Superharmonics ; Ultrasonic imaging ; ULTRASONOGRAPHY ; WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2015, Vol.1685 (1)</ispartof><rights>2015 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22492635$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viti, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortoli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, N. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, &gt;38 dB, and &gt;32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</description><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>Beamforming</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>CAVITIES</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>Contrast agents</subject><subject>CONTRAST MEDIA</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>HARMONICS</subject><subject>Higher harmonics</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>NOISE</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>RADIOWAVE RADIATION</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>REAL TIME SYSTEMS</subject><subject>SCATTERING</subject><subject>SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO</subject><subject>SIGNALS</subject><subject>Superharmonics</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</subject><subject>WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjktLAzEYRYMoOFYX_oOA66n5kkwe7qRoVQqCWHA35DXtlGlSJ5n_b0XF1b1cDpeD0DWQORDBbmHONeOciBNUQdNALQWIU1QRonlNOfs4Rxc57wihWkpVoZf1UEaT0xQ9dil-94LNJsSC-73Z9HFzh9-CGerS78PfhFOHyzbgPB3CuDXjPsXe5Ut01pkhh6vfnKH148P74qlevS6fF_er2lElSq2gI11ngNvOy0ZbxS1IZwl4K62Q1EovmVbUyOA9eK7BKSKN8aKhrBGGzdDNz2_KpW-z60tw26N7DK60lHJNBWv-qcOYPqeQS7tL0xiPYi0FyhTXkjH2BdcgWg0</recordid><startdate>20151028</startdate><enddate>20151028</enddate><creator>Peruzzini, D.</creator><creator>Viti, J.</creator><creator>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creator><creator>Tortoli, P.</creator><creator>Verweij, M. D.</creator><creator>Jong, N. de</creator><creator>Vos, H. J.</creator><creator>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151028</creationdate><title>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</title><author>Peruzzini, D. ; Viti, J. ; Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam ; Tortoli, P. ; Verweij, M. D. ; Jong, N. de ; Vos, H. J. ; Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>Beamforming</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>CAVITIES</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>Contrast agents</topic><topic>CONTRAST MEDIA</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>HARMONICS</topic><topic>Higher harmonics</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>NOISE</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>RADIOWAVE RADIATION</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>REAL TIME SYSTEMS</topic><topic>SCATTERING</topic><topic>SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO</topic><topic>SIGNALS</topic><topic>Superharmonics</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</topic><topic>WAVE PROPAGATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peruzzini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viti, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortoli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verweij, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, N. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peruzzini, D.</au><au>Viti, J.</au><au>Erasmus MC, ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, Faculty Building, Ee 2302, 3015 CE Rotterdam</au><au>Tortoli, P.</au><au>Verweij, M. D.</au><au>Jong, N. de</au><au>Vos, H. J.</au><au>Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, ImPhys, Delft Univ Technology, van der Waalsweg 8, 2628 CH Delft</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2015-10-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1685</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><abstract>Currently, in medical ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) imaging the second harmonic scattering of the microbubbles is regularly used. This scattering is in competition with the signal that is caused by nonlinear wave propagation in tissue. It was reported that UCA imaging based on the third or higher harmonics, i.e. “superharmonic” imaging, shows better contrast. However, the superharmonic scattering has a lower signal level compared to e.g. second harmonic signals. This study investigates the contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of superharmonic UCA scattering in a tissue/vessel mimicking phantom using a real-time clinical scanner. Numerical simulations were performed to estimate the level of harmonics generated by the microbubbles. Data were acquired with a custom built dual-frequency cardiac phased array probe. Fundamental real-time images were produced while beam formed radiofrequency (RF) data was stored for further offline processing. The phantom consisted of a cavity filled with UCA surrounded by tissue mimicking material. The acoustic pressure in the cavity of the phantom was 110 kPa (MI = 0.11) ensuring non-destructivity of UCA. After processing of the acquired data from the phantom, the UCA-filled cavity could be clearly observed in the images, while tissue signals were suppressed at or below the noise floor. The measured CTR values were 36 dB, &gt;38 dB, and &gt;32 dB, for the second, third, and fourth harmonic respectively, which were in agreement with those reported earlier for preliminary contrast superharmonic imaging. The single frame SNR values (in which ‘signal’ denotes the signal level from the UCA area) were 23 dB, 18 dB, and 11 dB, respectively. This indicates that noise, and not the tissue signal, is the limiting factor for the UCA detection when using the superharmonics in nondestructive mode.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.4934406</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2015, Vol.1685 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22492635
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Acoustic noise
ANIMAL TISSUES
Beamforming
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
CAVITIES
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
Computer simulation
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
Contrast agents
CONTRAST MEDIA
Data acquisition
DETECTION
HARMONICS
Higher harmonics
Imaging
INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
NOISE
Noise levels
NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
PHANTOMS
Radio frequency
RADIOWAVE RADIATION
Real time
REAL TIME SYSTEMS
SCATTERING
SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO
SIGNALS
Superharmonics
Ultrasonic imaging
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
WAVE PROPAGATION
title Ultrasound contrast agent imaging: Real-time imaging of the superharmonics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20contrast%20agent%20imaging:%20Real-time%20imaging%20of%20the%20superharmonics&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Peruzzini,%20D.&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.volume=1685&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4934406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2123849733%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-81f0ffa14bfd759b84b17cb01db7b672b7d73982a7edd1d491c807aad652356a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123849733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true