Loading…

Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models

The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and verti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of chemical physics 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104
Main Authors: You, Zhi-Qiang, Mewes, Jan-Michael, Dreuw, Andreas, Herbert, John M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3
container_end_page 204104
container_issue 20
container_start_page 204104
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 143
creator You, Zhi-Qiang
Mewes, Jan-Michael
Dreuw, Andreas
Herbert, John M
description The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4936357
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22493266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1738814842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgwB9AlriARAfvbh-jEZsUBAc4W253teLQbU-8sP16upkhnOpQr56q6kPoKSUXlCj-ml4IwxWX-h7aUdKbTitD7qMdIYx2RhF1hh6VckMIoZqJh-iMKcW0EXqHfuzTcnA5lBRxmnC9BvzRZd8KdnHEn-Gby3jt11BDigWH-BfxKVb4WbeJmGIHty3MYcihLa_wIc2r77cbZug2LsTWFlzS_N1tDrykEebyGD2Y3Fzgyameo69v33zZv--uPr37sL-86jwXtHZmcpIwMlEDkyDKycEMwjNJ5Silc1JrEEb3wKZxnAzxMAFIcMM4cC6J9vwcPT96U6nBFh8q-Ot1rQi-WsbWv62_WKkXR-qQ022DUu0Siod5dhFSK5Zq3vdU9IL9F96hN6nluN5gGWW8J70yG_XySPmcSskw2UMOi8u_LCV2y8xSe8psZZ-djG1YYLwj_4XE_wDAeZIW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2123808692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>AIP Journals (American Institute of Physics)</source><creator>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</creator><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><description>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are &lt;0.2 eV (and often &lt;0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4936357</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26627947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Chemical partition ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; Computational chemistry ; Conductors ; Continuum modeling ; CORRECTIONS ; DIELECTRIC MATERIALS ; Dielectric polarization ; EQUILIBRIUM ; Equivalence ; EV RANGE ; EXCITATION ; Formulations ; FREE ENERGY ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS ; INTERCHANGEABILITY ; Ionization ; Mathematical models ; MOLECULES ; PARTITION ; Partitions ; PERTURBATION THEORY ; Physics ; POLARIZATION ; QUANTUM MECHANICS ; SOLUTES ; SOLUTIONS ; SOLVATION ; SOLVENTS</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104</ispartof><rights>2015 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,782,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22493266$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreuw, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are &lt;0.2 eV (and often &lt;0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</description><subject>Chemical partition</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>Computational chemistry</subject><subject>Conductors</subject><subject>Continuum modeling</subject><subject>CORRECTIONS</subject><subject>DIELECTRIC MATERIALS</subject><subject>Dielectric polarization</subject><subject>EQUILIBRIUM</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>EV RANGE</subject><subject>EXCITATION</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>FREE ENERGY</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>INTEGRAL EQUATIONS</subject><subject>INTERCHANGEABILITY</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MOLECULES</subject><subject>PARTITION</subject><subject>Partitions</subject><subject>PERTURBATION THEORY</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>POLARIZATION</subject><subject>QUANTUM MECHANICS</subject><subject>SOLUTES</subject><subject>SOLUTIONS</subject><subject>SOLVATION</subject><subject>SOLVENTS</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgwB9AlriARAfvbh-jEZsUBAc4W253teLQbU-8sP16upkhnOpQr56q6kPoKSUXlCj-ml4IwxWX-h7aUdKbTitD7qMdIYx2RhF1hh6VckMIoZqJh-iMKcW0EXqHfuzTcnA5lBRxmnC9BvzRZd8KdnHEn-Gby3jt11BDigWH-BfxKVb4WbeJmGIHty3MYcihLa_wIc2r77cbZug2LsTWFlzS_N1tDrykEebyGD2Y3Fzgyameo69v33zZv--uPr37sL-86jwXtHZmcpIwMlEDkyDKycEMwjNJ5Silc1JrEEb3wKZxnAzxMAFIcMM4cC6J9vwcPT96U6nBFh8q-Ot1rQi-WsbWv62_WKkXR-qQ022DUu0Siod5dhFSK5Zq3vdU9IL9F96hN6nluN5gGWW8J70yG_XySPmcSskw2UMOi8u_LCV2y8xSe8psZZ-djG1YYLwj_4XE_wDAeZIW</recordid><startdate>20151128</startdate><enddate>20151128</enddate><creator>You, Zhi-Qiang</creator><creator>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creator><creator>Dreuw, Andreas</creator><creator>Herbert, John M</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151128</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><author>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chemical partition</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>Computational chemistry</topic><topic>Conductors</topic><topic>Continuum modeling</topic><topic>CORRECTIONS</topic><topic>DIELECTRIC MATERIALS</topic><topic>Dielectric polarization</topic><topic>EQUILIBRIUM</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>EV RANGE</topic><topic>EXCITATION</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>FREE ENERGY</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>INTEGRAL EQUATIONS</topic><topic>INTERCHANGEABILITY</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MOLECULES</topic><topic>PARTITION</topic><topic>Partitions</topic><topic>PERTURBATION THEORY</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>POLARIZATION</topic><topic>QUANTUM MECHANICS</topic><topic>SOLUTES</topic><topic>SOLUTIONS</topic><topic>SOLVATION</topic><topic>SOLVENTS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreuw, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>You, Zhi-Qiang</au><au>Mewes, Jan-Michael</au><au>Dreuw, Andreas</au><au>Herbert, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2015-11-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>204104</spage><epage>204104</epage><pages>204104-204104</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><abstract>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are &lt;0.2 eV (and often &lt;0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>26627947</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4936357</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22493266
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); AIP Journals (American Institute of Physics)
subjects Chemical partition
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
Computational chemistry
Conductors
Continuum modeling
CORRECTIONS
DIELECTRIC MATERIALS
Dielectric polarization
EQUILIBRIUM
Equivalence
EV RANGE
EXCITATION
Formulations
FREE ENERGY
INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
INTERCHANGEABILITY
Ionization
Mathematical models
MOLECULES
PARTITION
Partitions
PERTURBATION THEORY
Physics
POLARIZATION
QUANTUM MECHANICS
SOLUTES
SOLUTIONS
SOLVATION
SOLVENTS
title Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Marcus%20and%20Pekar%20partitions%20in%20the%20context%20of%20non-equilibrium,%20polarizable-continuum%20solvation%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=You,%20Zhi-Qiang&rft.date=2015-11-28&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=204104&rft.epage=204104&rft.pages=204104-204104&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4936357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1738814842%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123808692&rft_id=info:pmid/26627947&rfr_iscdi=true