Loading…
Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models
The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and verti...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of chemical physics 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3 |
container_end_page | 204104 |
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 204104 |
container_title | The Journal of chemical physics |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | You, Zhi-Qiang Mewes, Jan-Michael Dreuw, Andreas Herbert, John M |
description | The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.4936357 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22493266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1738814842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgwB9AlriARAfvbh-jEZsUBAc4W253teLQbU-8sP16upkhnOpQr56q6kPoKSUXlCj-ml4IwxWX-h7aUdKbTitD7qMdIYx2RhF1hh6VckMIoZqJh-iMKcW0EXqHfuzTcnA5lBRxmnC9BvzRZd8KdnHEn-Gby3jt11BDigWH-BfxKVb4WbeJmGIHty3MYcihLa_wIc2r77cbZug2LsTWFlzS_N1tDrykEebyGD2Y3Fzgyameo69v33zZv--uPr37sL-86jwXtHZmcpIwMlEDkyDKycEMwjNJ5Silc1JrEEb3wKZxnAzxMAFIcMM4cC6J9vwcPT96U6nBFh8q-Ot1rQi-WsbWv62_WKkXR-qQ022DUu0Siod5dhFSK5Zq3vdU9IL9F96hN6nluN5gGWW8J70yG_XySPmcSskw2UMOi8u_LCV2y8xSe8psZZ-djG1YYLwj_4XE_wDAeZIW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2123808692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>AIP Journals (American Institute of Physics)</source><creator>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</creator><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><description>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are <0.2 eV (and often <0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4936357</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26627947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Chemical partition ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; Computational chemistry ; Conductors ; Continuum modeling ; CORRECTIONS ; DIELECTRIC MATERIALS ; Dielectric polarization ; EQUILIBRIUM ; Equivalence ; EV RANGE ; EXCITATION ; Formulations ; FREE ENERGY ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS ; INTERCHANGEABILITY ; Ionization ; Mathematical models ; MOLECULES ; PARTITION ; Partitions ; PERTURBATION THEORY ; Physics ; POLARIZATION ; QUANTUM MECHANICS ; SOLUTES ; SOLUTIONS ; SOLVATION ; SOLVENTS</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104</ispartof><rights>2015 AIP Publishing LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,782,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22493266$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreuw, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are <0.2 eV (and often <0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</description><subject>Chemical partition</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>Computational chemistry</subject><subject>Conductors</subject><subject>Continuum modeling</subject><subject>CORRECTIONS</subject><subject>DIELECTRIC MATERIALS</subject><subject>Dielectric polarization</subject><subject>EQUILIBRIUM</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>EV RANGE</subject><subject>EXCITATION</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>FREE ENERGY</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>INTEGRAL EQUATIONS</subject><subject>INTERCHANGEABILITY</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MOLECULES</subject><subject>PARTITION</subject><subject>Partitions</subject><subject>PERTURBATION THEORY</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>POLARIZATION</subject><subject>QUANTUM MECHANICS</subject><subject>SOLUTES</subject><subject>SOLUTIONS</subject><subject>SOLVATION</subject><subject>SOLVENTS</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkUlvFDEQRi0EIkPgwB9AlriARAfvbh-jEZsUBAc4W253teLQbU-8sP16upkhnOpQr56q6kPoKSUXlCj-ml4IwxWX-h7aUdKbTitD7qMdIYx2RhF1hh6VckMIoZqJh-iMKcW0EXqHfuzTcnA5lBRxmnC9BvzRZd8KdnHEn-Gby3jt11BDigWH-BfxKVb4WbeJmGIHty3MYcihLa_wIc2r77cbZug2LsTWFlzS_N1tDrykEebyGD2Y3Fzgyameo69v33zZv--uPr37sL-86jwXtHZmcpIwMlEDkyDKycEMwjNJ5Silc1JrEEb3wKZxnAzxMAFIcMM4cC6J9vwcPT96U6nBFh8q-Ot1rQi-WsbWv62_WKkXR-qQ022DUu0Siod5dhFSK5Zq3vdU9IL9F96hN6nluN5gGWW8J70yG_XySPmcSskw2UMOi8u_LCV2y8xSe8psZZ-djG1YYLwj_4XE_wDAeZIW</recordid><startdate>20151128</startdate><enddate>20151128</enddate><creator>You, Zhi-Qiang</creator><creator>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creator><creator>Dreuw, Andreas</creator><creator>Herbert, John M</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151128</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</title><author>You, Zhi-Qiang ; Mewes, Jan-Michael ; Dreuw, Andreas ; Herbert, John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chemical partition</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>Computational chemistry</topic><topic>Conductors</topic><topic>Continuum modeling</topic><topic>CORRECTIONS</topic><topic>DIELECTRIC MATERIALS</topic><topic>Dielectric polarization</topic><topic>EQUILIBRIUM</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>EV RANGE</topic><topic>EXCITATION</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>FREE ENERGY</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>INTEGRAL EQUATIONS</topic><topic>INTERCHANGEABILITY</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MOLECULES</topic><topic>PARTITION</topic><topic>Partitions</topic><topic>PERTURBATION THEORY</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>POLARIZATION</topic><topic>QUANTUM MECHANICS</topic><topic>SOLUTES</topic><topic>SOLUTIONS</topic><topic>SOLVATION</topic><topic>SOLVENTS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>You, Zhi-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Jan-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreuw, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, John M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>You, Zhi-Qiang</au><au>Mewes, Jan-Michael</au><au>Dreuw, Andreas</au><au>Herbert, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2015-11-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>204104</spage><epage>204104</epage><pages>204104-204104</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><abstract>The Marcus and Pekar partitions are common, alternative models to describe the non-equilibrium dielectric polarization response that accompanies instantaneous perturbation of a solute embedded in a dielectric continuum. Examples of such a perturbation include vertical electronic excitation and vertical ionization of a solution-phase molecule. Here, we provide a general derivation of the accompanying polarization response, for a quantum-mechanical solute described within the framework of a polarizable continuum model (PCM) of electrostatic solvation. Although the non-equilibrium free energy is formally equivalent within the two partitions, albeit partitioned differently into "fast" versus "slow" polarization contributions, discretization of the PCM integral equations fails to preserve certain symmetries contained in these equations (except in the case of the conductor-like models or when the solute cavity is spherical), leading to alternative, non-equivalent matrix equations. Unlike the total equilibrium solvation energy, however, which can differ dramatically between different formulations, we demonstrate that the equivalence of the Marcus and Pekar partitions for the non-equilibrium solvation correction is preserved to high accuracy. Differences in vertical excitation and ionization energies are <0.2 eV (and often <0.01 eV), even for systems specifically selected to afford a large polarization response. Numerical results therefore support the interchangeability of the Marcus and Pekar partitions, but also caution against relying too much on the fast PCM charges for interpretive value, as these charges differ greatly between the two partitions, especially in polar solvents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>26627947</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4936357</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-2278</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9606 |
ispartof | The Journal of chemical physics, 2015-11, Vol.143 (20), p.204104-204104 |
issn | 0021-9606 1089-7690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22493266 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); AIP Journals (American Institute of Physics) |
subjects | Chemical partition COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS Computational chemistry Conductors Continuum modeling CORRECTIONS DIELECTRIC MATERIALS Dielectric polarization EQUILIBRIUM Equivalence EV RANGE EXCITATION Formulations FREE ENERGY INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY INTEGRAL EQUATIONS INTERCHANGEABILITY Ionization Mathematical models MOLECULES PARTITION Partitions PERTURBATION THEORY Physics POLARIZATION QUANTUM MECHANICS SOLUTES SOLUTIONS SOLVATION SOLVENTS |
title | Comparison of the Marcus and Pekar partitions in the context of non-equilibrium, polarizable-continuum solvation models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Marcus%20and%20Pekar%20partitions%20in%20the%20context%20of%20non-equilibrium,%20polarizable-continuum%20solvation%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=You,%20Zhi-Qiang&rft.date=2015-11-28&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=204104&rft.epage=204104&rft.pages=204104-204104&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4936357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1738814842%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9fa5020f19ef406a5b9b4c2515d55aa577e4978e2fddf90cefee5eabdb33507c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123808692&rft_id=info:pmid/26627947&rfr_iscdi=true |