Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x‐ray image detectors

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-08, Vol.42 (8), p.4423-4427
• Main Authors: Gislason‐Lee, Amber J., Tunstall, Clare M., Kengyelics, Stephen K., Cowen, Arnold R., Davies, Andrew G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; ACCURACY; angiocardiography; Angiography; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSELS; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; Cardiac Imaging Techniques - instrumentation; Cardiac Imaging Techniques - methods; detective quantum efficiency; Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation; diagnostic radiography; digital radiography; fluoroscopy; Heart - diagnostic imaging; HOSPITALS; Image analysis; Image detection systems; IMAGE PROCESSING; Image sensors; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION; Medical image noise; Medical X‐ray imaging; Models, Theoretical; MODULATION; modulation transfer function; Modulation transfer functions; QUANTUM EFFICIENCY; Quantum Theory; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; Radiography - instrumentation; Radiography - methods; SIMULATION; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; Transforming x‐rays; TUNGSTEN; X-Rays; X‐ and γ‐ray instruments; x‐ray; X‐ray apparatus; X‐ray detectors; X‐ray imaging; X‐ray technique
• ISSN: 0094-2405; 2473-4209
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4923178

Purpose: Cardiac x‐ray detectors are used to acquire moving images in real‐time for angiography and interventional procedures. Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is not generally measured on these dynamic detectors; the required “for processing” image data and control of x‐ray settings have not been accessible. By 2016, USA hospital physicists will have the ability to measure DQE and will likely utilize the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for measuring DQE of dynamic x‐ray imaging devices. The current IEC standard requires an image of a tilted tungsten edge test object to obtain modulation transfer function (MTF) for DQE calculation. It specifies the range of edge angles to use; however, it does not specify a preferred method to determine this angle for image analysis. The study aimed to answer the question “will my choice in method impact my results?” Four different established edge angle determination methods were compared to investigate the impact on DQE. Methods: Following the IEC standard, edge and flat field images were acquired on a cardiac flat‐panel detector to calculate MTF and noise power spectrum, respectively, to determine DQE. Accuracy of the methods in determining the correct angle was ascertained using a simulated edge image with known angulations. Precision of the methods was ascertained using variability of MTF and DQE, calculated via bootstrapping. Results: Three methods provided near equal angles and the same MTF while the fourth, with an angular difference of 6%, had a MTF lower by 3% at 1.5 mm−1 spatial frequency and 8% at 2.5 mm−1; corresponding DQE differences were 6% at 1.5 mm−1 and 17% at 2.5 mm−1; differences were greater than standard deviations in the measurements. Conclusions: DQE measurements may vary by a significant amount, depending on the method used to determine the edge angle when following the IEC standard methodology for a cardiac x‐ray detector. The most accurate and precise methods are recommended for absolute assessments and reproducible measurements, respectively.