Loading…
The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas
Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who und...
Saved in:
Published in: | Abdominal imaging 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3 |
container_end_page | 2315 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2308 |
container_title | Abdominal imaging |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Shakeri, Sepideh Afshari Mirak, Sohrab Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein Pantuck, Allan Sisk, Anthony Ahuja, Preeti Lu, David S. Raman, Steven S. |
description | Purpose
To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).
Materials and methods
In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate.
Results
Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm (
P
= 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months.
Conclusions
Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22922992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188816679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eaqu2f6AHZIkLl4A_1o5zRCuglSpx6FbiZjmTSesqiRfbAS1_gT-Nd1O2NyR_yfPMa8-8hFxx9oEzVn9MjAnNK8ab_dR1ZV6RMyG1rhhT5vXxvPp-Si5TemKMca04F-qEnEpmVrXS6oz82Twixb5HyDT0NM9jiDT530jd1NEhgMs-TLSMAnlwsDsEkusx7_YZ93fV4Wa9qejD7Dvs6BYjzNlNGOZERw8x_HI_i2A7LGJ-ohEnN1DAoSwugp_C6NIFedO7IeHl835O7r983qyvq9tvX2_Wn24rWDGZK1AKBe8A-8Y0omt4LWte961sjeo6xlGi5krp2iHXjdYrUFr2rVOKgQQAeU7eLbohZW8T-IzwCGGaShOsEE0ZjSjU-4XaxvBjxpTt6NP-x0thVnDTKKm05i-CR_QpzLFUeKCM4VrXTaHEQpWGpBSxt9voRxd3ljO799Quntripz14ak1JevssPbcjdseUfw4WQC5AKqHpAePL2_-R_Qv-M6ua</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188816679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).
Materials and methods
In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate.
Results
Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm (
P
= 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months.
Conclusions
Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30847565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>ABLATION ; BIOPSY ; Bladder ; Cancer ; CARCINOMAS ; Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma ; Complications ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Demography ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; Gastroenterology ; Hematoma ; HEMATOMAS ; Hepatology ; Imaging ; Kidney cancer ; KIDNEYS ; Lesions ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Microwave ablation ; MICROWAVE RADIATION ; PAIN ; PATIENTS ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Renal function ; Retroperitoneum ; Safety ; Success ; Survival ; Tumors ; Ureters</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Abdominal Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847565$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22922992$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantuck, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahuja, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).
Materials and methods
In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate.
Results
Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm (
P
= 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months.
Conclusions
Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</description><subject>ABLATION</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>HEMATOMAS</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>KIDNEYS</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Microwave ablation</subject><subject>MICROWAVE RADIATION</subject><subject>PAIN</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>Retroperitoneum</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ureters</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eaqu2f6AHZIkLl4A_1o5zRCuglSpx6FbiZjmTSesqiRfbAS1_gT-Nd1O2NyR_yfPMa8-8hFxx9oEzVn9MjAnNK8ab_dR1ZV6RMyG1rhhT5vXxvPp-Si5TemKMca04F-qEnEpmVrXS6oz82Twixb5HyDT0NM9jiDT530jd1NEhgMs-TLSMAnlwsDsEkusx7_YZ93fV4Wa9qejD7Dvs6BYjzNlNGOZERw8x_HI_i2A7LGJ-ohEnN1DAoSwugp_C6NIFedO7IeHl835O7r983qyvq9tvX2_Wn24rWDGZK1AKBe8A-8Y0omt4LWte961sjeo6xlGi5krp2iHXjdYrUFr2rVOKgQQAeU7eLbohZW8T-IzwCGGaShOsEE0ZjSjU-4XaxvBjxpTt6NP-x0thVnDTKKm05i-CR_QpzLFUeKCM4VrXTaHEQpWGpBSxt9voRxd3ljO799Quntripz14ak1JevssPbcjdseUfw4WQC5AKqHpAePL2_-R_Qv-M6ua</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Shakeri, Sepideh</creator><creator>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creator><creator>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creator><creator>Pantuck, Allan</creator><creator>Sisk, Anthony</creator><creator>Ahuja, Preeti</creator><creator>Lu, David S.</creator><creator>Raman, Steven S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><author>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ABLATION</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>HEMATOMAS</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>KIDNEYS</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Microwave ablation</topic><topic>MICROWAVE RADIATION</topic><topic>PAIN</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>Retroperitoneum</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ureters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantuck, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahuja, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shakeri, Sepideh</au><au>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</au><au>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</au><au>Pantuck, Allan</au><au>Sisk, Anthony</au><au>Ahuja, Preeti</au><au>Lu, David S.</au><au>Raman, Steven S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2308</spage><epage>2315</epage><pages>2308-2315</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).
Materials and methods
In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate.
Results
Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm (
P
= 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months.
Conclusions
Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30847565</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2366-004X |
ispartof | Abdominal imaging, 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315 |
issn | 2366-004X 2366-0058 2366-0058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22922992 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | ABLATION BIOPSY Bladder Cancer CARCINOMAS Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma Complications COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY Data collection Demographics Demography Epidermal growth factor receptors Gastroenterology Hematoma HEMATOMAS Hepatology Imaging Kidney cancer KIDNEYS Lesions Medicine Medicine & Public Health Microwave ablation MICROWAVE RADIATION PAIN PATIENTS Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Renal function Retroperitoneum Safety Success Survival Tumors Ureters |
title | The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20tumor%20size%20and%20location%20on%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20US-%20and%20CT-%20guided%20percutaneous%20microwave%20ablation%20in%20renal%20cell%20carcinomas&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Shakeri,%20Sepideh&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2308&rft.epage=2315&rft.pages=2308-2315&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2188816679%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188816679&rft_id=info:pmid/30847565&rfr_iscdi=true |