Loading…

The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas

Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Abdominal imaging 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315
Main Authors: Shakeri, Sepideh, Afshari Mirak, Sohrab, Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein, Pantuck, Allan, Sisk, Anthony, Ahuja, Preeti, Lu, David S., Raman, Steven S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3
container_end_page 2315
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2308
container_title Abdominal imaging
container_volume 44
creator Shakeri, Sepideh
Afshari Mirak, Sohrab
Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein
Pantuck, Allan
Sisk, Anthony
Ahuja, Preeti
Lu, David S.
Raman, Steven S.
description Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate. Results Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm ( P  = 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months. Conclusions Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22922992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188816679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eaqu2f6AHZIkLl4A_1o5zRCuglSpx6FbiZjmTSesqiRfbAS1_gT-Nd1O2NyR_yfPMa8-8hFxx9oEzVn9MjAnNK8ab_dR1ZV6RMyG1rhhT5vXxvPp-Si5TemKMca04F-qEnEpmVrXS6oz82Twixb5HyDT0NM9jiDT530jd1NEhgMs-TLSMAnlwsDsEkusx7_YZ93fV4Wa9qejD7Dvs6BYjzNlNGOZERw8x_HI_i2A7LGJ-ohEnN1DAoSwugp_C6NIFedO7IeHl835O7r983qyvq9tvX2_Wn24rWDGZK1AKBe8A-8Y0omt4LWte961sjeo6xlGi5krp2iHXjdYrUFr2rVOKgQQAeU7eLbohZW8T-IzwCGGaShOsEE0ZjSjU-4XaxvBjxpTt6NP-x0thVnDTKKm05i-CR_QpzLFUeKCM4VrXTaHEQpWGpBSxt9voRxd3ljO799Quntripz14ak1JevssPbcjdseUfw4WQC5AKqHpAePL2_-R_Qv-M6ua</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188816679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate. Results Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm ( P  = 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months. Conclusions Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30847565</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>ABLATION ; BIOPSY ; Bladder ; Cancer ; CARCINOMAS ; Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma ; Complications ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Demography ; Epidermal growth factor receptors ; Gastroenterology ; Hematoma ; HEMATOMAS ; Hepatology ; Imaging ; Kidney cancer ; KIDNEYS ; Lesions ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microwave ablation ; MICROWAVE RADIATION ; PAIN ; PATIENTS ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Renal function ; Retroperitoneum ; Safety ; Success ; Survival ; Tumors ; Ureters</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Abdominal Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847565$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22922992$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantuck, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahuja, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate. Results Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm ( P  = 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months. Conclusions Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</description><subject>ABLATION</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>HEMATOMAS</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>KIDNEYS</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microwave ablation</subject><subject>MICROWAVE RADIATION</subject><subject>PAIN</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>Retroperitoneum</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ureters</subject><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0Eaqu2f6AHZIkLl4A_1o5zRCuglSpx6FbiZjmTSesqiRfbAS1_gT-Nd1O2NyR_yfPMa8-8hFxx9oEzVn9MjAnNK8ab_dR1ZV6RMyG1rhhT5vXxvPp-Si5TemKMca04F-qEnEpmVrXS6oz82Twixb5HyDT0NM9jiDT530jd1NEhgMs-TLSMAnlwsDsEkusx7_YZ93fV4Wa9qejD7Dvs6BYjzNlNGOZERw8x_HI_i2A7LGJ-ohEnN1DAoSwugp_C6NIFedO7IeHl835O7r983qyvq9tvX2_Wn24rWDGZK1AKBe8A-8Y0omt4LWte961sjeo6xlGi5krp2iHXjdYrUFr2rVOKgQQAeU7eLbohZW8T-IzwCGGaShOsEE0ZjSjU-4XaxvBjxpTt6NP-x0thVnDTKKm05i-CR_QpzLFUeKCM4VrXTaHEQpWGpBSxt9voRxd3ljO799Quntripz14ak1JevssPbcjdseUfw4WQC5AKqHpAePL2_-R_Qv-M6ua</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Shakeri, Sepideh</creator><creator>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creator><creator>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creator><creator>Pantuck, Allan</creator><creator>Sisk, Anthony</creator><creator>Ahuja, Preeti</creator><creator>Lu, David S.</creator><creator>Raman, Steven S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</title><author>Shakeri, Sepideh ; Afshari Mirak, Sohrab ; Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein ; Pantuck, Allan ; Sisk, Anthony ; Ahuja, Preeti ; Lu, David S. ; Raman, Steven S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ABLATION</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>HEMATOMAS</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>KIDNEYS</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microwave ablation</topic><topic>MICROWAVE RADIATION</topic><topic>PAIN</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>Retroperitoneum</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ureters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantuck, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sisk, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahuja, Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shakeri, Sepideh</au><au>Afshari Mirak, Sohrab</au><au>Mohammadian Bajgiran, Amirhossein</au><au>Pantuck, Allan</au><au>Sisk, Anthony</au><au>Ahuja, Preeti</au><au>Lu, David S.</au><au>Raman, Steven S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2308</spage><epage>2315</epage><pages>2308-2315</pages><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Materials and methods In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used for survival rate. Results Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4–11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8–7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm ( P  = 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months. Conclusions Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30847565</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-004X
ispartof Abdominal imaging, 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2308-2315
issn 2366-004X
2366-0058
2366-0058
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22922992
source Springer Link
subjects ABLATION
BIOPSY
Bladder
Cancer
CARCINOMAS
Clear cell-type renal cell carcinoma
Complications
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Data collection
Demographics
Demography
Epidermal growth factor receptors
Gastroenterology
Hematoma
HEMATOMAS
Hepatology
Imaging
Kidney cancer
KIDNEYS
Lesions
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microwave ablation
MICROWAVE RADIATION
PAIN
PATIENTS
Radiology
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Renal function
Retroperitoneum
Safety
Success
Survival
Tumors
Ureters
title The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20tumor%20size%20and%20location%20on%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20US-%20and%20CT-%20guided%20percutaneous%20microwave%20ablation%20in%20renal%20cell%20carcinomas&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Shakeri,%20Sepideh&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2308&rft.epage=2315&rft.pages=2308-2315&rft.issn=2366-004X&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-019-01967-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2188816679%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c55e21dcef9892d9173717fb3b85dd01e3e615567ae169664c563fba550c3ccc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188816679&rft_id=info:pmid/30847565&rfr_iscdi=true