Loading…
Hazard of Tritium as a Deoxyribonucleic Acid Label in Man
IN the Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 1,2 (1955, 1960) on maximum permissible body burden, tritium is considered only in water which is widely and uniformly distributed throughout the body. It is pointed out in the Recommendations that great care must be t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 1960-04, Vol.186 (4718), p.91-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | IN the Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
1,2
(1955, 1960) on maximum permissible body burden, tritium is considered only in water which is widely and uniformly distributed throughout the body. It is pointed out in the Recommendations that great care must be taken in applying these data to other chemical forms which may give a different localization. However, this fact is still not always appreciated and although it is particularly serious for tritium. The average range of its beta-particles is only about 1µ (maximum range about 7µ) and the local dose-rate will have reached about half the maximum for a deposit of isotope in a volume of the order of only 10µ
3
. Further, an increased relative biological effectiveness is to be expected for these low-energy beta-particles compared with gamma radiation, and from observations of radiation effects on cell growth, Pinson and Langham
3
have suggested that a value of 1.7 should be used. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/186091a0 |