Loading…
Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria
The Bulgarian greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile reveals the energy sector as the most significant emission source and also as an area where great potential for GHG emissions reduction exists. Mitigation options in energy supply were selected considering the potential of fossil fuel substitution...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied energy 1997-03, Vol.56 (3), p.299-308 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-2cc269549b38f4e8e9371adc6a573c238f754afecc5caadd6439504bf37ab9473 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 308 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Applied energy |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Christov, Christo Simeonova, Katja Todorova, Sevdalina Krastev, Vladimir |
description | The Bulgarian greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile reveals the energy sector as the most significant emission source and also as an area where great potential for GHG emissions reduction exists. Mitigation options in energy supply were selected considering the potential of fossil fuel substitution and new energy technology implementation in the context of the existing structure of energy system and projects for mid- and long-term development. Basically three modules of ENPEP were used: BALANCE — to calculate the energy flows and energy cost from primary fuel resources and fuel import to energy end-use, IMPACT — to calculate GHG emissions, and ELECTRIC — to project the electric system long-term development. Different mitigation measures combined in four scenarios were developed. The integrated mitigation scenario incorporated a mix of mitigation measures in the energy demand and supply. Implementation of CO
2 mitigation measures both in energy demand and energy supply would reduce the 2020 emission level by 34.3 Tg (29.1%), and by 544.2 Tg (21.7%) for the entire study period 2000 – 2020, compared to the baseline scenario. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0306-2619(97)00012-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_484385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261997000123</els_id><sourcerecordid>14462659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-2cc269549b38f4e8e9371adc6a573c238f754afecc5caadd6439504bf37ab9473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpoNu0P6GgQinpwY0-betUktAvWMgh7Vlo5fGuim25Gm1g_33lOOy1h3cGxPOOZl5C3nH2mTNeXz8wyepK1NxcmeYTY4yLSr4gG942ojKcty_J5oy8Iq8R_xRIcME25PYGERBHmDKNPR1DDnuXQ5xonJeGtI-J5gNQmCDtTxRPmGGkYaK3x2HvUnBvyEXvBoS3z_2S_P729dfdj2p7__3n3c228pqZXAnvRW20MjvZ9gpaMLLhrvO10430ojw2WrkevNfeua6rlTSaqV0vG7czqpGX5P06N2IOFn3I4A8-ThP4bFWrZKsL83Fl5hT_HgGzHQN6GAY3QTyi5UrVotamgHoFfYqICXo7pzC6dLKc2SVV-5SqXSKzprFPqVpZfNvVl2AGfzYBgJvnEpF9tNLpupRTETfFKl0oklaVOhcJY6xkrT3ksYz78LyvQ--GPrnJBzyPFa0w5eOCfVkxKPk-BkjL-TB56EJaru9i-M_e_wC0KKTm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14462659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Christov, Christo ; Simeonova, Katja ; Todorova, Sevdalina ; Krastev, Vladimir</creator><creatorcontrib>Christov, Christo ; Simeonova, Katja ; Todorova, Sevdalina ; Krastev, Vladimir ; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The Bulgarian greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile reveals the energy sector as the most significant emission source and also as an area where great potential for GHG emissions reduction exists. Mitigation options in energy supply were selected considering the potential of fossil fuel substitution and new energy technology implementation in the context of the existing structure of energy system and projects for mid- and long-term development. Basically three modules of ENPEP were used: BALANCE — to calculate the energy flows and energy cost from primary fuel resources and fuel import to energy end-use, IMPACT — to calculate GHG emissions, and ELECTRIC — to project the electric system long-term development. Different mitigation measures combined in four scenarios were developed. The integrated mitigation scenario incorporated a mix of mitigation measures in the energy demand and supply. Implementation of CO
2 mitigation measures both in energy demand and energy supply would reduce the 2020 emission level by 34.3 Tg (29.1%), and by 544.2 Tg (21.7%) for the entire study period 2000 – 2020, compared to the baseline scenario.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0306-2619(97)00012-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APENDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; BULGARIA ; CLIMATIC CHANGE ; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ; Energy ; ENERGY DEMAND ; Energy economics ; ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY ; Energy policy ; ENERGY SUPPLIES ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; GREENHOUSE GASES ; MITIGATION ; PLANNING</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 1997-03, Vol.56 (3), p.299-308</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-2cc269549b38f4e8e9371adc6a573c238f754afecc5caadd6439504bf37ab9473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2829001$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeappene/v_3a56_3ay_3a1997_3ai_3a3-4_3ap_3a299-308.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/484385$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christov, Christo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeonova, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todorova, Sevdalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krastev, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>The Bulgarian greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile reveals the energy sector as the most significant emission source and also as an area where great potential for GHG emissions reduction exists. Mitigation options in energy supply were selected considering the potential of fossil fuel substitution and new energy technology implementation in the context of the existing structure of energy system and projects for mid- and long-term development. Basically three modules of ENPEP were used: BALANCE — to calculate the energy flows and energy cost from primary fuel resources and fuel import to energy end-use, IMPACT — to calculate GHG emissions, and ELECTRIC — to project the electric system long-term development. Different mitigation measures combined in four scenarios were developed. The integrated mitigation scenario incorporated a mix of mitigation measures in the energy demand and supply. Implementation of CO
2 mitigation measures both in energy demand and energy supply would reduce the 2020 emission level by 34.3 Tg (29.1%), and by 544.2 Tg (21.7%) for the entire study period 2000 – 2020, compared to the baseline scenario.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>BULGARIA</subject><subject>CLIMATIC CHANGE</subject><subject>ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>ENERGY DEMAND</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>ENERGY SUPPLIES</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>GREENHOUSE GASES</subject><subject>MITIGATION</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpoNu0P6GgQinpwY0-betUktAvWMgh7Vlo5fGuim25Gm1g_33lOOy1h3cGxPOOZl5C3nH2mTNeXz8wyepK1NxcmeYTY4yLSr4gG942ojKcty_J5oy8Iq8R_xRIcME25PYGERBHmDKNPR1DDnuXQ5xonJeGtI-J5gNQmCDtTxRPmGGkYaK3x2HvUnBvyEXvBoS3z_2S_P729dfdj2p7__3n3c228pqZXAnvRW20MjvZ9gpaMLLhrvO10430ojw2WrkevNfeua6rlTSaqV0vG7czqpGX5P06N2IOFn3I4A8-ThP4bFWrZKsL83Fl5hT_HgGzHQN6GAY3QTyi5UrVotamgHoFfYqICXo7pzC6dLKc2SVV-5SqXSKzprFPqVpZfNvVl2AGfzYBgJvnEpF9tNLpupRTETfFKl0oklaVOhcJY6xkrT3ksYz78LyvQ--GPrnJBzyPFa0w5eOCfVkxKPk-BkjL-TB56EJaru9i-M_e_wC0KKTm</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>Christov, Christo</creator><creator>Simeonova, Katja</creator><creator>Todorova, Sevdalina</creator><creator>Krastev, Vladimir</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria</title><author>Christov, Christo ; Simeonova, Katja ; Todorova, Sevdalina ; Krastev, Vladimir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-2cc269549b38f4e8e9371adc6a573c238f754afecc5caadd6439504bf37ab9473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>BULGARIA</topic><topic>CLIMATIC CHANGE</topic><topic>ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>ENERGY DEMAND</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>ENERGY SUPPLIES</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>GREENHOUSE GASES</topic><topic>MITIGATION</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christov, Christo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeonova, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todorova, Sevdalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krastev, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christov, Christo</au><au>Simeonova, Katja</au><au>Todorova, Sevdalina</au><au>Krastev, Vladimir</au><aucorp>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>299-308</pages><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><coden>APENDX</coden><abstract>The Bulgarian greenhouse gas (GHG) emission profile reveals the energy sector as the most significant emission source and also as an area where great potential for GHG emissions reduction exists. Mitigation options in energy supply were selected considering the potential of fossil fuel substitution and new energy technology implementation in the context of the existing structure of energy system and projects for mid- and long-term development. Basically three modules of ENPEP were used: BALANCE — to calculate the energy flows and energy cost from primary fuel resources and fuel import to energy end-use, IMPACT — to calculate GHG emissions, and ELECTRIC — to project the electric system long-term development. Different mitigation measures combined in four scenarios were developed. The integrated mitigation scenario incorporated a mix of mitigation measures in the energy demand and supply. Implementation of CO
2 mitigation measures both in energy demand and energy supply would reduce the 2020 emission level by 34.3 Tg (29.1%), and by 544.2 Tg (21.7%) for the entire study period 2000 – 2020, compared to the baseline scenario.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0306-2619(97)00012-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-2619 |
ispartof | Applied energy, 1997-03, Vol.56 (3), p.299-308 |
issn | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_484385 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences BULGARIA CLIMATIC CHANGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Energy ENERGY DEMAND Energy economics ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY Energy policy ENERGY SUPPLIES ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies GREENHOUSE GASES MITIGATION PLANNING |
title | Assessment of mitigation options for the energy system in Bulgaria |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A42%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20mitigation%20options%20for%20the%20energy%20system%20in%20Bulgaria&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Christov,%20Christo&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Berkeley%20National%20Lab.,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=299-308&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft.coden=APENDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0306-2619(97)00012-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E14462659%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-2cc269549b38f4e8e9371adc6a573c238f754afecc5caadd6439504bf37ab9473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14462659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |