Ontogenetic Loss of Phenotypic Plasticity of Age at Metamorphosis in Tadpoles

Amphibian larvae exhibit phenotypic plasticity in size at metamorphosis and duration of the larval period. I used Pseudacris crucifer tadpoles to test two models for predicting tadpole age and size at metamorphosis under changing environmental conditions. The Wilbur—Collins model states that metamor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 1993-12, Vol.74 (8), p.2405-2412
Main Author: Hensley, Frank R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
550800 - Morphology
AMPHIBIANS
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
ANIMALS
AQUATIC ORGANISMS
Autoecology
BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Biological and medical sciences
Developmental stages
Ecology
Food availability
Food supply
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Insect larvae
LARVAE
Larval development
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
METAMORPHOSIS
Modeling
Pseudacris crucifer
Reptiles & amphibians
Reptilia. Amphibia
Tadpoles
Vertebrata
VERTEBRATES
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Amphibian larvae exhibit phenotypic plasticity in size at metamorphosis and duration of the larval period. I used Pseudacris crucifer tadpoles to test two models for predicting tadpole age and size at metamorphosis under changing environmental conditions. The Wilbur—Collins model states that metamorphosis is initiated as a function of a tadpole's size and relative growth rate, and predicts that changes in growth rate throughout the larval period affect age and size at metamorphosis. An alternative model, the fixed—rate model, states that age at metamorphosis is fixed early in larval life, and subsequent changes in growth rate will have no effect on the length of the larval period. My results confirm that food supplies affect both age and size at metamorphosis, but developmental rates became fixed at approximately Gosner (1960) stages 35—37. Neither model completely predicted these results. I suggest that the generally accepted Wilbur—Collins model is improved by incorporating a point of fixed developmental timing. Growth trajectories predicted from this modified model fit the results of this study better than trajectories based on either of the original models. The results of this study suggest a constraint that limits the simultaneous optimization of age and size at metamorphosis.
ISSN:0012-9658
1939-9170
DOI:10.2307/1939591