Measurement and Calculation of Fluid Dynamic Characteristics of Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flows

• Published in: Journal of fluids engineering 1993-09, Vol.115 (3), p.383-388
• Main Authors: Hosni, M. H, Coleman, H. W, Taylor, R. P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 420400 - Engineering- Heat Transfer & Fluid Flow; Boundary layer and shear turbulence; BOUNDARY LAYERS; CALCULATION METHODS; DATA; DYNAMICS; ENGINEERING; Exact sciences and technology; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; Fluid dynamics; FLUID FLOW; FRICTION FACTOR; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); INFORMATION; LAYERS; MECHANICS; NUMERICAL DATA; Physics; TURBULENT FLOW; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer; VELOCITY
• ISSN: 0098-2202; 1528-901X
• DOI: 10.1115/1.2910150

Experimental measurements of profiles of mean velocity and distributions of boundary-layer thickness and skin friction coefficient from aerodynamically smooth, transitionally rough, and fully rough turbulent boundary-layer flows are presented for four surfaces—three rough and one smooth. The rough surfaces are composed of 1.27 mm diameter hemispheres spaced in staggered arrays 2, 4, and 10 base diameters apart, respectively, on otherwise smooth walls. The current incompressible turbulent boundary-layer rough-wall air flow data are compared with previously published results on another, similar rough surface. It is shown that fully rough mean velocity profiles collapse together when scaled as a function of momentum thickness, as was reported previously. However, this similarity cannot be used to distinguish roughness flow regimes, since a similar degree of collapse is observed in the transitionally rough data. Observation of the new data shows that scaling on the momentum thickness alone is not sufficient to produce similar velocity profiles for flows over surfaces of different roughness character. The skin friction coefficient data versus the ratio of the momentum thickness to roughness height collapse within the data uncertainty, irrespective of roughness flow regime, with the data for each rough surface collapsing to a different curve. Calculations made using the previously published discrete element prediction method are compared with data from the rough surfaces with well-defined roughness elements, and it is shown that the calculations are in good agreement with the data.