Loading…
Report of panel 3: Concept improvement
The charge to Panel 3 was to look at the idea of concept improvements in the context of US DOE management of the magnetic fusion program. The panel suggested that if DOE were commited to the idea of concept improvement, it needed to overcome the existing impression it was not receptive to new ideas....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of fusion energy 1992-12, Vol.11 (3-4), p.163-169 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f049078584c6c0e1d32fb3fc3fd0290a8a6d815a5e96dd1b095607459eaeb1b63 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 169 |
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Journal of fusion energy |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Dean, Stephen O. Ripin, Barrett H. Batchelor, Don Berkner, Klaus Ellis, William R. Gentle, Kenneth W. Kaye, Stanley M. Logan, B. Grant Marmar, Earl Navratil, Gerald Ness, Norman F. Ohkawa, Tihiro Siemon, Richard E. Steiner, Don Weitzner, Harold |
description | The charge to Panel 3 was to look at the idea of concept improvements in the context of US DOE management of the magnetic fusion program. The panel suggested that if DOE were commited to the idea of concept improvement, it needed to overcome the existing impression it was not receptive to new ideas. In part the long time scale for development of fusion energy, coupled with the rate of change of scientific programs and research based on emerging knowledge, means that in general the program will be much different ten to twenty years in the future. To be able to meet this changing direction, the US program must maintain an openness to look at promising alternative ideas, spend money on developing the ideas, and consider funding some to intermediate development levels. Stellerator research was offered as one alternative to consider in light of present international work. The panel urged supporting the development of new concepts and ideas, as well as continued support for plasma physics basic research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01059520 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_6448417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_BF01059520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f049078584c6c0e1d32fb3fc3fd0290a8a6d815a5e96dd1b095607459eaeb1b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAUAIMoWFcv_oLiwYNQfa_5aOJNi6vCgiB6Dmn6gpVtU5og-O91WcHTXIY5DGPnCNcI0NzcrwFBGlnDAStQNnVlpMFDVgAqUQFHfsxOUvoEAKOFKdjlK81xyWUM5ewm2pb8tmzj5GnO5TDOS_yikaZ8yo6C2yY6--OKva8f3tqnavPy-NzebSpfS52rAMJAo6UWXnkg7HkdOh48Dz3UBpx2qtconSSj-h47MFJBI6QhRx12iq_Yxb4bUx5s8kMm_-HjNJHPVgmhBTa_0tVe8ktMaaFg52UY3fJtEexug_3fwH8ABeJM4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Report of panel 3: Concept improvement</title><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>Dean, Stephen O. ; Ripin, Barrett H. ; Batchelor, Don ; Berkner, Klaus ; Ellis, William R. ; Gentle, Kenneth W. ; Kaye, Stanley M. ; Logan, B. Grant ; Marmar, Earl ; Navratil, Gerald ; Ness, Norman F. ; Ohkawa, Tihiro ; Siemon, Richard E. ; Steiner, Don ; Weitzner, Harold</creator><creatorcontrib>Dean, Stephen O. ; Ripin, Barrett H. ; Batchelor, Don ; Berkner, Klaus ; Ellis, William R. ; Gentle, Kenneth W. ; Kaye, Stanley M. ; Logan, B. Grant ; Marmar, Earl ; Navratil, Gerald ; Ness, Norman F. ; Ohkawa, Tihiro ; Siemon, Richard E. ; Steiner, Don ; Weitzner, Harold</creatorcontrib><description>The charge to Panel 3 was to look at the idea of concept improvements in the context of US DOE management of the magnetic fusion program. The panel suggested that if DOE were commited to the idea of concept improvement, it needed to overcome the existing impression it was not receptive to new ideas. In part the long time scale for development of fusion energy, coupled with the rate of change of scientific programs and research based on emerging knowledge, means that in general the program will be much different ten to twenty years in the future. To be able to meet this changing direction, the US program must maintain an openness to look at promising alternative ideas, spend money on developing the ideas, and consider funding some to intermediate development levels. Stellerator research was offered as one alternative to consider in light of present international work. The panel urged supporting the development of new concepts and ideas, as well as continued support for plasma physics basic research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01059520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>290500 - Energy Planning & Policy- Research, Development, Demonstration, & Commercialization ; 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY ; 700412 - Magnetic Confinement Devices- (1992-) ; 700490 - Fusion Technology- Economics- (1992-) ; ADVISORY COMMITTEES ; CLOSED CONFIGURATIONS ; CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES ; CONFINEMENT ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT ; MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS ; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ; PLASMA CONFINEMENT ; RECOMMENDATIONS ; RESEARCH PROGRAMS ; STELLARATORS ; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES ; US DOE ; US ORGANIZATIONS</subject><ispartof>Journal of fusion energy, 1992-12, Vol.11 (3-4), p.163-169</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f049078584c6c0e1d32fb3fc3fd0290a8a6d815a5e96dd1b095607459eaeb1b63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/6448417$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dean, Stephen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripin, Barrett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batchelor, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkner, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentle, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, B. Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmar, Earl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navratil, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ness, Norman F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Tihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzner, Harold</creatorcontrib><title>Report of panel 3: Concept improvement</title><title>Journal of fusion energy</title><description>The charge to Panel 3 was to look at the idea of concept improvements in the context of US DOE management of the magnetic fusion program. The panel suggested that if DOE were commited to the idea of concept improvement, it needed to overcome the existing impression it was not receptive to new ideas. In part the long time scale for development of fusion energy, coupled with the rate of change of scientific programs and research based on emerging knowledge, means that in general the program will be much different ten to twenty years in the future. To be able to meet this changing direction, the US program must maintain an openness to look at promising alternative ideas, spend money on developing the ideas, and consider funding some to intermediate development levels. Stellerator research was offered as one alternative to consider in light of present international work. The panel urged supporting the development of new concepts and ideas, as well as continued support for plasma physics basic research.</description><subject>290500 - Energy Planning & Policy- Research, Development, Demonstration, & Commercialization</subject><subject>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>700412 - Magnetic Confinement Devices- (1992-)</subject><subject>700490 - Fusion Technology- Economics- (1992-)</subject><subject>ADVISORY COMMITTEES</subject><subject>CLOSED CONFIGURATIONS</subject><subject>CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES</subject><subject>CONFINEMENT</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT</subject><subject>MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS</subject><subject>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>PLASMA CONFINEMENT</subject><subject>RECOMMENDATIONS</subject><subject>RESEARCH PROGRAMS</subject><subject>STELLARATORS</subject><subject>THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES</subject><subject>US DOE</subject><subject>US ORGANIZATIONS</subject><issn>0164-0313</issn><issn>1572-9591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAUAIMoWFcv_oLiwYNQfa_5aOJNi6vCgiB6Dmn6gpVtU5og-O91WcHTXIY5DGPnCNcI0NzcrwFBGlnDAStQNnVlpMFDVgAqUQFHfsxOUvoEAKOFKdjlK81xyWUM5ewm2pb8tmzj5GnO5TDOS_yikaZ8yo6C2yY6--OKva8f3tqnavPy-NzebSpfS52rAMJAo6UWXnkg7HkdOh48Dz3UBpx2qtconSSj-h47MFJBI6QhRx12iq_Yxb4bUx5s8kMm_-HjNJHPVgmhBTa_0tVe8ktMaaFg52UY3fJtEexug_3fwH8ABeJM4w</recordid><startdate>199212</startdate><enddate>199212</enddate><creator>Dean, Stephen O.</creator><creator>Ripin, Barrett H.</creator><creator>Batchelor, Don</creator><creator>Berkner, Klaus</creator><creator>Ellis, William R.</creator><creator>Gentle, Kenneth W.</creator><creator>Kaye, Stanley M.</creator><creator>Logan, B. Grant</creator><creator>Marmar, Earl</creator><creator>Navratil, Gerald</creator><creator>Ness, Norman F.</creator><creator>Ohkawa, Tihiro</creator><creator>Siemon, Richard E.</creator><creator>Steiner, Don</creator><creator>Weitzner, Harold</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199212</creationdate><title>Report of panel 3: Concept improvement</title><author>Dean, Stephen O. ; Ripin, Barrett H. ; Batchelor, Don ; Berkner, Klaus ; Ellis, William R. ; Gentle, Kenneth W. ; Kaye, Stanley M. ; Logan, B. Grant ; Marmar, Earl ; Navratil, Gerald ; Ness, Norman F. ; Ohkawa, Tihiro ; Siemon, Richard E. ; Steiner, Don ; Weitzner, Harold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f049078584c6c0e1d32fb3fc3fd0290a8a6d815a5e96dd1b095607459eaeb1b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>290500 - Energy Planning & Policy- Research, Development, Demonstration, & Commercialization</topic><topic>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>700412 - Magnetic Confinement Devices- (1992-)</topic><topic>700490 - Fusion Technology- Economics- (1992-)</topic><topic>ADVISORY COMMITTEES</topic><topic>CLOSED CONFIGURATIONS</topic><topic>CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES</topic><topic>CONFINEMENT</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT</topic><topic>MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS</topic><topic>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>PLASMA CONFINEMENT</topic><topic>RECOMMENDATIONS</topic><topic>RESEARCH PROGRAMS</topic><topic>STELLARATORS</topic><topic>THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES</topic><topic>US DOE</topic><topic>US ORGANIZATIONS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dean, Stephen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripin, Barrett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batchelor, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkner, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentle, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, B. Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmar, Earl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navratil, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ness, Norman F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Tihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzner, Harold</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of fusion energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dean, Stephen O.</au><au>Ripin, Barrett H.</au><au>Batchelor, Don</au><au>Berkner, Klaus</au><au>Ellis, William R.</au><au>Gentle, Kenneth W.</au><au>Kaye, Stanley M.</au><au>Logan, B. Grant</au><au>Marmar, Earl</au><au>Navratil, Gerald</au><au>Ness, Norman F.</au><au>Ohkawa, Tihiro</au><au>Siemon, Richard E.</au><au>Steiner, Don</au><au>Weitzner, Harold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Report of panel 3: Concept improvement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fusion energy</jtitle><date>1992-12</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>163-169</pages><issn>0164-0313</issn><eissn>1572-9591</eissn><abstract>The charge to Panel 3 was to look at the idea of concept improvements in the context of US DOE management of the magnetic fusion program. The panel suggested that if DOE were commited to the idea of concept improvement, it needed to overcome the existing impression it was not receptive to new ideas. In part the long time scale for development of fusion energy, coupled with the rate of change of scientific programs and research based on emerging knowledge, means that in general the program will be much different ten to twenty years in the future. To be able to meet this changing direction, the US program must maintain an openness to look at promising alternative ideas, spend money on developing the ideas, and consider funding some to intermediate development levels. Stellerator research was offered as one alternative to consider in light of present international work. The panel urged supporting the development of new concepts and ideas, as well as continued support for plasma physics basic research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1007/BF01059520</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0164-0313 |
ispartof | Journal of fusion energy, 1992-12, Vol.11 (3-4), p.163-169 |
issn | 0164-0313 1572-9591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_6448417 |
source | Springer LINK Archives |
subjects | 290500 - Energy Planning & Policy- Research, Development, Demonstration, & Commercialization 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY 700412 - Magnetic Confinement Devices- (1992-) 700490 - Fusion Technology- Economics- (1992-) ADVISORY COMMITTEES CLOSED CONFIGURATIONS CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES CONFINEMENT ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS PLASMA CONFINEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS RESEARCH PROGRAMS STELLARATORS THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES US DOE US ORGANIZATIONS |
title | Report of panel 3: Concept improvement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A17%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Report%20of%20panel%203:%20Concept%20improvement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fusion%20energy&rft.au=Dean,%20Stephen%20O.&rft.date=1992-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=163-169&rft.issn=0164-0313&rft.eissn=1572-9591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01059520&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1007_BF01059520%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f049078584c6c0e1d32fb3fc3fd0290a8a6d815a5e96dd1b095607459eaeb1b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |