Loading…

Synthetic adsorbent versus GAC for TCE removal

The performance of a synthetic adsorbent in removing trichloroethene (TCE) from a groundwater containing natural organic matter (NOM) was compared with that of granular activated carbon (GAC). Adsorption equilibrium, kinetic, and pilot-plant experiments were used to compare the adsorbents. Adsorptio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal - American Water Works Association 1994-08, Vol.86 (8), p.64-72
Main Authors: Hand, David W., Herlevich, Jon A., Perram, David L., Crittenden, John C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The performance of a synthetic adsorbent in removing trichloroethene (TCE) from a groundwater containing natural organic matter (NOM) was compared with that of granular activated carbon (GAC). Adsorption equilibrium, kinetic, and pilot-plant experiments were used to compare the adsorbents. Adsorption isotherm studies showed that the synthetic adsorbent had three to four times more TCE capacity than GAC over a TCE concentration range of 10–2,000 µg/L. When preexposed for 24 weeks to a groundwater containing NOM, the synthetic adsorbent showed an average 12 percent loss in capacity compared with the single-solute isotherm performed on the virgin adsorbent; GAC showed an average 35 percent loss in its virgin capacity for a preexposed time of only 10 weeks. Rapid small-scale column tests and model calculations predicted pilot-plant effluent profiles for the synthetic adsorbent. The pilot-plant data confirmed that the synthetic adsorbent is more efficient than GAC in removing TCE.
ISSN:0003-150X
1551-8833
DOI:10.1002/j.1551-8833.1994.tb06239.x