Where’s the Crime? Exploring Divergences Between Call Data and Perceptions of Local Crime

Abstract Scholars typically use calls to the police to study crime patterning; however, crime reporting may be systematic across space. Using spatial video and geonarrative methodology, we investigate the overlap between perceived crime hot spots among 35 neighbourhood insiders (police officers, ex-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of criminology 2020-03, Vol.60 (2), p.444-467
Main Authors: Porter, Lauren C, Curtis, Andrew, Jefferis, Eric, Mitchell, Susanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Crime
CRIME PREVENTION
CRIMINOLOGY
Mixed methods research
Social aspects
VICTIMS OF CRIME
Victims of crimes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Scholars typically use calls to the police to study crime patterning; however, crime reporting may be systematic across space. Using spatial video and geonarrative methodology, we investigate the overlap between perceived crime hot spots among 35 neighbourhood insiders (police officers, ex-offenders and residents) and hot spots gleaned from call data. In general, perceptual hot spots diverge from call data, but in particular, a corner store emerges as a perceptual hot spot across all groups, but not in call data. We use our data to explore the microgeographic dynamics of this ‘hidden hot spot’. We find that the corner store is relatively isolated, with few occupied residences around it and participants avoiding it. In addition, our geonarratives suggest that the store lacks adequate guardianship. We argue that mixed methodological approaches such as these are useful for understanding discrepancies between measures as well as the situational and environmental dynamics of problem places.
ISSN:0007-0955
1464-3529
DOI:10.1093/bjc/azz059