A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to giancola and chermack

Giancola and Chermack responded to our criticisms of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression by arguing that two existing laboratory procedures circumvent the problems raised, and they provide evidence for the validity of these procedures. We argue that Giancola and Chermack do not succeed in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aggression and violent behavior 2000, Vol.5 (2), p.127-136
Main Authors: Tedeschi, James T, Quigley, Brian M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
construct validity and aggression
Laboratory paradigms and human aggression
Medical sciences
Methodology. Experimentation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Techniques and methods
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Giancola and Chermack responded to our criticisms of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression by arguing that two existing laboratory procedures circumvent the problems raised, and they provide evidence for the validity of these procedures. We argue that Giancola and Chermack do not succeed in their defense of existing paradigms for both conceptual and methodological reasons.
ISSN:1359-1789
1873-6335
DOI:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00028-7