Loading…
Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages
The electrical models of bump chip carrier (BCC) packages have been established based on the S-parameter measurement. When compared to the standard thin shrink small outline packages (TSSOPs), BCC packages show much smaller parasitics in the equivalent model. In the simulation, the insertion and ret...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on advanced packaging 2001-11, Vol.24 (4), p.548-554 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993 |
container_end_page | 554 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 548 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on advanced packaging |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng WU, Sung-Mao CHIU, Chi-Tsung HUNG, Chih-Pin |
description | The electrical models of bump chip carrier (BCC) packages have been established based on the S-parameter measurement. When compared to the standard thin shrink small outline packages (TSSOPs), BCC packages show much smaller parasitics in the equivalent model. In the simulation, the insertion and return losses for a packaged 50-/spl Omega/ microstrip line are calculated against frequency. BCC packages are also less lossy than TSSOPs over a wide frequency range. By setting a random variable with Gaussian distribution varied within a certain range for each equivalent circuit element of the packages, the Monte Carlo analysis has been performed to study the package effects on a GaAs heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). Again, BCC packages cause less decrement of HBT unity-gain bandwidth than TSSOPs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/6040.982843 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13487700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>982843</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>26765293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgexYG1duXMVBEWQqfmafCzLpdVCoSC6Hs7NnPSmncmMyYzgP_Bnm-FeKriw3ZxzIM95kze8VfWa0TPGqP2kqKRn1nAjxbPqmDWNrq019Pk6c1YLwcWL6mXOd5QyaSQ_rn5f9OjmFBz0ZMLkxzRAdEjCMKXxJw4Y50zGSL5eXm0yWXKIt2S7DBNxu1AKpBQwkQncPdxiJpCJG4cJEnZkHkmeIXaQyrwLkeRdCvGe5AH6nozL3IeID6un1ZGHPuOrQz-pvl9efNt8qa9vPl9tzq9r11A21w06rSjvJFfSW660tFuATniuPTQMbUM7y50yWwYarPGWKuUVGmOcQWvFSfV-r1v8_Vgwz-0QssO-h4jjkltuBaOsMY-DxnLJlHwCKFh5Jn0cVFo15f4CfvgvyJRmXGhLeUHf_oPejUuK5QdbY6RSjVSrlY97yKUx54S-nVIYIP1qGW3X4LRrcNp9cAr97iAJucTCpxKIkP-uCGm0pqudN3suIOLD8UHkD6BuyqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884665468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng ; WU, Sung-Mao ; CHIU, Chi-Tsung ; HUNG, Chih-Pin</creator><creatorcontrib>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng ; WU, Sung-Mao ; CHIU, Chi-Tsung ; HUNG, Chih-Pin</creatorcontrib><description>The electrical models of bump chip carrier (BCC) packages have been established based on the S-parameter measurement. When compared to the standard thin shrink small outline packages (TSSOPs), BCC packages show much smaller parasitics in the equivalent model. In the simulation, the insertion and return losses for a packaged 50-/spl Omega/ microstrip line are calculated against frequency. BCC packages are also less lossy than TSSOPs over a wide frequency range. By setting a random variable with Gaussian distribution varied within a certain range for each equivalent circuit element of the packages, the Monte Carlo analysis has been performed to study the package effects on a GaAs heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). Again, BCC packages cause less decrement of HBT unity-gain bandwidth than TSSOPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-3323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/6040.982843</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITAPFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Body centered cubic lattice ; Chip carriers ; Circuit properties ; Circuit simulation ; Computer simulation ; Electric variables measurement ; Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits ; Electronic equipment and fabrication. Passive components, printed wiring boards, connectics ; Electronics ; Equivalence ; Exact sciences and technology ; Frequency ; Gallium arsenide ; Heterojunction bipolar transistors ; Insertion loss ; Microstrip ; Microwave circuits, microwave integrated circuits, microwave transmission lines, submillimeter wave circuits ; Monte Carlo methods ; Packages ; Packaging ; Radiofrequency integrated circuits ; Scattering parameters ; Semiconductor device measurement ; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices ; Transistors</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on advanced packaging, 2001-11, Vol.24 (4), p.548-554</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2001</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/982843$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13487700$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Sung-Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHIU, Chi-Tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, Chih-Pin</creatorcontrib><title>Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages</title><title>IEEE transactions on advanced packaging</title><addtitle>TADVP</addtitle><description>The electrical models of bump chip carrier (BCC) packages have been established based on the S-parameter measurement. When compared to the standard thin shrink small outline packages (TSSOPs), BCC packages show much smaller parasitics in the equivalent model. In the simulation, the insertion and return losses for a packaged 50-/spl Omega/ microstrip line are calculated against frequency. BCC packages are also less lossy than TSSOPs over a wide frequency range. By setting a random variable with Gaussian distribution varied within a certain range for each equivalent circuit element of the packages, the Monte Carlo analysis has been performed to study the package effects on a GaAs heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). Again, BCC packages cause less decrement of HBT unity-gain bandwidth than TSSOPs.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Body centered cubic lattice</subject><subject>Chip carriers</subject><subject>Circuit properties</subject><subject>Circuit simulation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Electric variables measurement</subject><subject>Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits</subject><subject>Electronic equipment and fabrication. Passive components, printed wiring boards, connectics</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>Gallium arsenide</subject><subject>Heterojunction bipolar transistors</subject><subject>Insertion loss</subject><subject>Microstrip</subject><subject>Microwave circuits, microwave integrated circuits, microwave transmission lines, submillimeter wave circuits</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Packages</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Radiofrequency integrated circuits</subject><subject>Scattering parameters</subject><subject>Semiconductor device measurement</subject><subject>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><issn>1521-3323</issn><issn>1557-9980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1rFTEUhgexYG1duXMVBEWQqfmafCzLpdVCoSC6Hs7NnPSmncmMyYzgP_Bnm-FeKriw3ZxzIM95kze8VfWa0TPGqP2kqKRn1nAjxbPqmDWNrq019Pk6c1YLwcWL6mXOd5QyaSQ_rn5f9OjmFBz0ZMLkxzRAdEjCMKXxJw4Y50zGSL5eXm0yWXKIt2S7DBNxu1AKpBQwkQncPdxiJpCJG4cJEnZkHkmeIXaQyrwLkeRdCvGe5AH6nozL3IeID6un1ZGHPuOrQz-pvl9efNt8qa9vPl9tzq9r11A21w06rSjvJFfSW660tFuATniuPTQMbUM7y50yWwYarPGWKuUVGmOcQWvFSfV-r1v8_Vgwz-0QssO-h4jjkltuBaOsMY-DxnLJlHwCKFh5Jn0cVFo15f4CfvgvyJRmXGhLeUHf_oPejUuK5QdbY6RSjVSrlY97yKUx54S-nVIYIP1qGW3X4LRrcNp9cAr97iAJucTCpxKIkP-uCGm0pqudN3suIOLD8UHkD6BuyqI</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng</creator><creator>WU, Sung-Mao</creator><creator>CHIU, Chi-Tsung</creator><creator>HUNG, Chih-Pin</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7TB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages</title><author>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng ; WU, Sung-Mao ; CHIU, Chi-Tsung ; HUNG, Chih-Pin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Body centered cubic lattice</topic><topic>Chip carriers</topic><topic>Circuit properties</topic><topic>Circuit simulation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Electric variables measurement</topic><topic>Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits</topic><topic>Electronic equipment and fabrication. Passive components, printed wiring boards, connectics</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>Gallium arsenide</topic><topic>Heterojunction bipolar transistors</topic><topic>Insertion loss</topic><topic>Microstrip</topic><topic>Microwave circuits, microwave integrated circuits, microwave transmission lines, submillimeter wave circuits</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Packages</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Radiofrequency integrated circuits</topic><topic>Scattering parameters</topic><topic>Semiconductor device measurement</topic><topic>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Sung-Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHIU, Chi-Tsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, Chih-Pin</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on advanced packaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HORNG, Tzyy-Sheng</au><au>WU, Sung-Mao</au><au>CHIU, Chi-Tsung</au><au>HUNG, Chih-Pin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on advanced packaging</jtitle><stitle>TADVP</stitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>548</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>548-554</pages><issn>1521-3323</issn><eissn>1557-9980</eissn><coden>ITAPFZ</coden><abstract>The electrical models of bump chip carrier (BCC) packages have been established based on the S-parameter measurement. When compared to the standard thin shrink small outline packages (TSSOPs), BCC packages show much smaller parasitics in the equivalent model. In the simulation, the insertion and return losses for a packaged 50-/spl Omega/ microstrip line are calculated against frequency. BCC packages are also less lossy than TSSOPs over a wide frequency range. By setting a random variable with Gaussian distribution varied within a certain range for each equivalent circuit element of the packages, the Monte Carlo analysis has been performed to study the package effects on a GaAs heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). Again, BCC packages cause less decrement of HBT unity-gain bandwidth than TSSOPs.</abstract><cop>Piscataway, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/6040.982843</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1521-3323 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on advanced packaging, 2001-11, Vol.24 (4), p.548-554 |
issn | 1521-3323 1557-9980 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13487700 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Body centered cubic lattice Chip carriers Circuit properties Circuit simulation Computer simulation Electric variables measurement Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits Electronic equipment and fabrication. Passive components, printed wiring boards, connectics Electronics Equivalence Exact sciences and technology Frequency Gallium arsenide Heterojunction bipolar transistors Insertion loss Microstrip Microwave circuits, microwave integrated circuits, microwave transmission lines, submillimeter wave circuits Monte Carlo methods Packages Packaging Radiofrequency integrated circuits Scattering parameters Semiconductor device measurement Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices Transistors |
title | Electrical performance improvements on RFICs using bump chip carrier packages as compared to standard thin shrink small outline packages |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrical%20performance%20improvements%20on%20RFICs%20using%20bump%20chip%20carrier%20packages%20as%20compared%20to%20standard%20thin%20shrink%20small%20outline%20packages&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20advanced%20packaging&rft.au=HORNG,%20Tzyy-Sheng&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=548&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=548-554&rft.issn=1521-3323&rft.eissn=1557-9980&rft.coden=ITAPFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/6040.982843&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E26765293%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-5ec7602d4264f926749baad3f27fa51e950d92c68b1a7a98f9066f6e888c8e993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884665468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=982843&rfr_iscdi=true |