Loading…
Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 29 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | CULPEPPER, A. S YORK, A. C |
description | New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1417348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988501</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jE1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYc9eGgPad_9yu7qQUrQWugHFEsFkbJJNprSJGV3i_TfG6j0MAzMPDMIDQkMSEz4EJSGCJj86FEA6APhnwBEP65nk9V8-UUHMEgWT_QCdYgQEFHJ4RJ1zqtrdOP9tl3ElEIHPa-tzfHM1ObbVrYOuKzxahecwXPjXPOLl62SJoSmxr1x4_1xXx4q_FM6fwiHqn-Lrgqz8_bu37to9frynrxF08V4koym0ZYCC5HWklMrLKScxswobgoiU52maSHjLJOFbkMQOSOMaS2YyBVPRU6FoCpmSrMuejj97o3PzK5wps5Kv9m7sjLuuCGcSMZVi92fsK0PjTvXTCslgLA_2LhZYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</creator><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><description>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Amaranth ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Cotton ; Crop harvesting ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; No tillage ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Planting ; Row spacing ; Tillage ; Transgenic plants ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1417348$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</description><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>No tillage</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Row spacing</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Transgenic plants</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jE1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYc9eGgPad_9yu7qQUrQWugHFEsFkbJJNprSJGV3i_TfG6j0MAzMPDMIDQkMSEz4EJSGCJj86FEA6APhnwBEP65nk9V8-UUHMEgWT_QCdYgQEFHJ4RJ1zqtrdOP9tl3ElEIHPa-tzfHM1ObbVrYOuKzxahecwXPjXPOLl62SJoSmxr1x4_1xXx4q_FM6fwiHqn-Lrgqz8_bu37to9frynrxF08V4koym0ZYCC5HWklMrLKScxswobgoiU52maSHjLJOFbkMQOSOMaS2YyBVPRU6FoCpmSrMuejj97o3PzK5wps5Kv9m7sjLuuCGcSMZVi92fsK0PjTvXTCslgLA_2LhZYQ</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>CULPEPPER, A. S</creator><creator>YORK, A. C</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><author>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>No tillage</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Row spacing</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Transgenic plants</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CULPEPPER, A. S</au><au>YORK, A. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>19-29</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1417348 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Amaranth Biological and medical sciences Chemical control Cotton Crop harvesting Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herbicides No tillage Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Planting Row spacing Tillage Transgenic plants Weed control Weeds |
title | Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weed%20Management%20in%20Ultra%20Narrow%20Row%20Cotton%20(Gossypium%20hirsutum)&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=CULPEPPER,%20A.%20S&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=19-29&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014%5B0019:WMIUNR%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E3988501%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988501&rfr_iscdi=true |