Loading…

Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29
Main Authors: CULPEPPER, A. S, YORK, A. C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 14
creator CULPEPPER, A. S
YORK, A. C
description New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1417348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3988501</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3988501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jE1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYc9eGgPad_9yu7qQUrQWugHFEsFkbJJNprSJGV3i_TfG6j0MAzMPDMIDQkMSEz4EJSGCJj86FEA6APhnwBEP65nk9V8-UUHMEgWT_QCdYgQEFHJ4RJ1zqtrdOP9tl3ElEIHPa-tzfHM1ObbVrYOuKzxahecwXPjXPOLl62SJoSmxr1x4_1xXx4q_FM6fwiHqn-Lrgqz8_bu37to9frynrxF08V4koym0ZYCC5HWklMrLKScxswobgoiU52maSHjLJOFbkMQOSOMaS2YyBVPRU6FoCpmSrMuejj97o3PzK5wps5Kv9m7sjLuuCGcSMZVi92fsK0PjTvXTCslgLA_2LhZYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</creator><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><description>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Amaranth ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Cotton ; Crop harvesting ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; No tillage ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Planting ; Row spacing ; Tillage ; Transgenic plants ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3988501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3988501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1417348$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</description><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>No tillage</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Row spacing</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Transgenic plants</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jE1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYc9eGgPad_9yu7qQUrQWugHFEsFkbJJNprSJGV3i_TfG6j0MAzMPDMIDQkMSEz4EJSGCJj86FEA6APhnwBEP65nk9V8-UUHMEgWT_QCdYgQEFHJ4RJ1zqtrdOP9tl3ElEIHPa-tzfHM1ObbVrYOuKzxahecwXPjXPOLl62SJoSmxr1x4_1xXx4q_FM6fwiHqn-Lrgqz8_bu37to9frynrxF08V4koym0ZYCC5HWklMrLKScxswobgoiU52maSHjLJOFbkMQOSOMaS2YyBVPRU6FoCpmSrMuejj97o3PzK5wps5Kv9m7sjLuuCGcSMZVi92fsK0PjTvXTCslgLA_2LhZYQ</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>CULPEPPER, A. S</creator><creator>YORK, A. C</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</title><author>CULPEPPER, A. S ; YORK, A. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>No tillage</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Row spacing</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Transgenic plants</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CULPEPPER, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YORK, A. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CULPEPPER, A. S</au><au>YORK, A. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>19-29</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>New weed management tools and growth regulators make production of ultra narrow row (UNR) cotton possible. Weed control, cotton yield, fiber quality, and net returns were compared in UNR bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton. Weeds included broadleaf signalgrass, carpetweed, common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, jimsonweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory. Pendimethalin preplant incorporated (PPI) in conventional-tillage or preemergence (PRE) in no-till systems plus fluometuron PRE did not adequately control many of these weeds. Pyrithiobac plus MSMA early postemergence (POST) often was more effective than pyrithiobac alone. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 82%, goosegrass 89%, Palmer amaranth 92%, and the other species at least 95% late season. Pyrithiobac at mid-POST did not improve control. Bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST was more effective than bromoxynil alone only on sicklepod. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST controlled sicklepod 62%, Palmer amaranth 81%, goosegrass 83%, and all other species at least 95%. Glyphosate early POST did not adequately control many species due to sustained weed emergence. Glyphosate early POST followed by glyphosate late POST (after last effective bloom date) controlled all species except pitted morningglory and tall morningglory at least 93%. Pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by glyphosate early POST was the most effective glyphosate system overall, and it controlled sicklepod 88%, pitted morningglory 90%, and other species at least 93%. Glyphosate late POST did not increase control in systems with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Yields and net returns were similar with all herbicide/cultivar systems at two of five locations. At other locations, yields and net returns were similar with systems of pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by pyrithiobac plus MSMA early POST, pendimethalin plus fluometuron followed by bromoxynil plus MSMA early POST, and glyphosate early POST. Greatest yields and net returns were obtained with pendimethalin plus fluometuron at planting followed by glyphosate early POST. Herbicide systems did not affect fiber quality.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0019:WMIUNR]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2000-01, Vol.14 (1), p.19-29
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1417348
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Amaranth
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical control
Cotton
Crop harvesting
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicides
No tillage
Parasitic plants. Weeds
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Planting
Row spacing
Tillage
Transgenic plants
Weed control
Weeds
title Weed Management in Ultra Narrow Row Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weed%20Management%20in%20Ultra%20Narrow%20Row%20Cotton%20(Gossypium%20hirsutum)&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=CULPEPPER,%20A.%20S&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=19-29&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014%5B0019:WMIUNR%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E3988501%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-99742e5e0b4263a84af17b9bbbf76cc7f93a805d313399535d84b5d2552863893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3988501&rfr_iscdi=true