Loading…

MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error

We studied simulated MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) code type stability and change expected with measurement error for 12 MMPI-2 well-defined mean code type profiles. Profile scores for the 2 scales defining the code type were systematically varied to represent ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality assessment 2004-04, Vol.82 (2), p.179-188
Main Authors: Munley, Patrick H., Germain, Jean M., Tovar-Murray, Darrick, Borgman, Amy L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62be328aa7d2076f5a0d848f383dc167ae78d765465d9e795e1079d197cd8c4f3
container_end_page 188
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title Journal of personality assessment
container_volume 82
creator Munley, Patrick H.
Germain, Jean M.
Tovar-Murray, Darrick
Borgman, Amy L.
description We studied simulated MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) code type stability and change expected with measurement error for 12 MMPI-2 well-defined mean code type profiles. Profile scores for the 2 scales defining the code type were systematically varied to represent target code type profiles at 9 different levels of T-score profile definition. We randomly generated samples of 50 simulated, estimated true score profiles at each level of profile definition for each code type around the estimated true scores for each scale at each level of profile definition. Two sets of simulated profiles were developed. The first simulation was based on the reported means, test-retest reliabilities, and the standard errors of measurement for the MMPI-2 normative group. The second simulation was based on the means, standard deviations, and estimated retest stability for a clinical group of psychiatric patients. We calculated frequencies and percentages of simulated profiles with the highest estimated true scores on the same 2 scales as the original code type profile. Percentages of simulated profiles with the same 2 highest scales as the original code type profiles increased from 27% to 37% for the 3-point level of definition, 37% to 49% for the 5-point definition, 46% to 61% for 7-point definition, 63% to 78% for 10-point definition, 78% to 89% for 13-point definition, 83% to 93% for 15-point definition, and greater than 90% for profile definition greater than 15 points.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15630572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>626401581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62be328aa7d2076f5a0d848f383dc167ae78d765465d9e795e1079d197cd8c4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AQ8SBL3F7s5m_-TgQUrVQos91POyzW4gJcnG3QTptzelFUVB5zIw_N7jzUPokuA7AliMA2EUhGCwabQEDIofoeHuFu-Ox2iIMUBMZUoG6CyEDcaYkARO0YAwnBAGyRCNF4vlLIZo6V1elDaaOGOj1baxIdK1iRZWh87bytZtNPXe-XN0kusy2IvDHqHXx-lq8hzPX55mk4d5nNEU2pjD2lKQWgvTJ-U509jIROZUUpMRLrQV0gjOEs5MakXKLMEiNSQVmZFZktMRut37Nt69dTa0qipCZstS19Z1QQkiOOnnX5AJwkFi6MHrH-DGdb7un1AAKcOCsqSHYA9l3oXgba4aX1TabxXBale6-l16L7o6OHfrypovyaHlHrg5ADpkusy9rrMifOM4xUzsIt7vuaLOna_0u_OlUa3els5_iugfQT4APcWbCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229507354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Munley, Patrick H. ; Germain, Jean M. ; Tovar-Murray, Darrick ; Borgman, Amy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munley, Patrick H. ; Germain, Jean M. ; Tovar-Murray, Darrick ; Borgman, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><description>We studied simulated MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, &amp; Kaemmer, 1989) code type stability and change expected with measurement error for 12 MMPI-2 well-defined mean code type profiles. Profile scores for the 2 scales defining the code type were systematically varied to represent target code type profiles at 9 different levels of T-score profile definition. We randomly generated samples of 50 simulated, estimated true score profiles at each level of profile definition for each code type around the estimated true scores for each scale at each level of profile definition. Two sets of simulated profiles were developed. The first simulation was based on the reported means, test-retest reliabilities, and the standard errors of measurement for the MMPI-2 normative group. The second simulation was based on the means, standard deviations, and estimated retest stability for a clinical group of psychiatric patients. We calculated frequencies and percentages of simulated profiles with the highest estimated true scores on the same 2 scales as the original code type profile. Percentages of simulated profiles with the same 2 highest scales as the original code type profiles increased from 27% to 37% for the 3-point level of definition, 37% to 49% for the 5-point definition, 46% to 61% for 7-point definition, 63% to 78% for 10-point definition, 78% to 89% for 13-point definition, 83% to 93% for 15-point definition, and greater than 90% for profile definition greater than 15 points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15041524</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNPABU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 ; MMPI - standards ; Personality ; Personality tests ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Stability ; Techniques and methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality assessment, 2004-04, Vol.82 (2), p.179-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62be328aa7d2076f5a0d848f383dc167ae78d765465d9e795e1079d197cd8c4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15630572$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15041524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munley, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germain, Jean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovar-Murray, Darrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgman, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><title>MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error</title><title>Journal of personality assessment</title><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><description>We studied simulated MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, &amp; Kaemmer, 1989) code type stability and change expected with measurement error for 12 MMPI-2 well-defined mean code type profiles. Profile scores for the 2 scales defining the code type were systematically varied to represent target code type profiles at 9 different levels of T-score profile definition. We randomly generated samples of 50 simulated, estimated true score profiles at each level of profile definition for each code type around the estimated true scores for each scale at each level of profile definition. Two sets of simulated profiles were developed. The first simulation was based on the reported means, test-retest reliabilities, and the standard errors of measurement for the MMPI-2 normative group. The second simulation was based on the means, standard deviations, and estimated retest stability for a clinical group of psychiatric patients. We calculated frequencies and percentages of simulated profiles with the highest estimated true scores on the same 2 scales as the original code type profile. Percentages of simulated profiles with the same 2 highest scales as the original code type profiles increased from 27% to 37% for the 3-point level of definition, 37% to 49% for the 5-point definition, 46% to 61% for 7-point definition, 63% to 78% for 10-point definition, 78% to 89% for 13-point definition, 83% to 93% for 15-point definition, and greater than 90% for profile definition greater than 15 points.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2</subject><subject>MMPI - standards</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-3891</issn><issn>1532-7752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-AQ8SBL3F7s5m_-TgQUrVQos91POyzW4gJcnG3QTptzelFUVB5zIw_N7jzUPokuA7AliMA2EUhGCwabQEDIofoeHuFu-Ox2iIMUBMZUoG6CyEDcaYkARO0YAwnBAGyRCNF4vlLIZo6V1elDaaOGOj1baxIdK1iRZWh87bytZtNPXe-XN0kusy2IvDHqHXx-lq8hzPX55mk4d5nNEU2pjD2lKQWgvTJ-U509jIROZUUpMRLrQV0gjOEs5MakXKLMEiNSQVmZFZktMRut37Nt69dTa0qipCZstS19Z1QQkiOOnnX5AJwkFi6MHrH-DGdb7un1AAKcOCsqSHYA9l3oXgba4aX1TabxXBale6-l16L7o6OHfrypovyaHlHrg5ADpkusy9rrMifOM4xUzsIt7vuaLOna_0u_OlUa3els5_iugfQT4APcWbCg</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Munley, Patrick H.</creator><creator>Germain, Jean M.</creator><creator>Tovar-Murray, Darrick</creator><creator>Borgman, Amy L.</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error</title><author>Munley, Patrick H. ; Germain, Jean M. ; Tovar-Murray, Darrick ; Borgman, Amy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62be328aa7d2076f5a0d848f383dc167ae78d765465d9e795e1079d197cd8c4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2</topic><topic>MMPI - standards</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munley, Patrick H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germain, Jean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tovar-Murray, Darrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borgman, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munley, Patrick H.</au><au>Germain, Jean M.</au><au>Tovar-Murray, Darrick</au><au>Borgman, Amy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality assessment</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Assess</addtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>179-188</pages><issn>0022-3891</issn><eissn>1532-7752</eissn><coden>JNPABU</coden><abstract>We studied simulated MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, &amp; Kaemmer, 1989) code type stability and change expected with measurement error for 12 MMPI-2 well-defined mean code type profiles. Profile scores for the 2 scales defining the code type were systematically varied to represent target code type profiles at 9 different levels of T-score profile definition. We randomly generated samples of 50 simulated, estimated true score profiles at each level of profile definition for each code type around the estimated true scores for each scale at each level of profile definition. Two sets of simulated profiles were developed. The first simulation was based on the reported means, test-retest reliabilities, and the standard errors of measurement for the MMPI-2 normative group. The second simulation was based on the means, standard deviations, and estimated retest stability for a clinical group of psychiatric patients. We calculated frequencies and percentages of simulated profiles with the highest estimated true scores on the same 2 scales as the original code type profile. Percentages of simulated profiles with the same 2 highest scales as the original code type profiles increased from 27% to 37% for the 3-point level of definition, 37% to 49% for the 5-point definition, 46% to 61% for 7-point definition, 63% to 78% for 10-point definition, 78% to 89% for 13-point definition, 83% to 93% for 15-point definition, and greater than 90% for profile definition greater than 15 points.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><pmid>15041524</pmid><doi>10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3891
ispartof Journal of personality assessment, 2004-04, Vol.82 (2), p.179-188
issn 0022-3891
1532-7752
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15630572
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2
MMPI - standards
Personality
Personality tests
Psychological tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reliability
Stability
Techniques and methods
United States
title MMPI-2 Profile Code Types and Measurement Error
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T01%3A45%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MMPI-2%20Profile%20Code%20Types%20and%20Measurement%20Error&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20assessment&rft.au=Munley,%20Patrick%20H.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=179-188&rft.issn=0022-3891&rft.eissn=1532-7752&rft.coden=JNPABU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E626401581%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62be328aa7d2076f5a0d848f383dc167ae78d765465d9e795e1079d197cd8c4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229507354&rft_id=info:pmid/15041524&rfr_iscdi=true