Loading…

Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations

Dust storms are recognized as having a very wide range of environmental impacts. Their geomorphological interest lies in the amount of deflation and wind erosion they indicate and their role in loess formation. Atmospheric mineral-dust loading is one of the largest uncertainties in global climate-ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2003-06, Vol.93 (2), p.297-313
Main Authors: Washington, Richard, Todd, Martin, Middleton, Nicholas J., Goudie, Andrew S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733
container_end_page 313
container_issue 2
container_start_page 297
container_title Annals of the Association of American Geographers
container_volume 93
creator Washington, Richard
Todd, Martin
Middleton, Nicholas J.
Goudie, Andrew S.
description Dust storms are recognized as having a very wide range of environmental impacts. Their geomorphological interest lies in the amount of deflation and wind erosion they indicate and their role in loess formation. Atmospheric mineral-dust loading is one of the largest uncertainties in global climate-change modeling and is known to have an important impact on the radiation budget and atmospheric instability. Major gaps remain in our understanding of the geomorphological context of terrestrial sources and the transport mechanisms responsible for the production and distribution of atmospheric dust, all of which are important in reducing uncertainties in the modeling of past and future climate. Using meteorological data from ground stations, from the space-borne Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer (TOMS), and from the National Center for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis project, we illustrate the key source regions of dust and demonstrate the primacy of the Sahara. Objectively defined source regions for the Sahara are determined from eigenvector techniques applied to the TOMS data. Other key regions include the Middle East, Taklamakan, southwest Asia, central Australia, the Etosha and Mkgadikgadi basins of southern Africa, the Salar de Uyuni (Bolivia), and the Great Basin (United States). In most of these regions, large basins of internal drainage, as defined from a digital elevation model, are dust sources where the near-surface atmospheric circulation (determined by calculated means of potential sand flux) is favorable for dust mobilization. Surface observations indicate some regions as being important that do not appear on the TOMS maps. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8306.9302003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_16188444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1515559</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1515559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhosoOK7-AMGLIOhd16T5aIreDLvuKqw7F7Neh9P0VDu0yZi0LuOvN6WjA4JsbkLOed43H2-y7CWj5yyNd0yoMtecqvOK04JS_ihb_a09zlaUUpFLRfXT7FmMu7RkXIlV1l5Occy3ow8D2fopWCTrgBDJJY4Yhs5hQ-oDGb8jufMj9GTzyzskX7zrkqZz38h2j3YMfph5Aq4h2ym0kHw2dcTwE8bOu_g8e9JCH_HFcT7Lvl59vLv4lN9srj9frG9ykIzxvNJtU5ecV1rXAkrelKoAbCwD3RayKhE5lZCKaAUIBAHU1oraRtZtpZPwLHu7-O6D_zFhHM3QRYt9Dw79FA3XohKyKh4EmWJKKs4S-PofcJeeyaVLmIJqWpa6mN3YAtngYwzYmn3oBggHw6iZ8zFzFmbOwhzzSZo3R2OIFvo2gLNdPAkV01oIkbj3C3ff9Xh42Nisb2_X9LTLq0W9iymvk1oyKWWV2h-Wdufa9AXg3oe-MSMceh_-nIj__w6_AcyMvNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208077822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Washington, Richard ; Todd, Martin ; Middleton, Nicholas J. ; Goudie, Andrew S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Washington, Richard ; Todd, Martin ; Middleton, Nicholas J. ; Goudie, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><description>Dust storms are recognized as having a very wide range of environmental impacts. Their geomorphological interest lies in the amount of deflation and wind erosion they indicate and their role in loess formation. Atmospheric mineral-dust loading is one of the largest uncertainties in global climate-change modeling and is known to have an important impact on the radiation budget and atmospheric instability. Major gaps remain in our understanding of the geomorphological context of terrestrial sources and the transport mechanisms responsible for the production and distribution of atmospheric dust, all of which are important in reducing uncertainties in the modeling of past and future climate. Using meteorological data from ground stations, from the space-borne Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer (TOMS), and from the National Center for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis project, we illustrate the key source regions of dust and demonstrate the primacy of the Sahara. Objectively defined source regions for the Sahara are determined from eigenvector techniques applied to the TOMS data. Other key regions include the Middle East, Taklamakan, southwest Asia, central Australia, the Etosha and Mkgadikgadi basins of southern Africa, the Salar de Uyuni (Bolivia), and the Great Basin (United States). In most of these regions, large basins of internal drainage, as defined from a digital elevation model, are dust sources where the near-surface atmospheric circulation (determined by calculated means of potential sand flux) is favorable for dust mobilization. Surface observations indicate some regions as being important that do not appear on the TOMS maps. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-5608</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2469-4452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2469-4460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8306.9302003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAAGAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Artificial satellites ; Atmosphere. Circulation. Winds ; Atmospheric circulation ; Atmospherics ; Bgi / Prodig ; Climate models ; Climatology ; Deserts ; Dust ; dust source areas ; Dust storms ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Sciences ; Geography ; Monitoring ; Paleoclimatology ; Physical geography ; Pollution ; Radiation ; Sediments ; Storms ; TOMS ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003-06, Vol.93 (2), p.297-313</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2003</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Association of American Geographers</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1515559$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1515559$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16188444$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Washington, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><title>Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations</title><title>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</title><description>Dust storms are recognized as having a very wide range of environmental impacts. Their geomorphological interest lies in the amount of deflation and wind erosion they indicate and their role in loess formation. Atmospheric mineral-dust loading is one of the largest uncertainties in global climate-change modeling and is known to have an important impact on the radiation budget and atmospheric instability. Major gaps remain in our understanding of the geomorphological context of terrestrial sources and the transport mechanisms responsible for the production and distribution of atmospheric dust, all of which are important in reducing uncertainties in the modeling of past and future climate. Using meteorological data from ground stations, from the space-borne Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer (TOMS), and from the National Center for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis project, we illustrate the key source regions of dust and demonstrate the primacy of the Sahara. Objectively defined source regions for the Sahara are determined from eigenvector techniques applied to the TOMS data. Other key regions include the Middle East, Taklamakan, southwest Asia, central Australia, the Etosha and Mkgadikgadi basins of southern Africa, the Salar de Uyuni (Bolivia), and the Great Basin (United States). In most of these regions, large basins of internal drainage, as defined from a digital elevation model, are dust sources where the near-surface atmospheric circulation (determined by calculated means of potential sand flux) is favorable for dust mobilization. Surface observations indicate some regions as being important that do not appear on the TOMS maps. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are explored.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Atmosphere. Circulation. Winds</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>dust source areas</subject><subject>Dust storms</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Paleoclimatology</subject><subject>Physical geography</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>TOMS</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><issn>1467-8306</issn><issn>2469-4460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhosoOK7-AMGLIOhd16T5aIreDLvuKqw7F7Neh9P0VDu0yZi0LuOvN6WjA4JsbkLOed43H2-y7CWj5yyNd0yoMtecqvOK04JS_ihb_a09zlaUUpFLRfXT7FmMu7RkXIlV1l5Occy3ow8D2fopWCTrgBDJJY4Yhs5hQ-oDGb8jufMj9GTzyzskX7zrkqZz38h2j3YMfph5Aq4h2ym0kHw2dcTwE8bOu_g8e9JCH_HFcT7Lvl59vLv4lN9srj9frG9ykIzxvNJtU5ecV1rXAkrelKoAbCwD3RayKhE5lZCKaAUIBAHU1oraRtZtpZPwLHu7-O6D_zFhHM3QRYt9Dw79FA3XohKyKh4EmWJKKs4S-PofcJeeyaVLmIJqWpa6mN3YAtngYwzYmn3oBggHw6iZ8zFzFmbOwhzzSZo3R2OIFvo2gLNdPAkV01oIkbj3C3ff9Xh42Nisb2_X9LTLq0W9iymvk1oyKWWV2h-Wdufa9AXg3oe-MSMceh_-nIj__w6_AcyMvNU</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>Washington, Richard</creator><creator>Todd, Martin</creator><creator>Middleton, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Goudie, Andrew S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Association of American Geographers</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations</title><author>Washington, Richard ; Todd, Martin ; Middleton, Nicholas J. ; Goudie, Andrew S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Atmosphere. Circulation. Winds</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>dust source areas</topic><topic>Dust storms</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Paleoclimatology</topic><topic>Physical geography</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>TOMS</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Washington, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Washington, Richard</au><au>Todd, Martin</au><au>Middleton, Nicholas J.</au><au>Goudie, Andrew S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</jtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>297-313</pages><issn>0004-5608</issn><issn>2469-4452</issn><eissn>1467-8306</eissn><eissn>2469-4460</eissn><coden>AAAGAK</coden><abstract>Dust storms are recognized as having a very wide range of environmental impacts. Their geomorphological interest lies in the amount of deflation and wind erosion they indicate and their role in loess formation. Atmospheric mineral-dust loading is one of the largest uncertainties in global climate-change modeling and is known to have an important impact on the radiation budget and atmospheric instability. Major gaps remain in our understanding of the geomorphological context of terrestrial sources and the transport mechanisms responsible for the production and distribution of atmospheric dust, all of which are important in reducing uncertainties in the modeling of past and future climate. Using meteorological data from ground stations, from the space-borne Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer (TOMS), and from the National Center for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis project, we illustrate the key source regions of dust and demonstrate the primacy of the Sahara. Objectively defined source regions for the Sahara are determined from eigenvector techniques applied to the TOMS data. Other key regions include the Middle East, Taklamakan, southwest Asia, central Australia, the Etosha and Mkgadikgadi basins of southern Africa, the Salar de Uyuni (Bolivia), and the Great Basin (United States). In most of these regions, large basins of internal drainage, as defined from a digital elevation model, are dust sources where the near-surface atmospheric circulation (determined by calculated means of potential sand flux) is favorable for dust mobilization. Surface observations indicate some regions as being important that do not appear on the TOMS maps. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are explored.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8306.9302003</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-5608
ispartof Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003-06, Vol.93 (2), p.297-313
issn 0004-5608
2469-4452
1467-8306
2469-4460
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_16188444
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Aerosols
Artificial satellites
Atmosphere. Circulation. Winds
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospherics
Bgi / Prodig
Climate models
Climatology
Deserts
Dust
dust source areas
Dust storms
Environment
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Sciences
Geography
Monitoring
Paleoclimatology
Physical geography
Pollution
Radiation
Sediments
Storms
TOMS
Weather
title Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A10%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dust-Storm%20Source%20Areas%20Determined%20by%20the%20Total%20Ozone%20Monitoring%20Spectrometer%20and%20Surface%20Observations&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Association%20of%20American%20Geographers&rft.au=Washington,%20Richard&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=297-313&rft.issn=0004-5608&rft.eissn=1467-8306&rft.coden=AAAGAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8306.9302003&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E1515559%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5113-98fdb733988b4a73d762aedc1a8f2597ee305a762ec4a4ea4a0cb60cd5bf98733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208077822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1515559&rfr_iscdi=true