Fecal water as a non-invasive biomarker in nutritional intervention: comparison of preparation methods and refinement of different endpoints

• Published in: Nutrition and cancer 2007-01, Vol.57 (2), p.158-167
• Main Authors: Klinder, A, Karlsson, P.C, Clune, Y, Hughes, R, Glei, M, Rafter, J.J, Rowland, I, Collins, J.K, Pool-Zobel, B.L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Biomarkers; carcinogenesis; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards; colon; Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology; Comet Assay; cultured cells; disease course; DNA Damage; endpoints; Epidemiology; feces; Feces - chemistry; freeze drying; genotoxicity; HT29 Cells; Humans; measurement; Medical sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; neoplasms; Neoplasms - epidemiology; new methods; noninvasive measures; nutritional intervention; Other treatments; Risk Assessment; sample preparation; Treatment. General aspects; Tumors; volume; Water; water content
• ISSN: 0163-5581; 1532-7914
• DOI: 10.1080/01635580701274848

The assessment of cellular effects by the aqueous phase of human feces (fecal water, FW) is a useful biomarker approach to study cancer risks and protective activities of food. In order to refine and develop the biomarker, different protocols of preparing FW were compared. Fecal waters were prepared by 3 methods: (A) direct centrifugation; (B) extraction of feces in PBS before centrifugation; and (C) centrifugation of lyophilized and reconstituted feces. Genotoxicity was determined in colon cells using the Comet assay. Selected samples were investigated for additional parameters related to carcinogenesis. Two of 7 FWs obtained by methods A and B were similarly genotoxic. Method B, however, yielded higher volumes of FW, allowing sterile filtration for long-term culture experiments. Four of 7 samples were non-genotoxic when prepared according to all 3 methods. FW from lyophilized feces and from fresh samples were equally genotoxic. FWs modulated cytotoxicity, paracellular permeability, and invasion, independent of their genotoxicity. All 3 methods of FW preparation can be used to assess genotoxicity. The higher volumes of FW obtained by preparation method B greatly enhance the perspectives of measuring different types of biological parameters and using these to disclose activities related to cancer development.