Loading…
Health-Related Quality of Life: Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of SF-36, EQ-15D, EQ-5D, RAQoL, and HAQ in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Objective To compare validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Two samples of patients completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), EuroQol (EQ)-5D, 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of rheumatology 2008-08, Vol.35 (8), p.1528-1537 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To compare validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
instruments in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods
Two samples of patients completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), EuroQol (EQ)-5D, 15D, Rheumatoid
Arthritis Quality of Life Scale (RAQoL), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, fatigue,
and global RA. Validity (convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) was evaluated in a cross-section of 200 patients. Reliability
was evaluated by agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient; baseline to 2 weeks) and internal consistency (Cronbachâs
alpha); and responsiveness by the standardized response mean stratified on improvement, status quo, or deterioration in health
status after 6 months in 150 patients followed longitudinally. Followup questionnaires (at 2 weeks and 6 months) included
questions about changes in health status since baseline.
Results
The cross-sectional sample included 77% women, median age 57 years (range 19â87), disease duration 6 years (0â58), with Disease
Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) of 3.10 (1.21â6.47). The longitudinal sample included 80% women, median age 60 years
(22â82). Validity: all instruments discriminated between low, moderate, and high DAS28. Reliability: RAQoL and HAQ displayed
good repeatability (ICC > 0.95) and internal consistency (Cronbachâs alpha > 0.90). Responsiveness: SF-36 bodily pain scale
and VAS pain were responsive to both improvement and deterioration.
Conclusion
All instruments were valid measures for HRQOL in RA. The RAQoL and HAQ displayed the best reliability, while the SF-36 bodily
pain scale and VAS pain were the most responsive. The choice of instrument should depend on the study objectives.
Key Indexing Terms:
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE
VALIDITY
RELIABILITY
RESPONSIVENESS |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0315-162X 1499-2752 |