Loading…

The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures

We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of health communication 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241
Main Authors: Chin, Jessie, Morrow, Daniel G., Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L., Conner-Garcia, Thembi, Graumlich, James F., Murray, Michael D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933
container_end_page 241
container_issue sup3
container_start_page 222
container_title Journal of health communication
container_volume 16
creator Chin, Jessie
Morrow, Daniel G.
Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.
Conner-Garcia, Thembi
Graumlich, James F.
Murray, Michael D.
description We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_24746236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896393203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxCykBCrDH4lsVmAqlGhiKlgMV1bjnPTceXYUzvpKP-ehJkpjwVsbOve71yd65NlLwleECzwu-kguGJ4QTEhixLzCtNH2elUrnLMSfH455vkM3OSPUvpFmPCKJVPsxNKZEFowU-ztN4A-h6DgZTyrz7sHDQ3gK5CAw6FFl2Cdv0GrWwPUZvxPbq4tw14A6iNoUMaLUO3DR58b7VD5167Mdk0K9e7MDe74N2IrhM06Ap0GiKk59mTVrsELw73WXb96WK9vMxX3z5_WZ6vclMUtM9LUzaC1qIuTSG1rDkXDHPNKQgpjWg4IbhgstVCckFLLnHV1rqoW8zACMnYWfZhP3c71B00ZjIZtVPbaDsdRxW0VX92vN2om3CvGCOYleU04O1hQAx3A6RedTYZcE57CENSEmPGi4r_nxSyZJJRPJt6_Rd5G4Y4_dsMFaIUglUTxPeQiSGlCO2DaYLVnL46pq_m9NU-_Un26veFH0THuCfgzQHQyWjXRu2NTb84Pu1C2bzOxz1nfRtip3chukb1enQhHkXsn1Z-AJNuyqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>895868837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-0730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1087-0415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21951254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult literacy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Female ; Health care ; Health education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Literacy ; Health policy ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertension - psychology ; Information ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental Processes ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Psychological ; Older people ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Journal of health communication, 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2011</rights><rights>Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24746236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graumlich, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><title>Journal of health communication</title><addtitle>J Health Commun</addtitle><description>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</description><subject>Adult literacy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Literacy</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - psychology</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>1081-0730</issn><issn>1087-0415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxCykBCrDH4lsVmAqlGhiKlgMV1bjnPTceXYUzvpKP-ehJkpjwVsbOve71yd65NlLwleECzwu-kguGJ4QTEhixLzCtNH2elUrnLMSfH455vkM3OSPUvpFmPCKJVPsxNKZEFowU-ztN4A-h6DgZTyrz7sHDQ3gK5CAw6FFl2Cdv0GrWwPUZvxPbq4tw14A6iNoUMaLUO3DR58b7VD5167Mdk0K9e7MDe74N2IrhM06Ap0GiKk59mTVrsELw73WXb96WK9vMxX3z5_WZ6vclMUtM9LUzaC1qIuTSG1rDkXDHPNKQgpjWg4IbhgstVCckFLLnHV1rqoW8zACMnYWfZhP3c71B00ZjIZtVPbaDsdRxW0VX92vN2om3CvGCOYleU04O1hQAx3A6RedTYZcE57CENSEmPGi4r_nxSyZJJRPJt6_Rd5G4Y4_dsMFaIUglUTxPeQiSGlCO2DaYLVnL46pq_m9NU-_Un26veFH0THuCfgzQHQyWjXRu2NTb84Pu1C2bzOxz1nfRtip3chukb1enQhHkXsn1Z-AJNuyqA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Chin, Jessie</creator><creator>Morrow, Daniel G.</creator><creator>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creator><creator>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creator><creator>Graumlich, James F.</creator><creator>Murray, Michael D.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><author>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult literacy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Literacy</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - psychology</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graumlich, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of health communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Jessie</au><au>Morrow, Daniel G.</au><au>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</au><au>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</au><au>Graumlich, James F.</au><au>Murray, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health communication</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Commun</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>sup3</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>222-241</pages><issn>1081-0730</issn><eissn>1087-0415</eissn><abstract>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>21951254</pmid><doi>10.1080/10810730.2011.604702</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-0730
ispartof Journal of health communication, 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241
issn 1081-0730
1087-0415
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_24746236
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Adult literacy
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Educational Measurement - methods
Female
Health care
Health education
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Literacy
Health policy
Health technology assessment
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension - psychology
Information
Knowledge
Male
Medical sciences
Memory, Short-Term
Mental Processes
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Models, Psychological
Older people
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Vocabulary
title The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Process-Knowledge%20Model%20of%20Health%20Literacy:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Componential%20Analysis%20of%20Two%20Commonly%20Used%20Measures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20communication&rft.au=Chin,%20Jessie&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=sup3&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=222-241&rft.issn=1081-0730&rft.eissn=1087-0415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10810730.2011.604702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E896393203%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=895868837&rft_id=info:pmid/21951254&rfr_iscdi=true