Loading…
The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures
We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One h...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of health communication 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933 |
container_end_page | 241 |
container_issue | sup3 |
container_start_page | 222 |
container_title | Journal of health communication |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Chin, Jessie Morrow, Daniel G. Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. Conner-Garcia, Thembi Graumlich, James F. Murray, Michael D. |
description | We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_24746236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896393203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxCykBCrDH4lsVmAqlGhiKlgMV1bjnPTceXYUzvpKP-ehJkpjwVsbOve71yd65NlLwleECzwu-kguGJ4QTEhixLzCtNH2elUrnLMSfH455vkM3OSPUvpFmPCKJVPsxNKZEFowU-ztN4A-h6DgZTyrz7sHDQ3gK5CAw6FFl2Cdv0GrWwPUZvxPbq4tw14A6iNoUMaLUO3DR58b7VD5167Mdk0K9e7MDe74N2IrhM06Ap0GiKk59mTVrsELw73WXb96WK9vMxX3z5_WZ6vclMUtM9LUzaC1qIuTSG1rDkXDHPNKQgpjWg4IbhgstVCckFLLnHV1rqoW8zACMnYWfZhP3c71B00ZjIZtVPbaDsdRxW0VX92vN2om3CvGCOYleU04O1hQAx3A6RedTYZcE57CENSEmPGi4r_nxSyZJJRPJt6_Rd5G4Y4_dsMFaIUglUTxPeQiSGlCO2DaYLVnL46pq_m9NU-_Un26veFH0THuCfgzQHQyWjXRu2NTb84Pu1C2bzOxz1nfRtip3chukb1enQhHkXsn1Z-AJNuyqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>895868837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-0730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1087-0415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21951254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult literacy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Female ; Health care ; Health education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Literacy ; Health policy ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertension - psychology ; Information ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental Processes ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Psychological ; Older people ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Journal of health communication, 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2011</rights><rights>Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24746236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graumlich, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><title>Journal of health communication</title><addtitle>J Health Commun</addtitle><description>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</description><subject>Adult literacy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Literacy</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - psychology</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>1081-0730</issn><issn>1087-0415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwDxCykBCrDH4lsVmAqlGhiKlgMV1bjnPTceXYUzvpKP-ehJkpjwVsbOve71yd65NlLwleECzwu-kguGJ4QTEhixLzCtNH2elUrnLMSfH455vkM3OSPUvpFmPCKJVPsxNKZEFowU-ztN4A-h6DgZTyrz7sHDQ3gK5CAw6FFl2Cdv0GrWwPUZvxPbq4tw14A6iNoUMaLUO3DR58b7VD5167Mdk0K9e7MDe74N2IrhM06Ap0GiKk59mTVrsELw73WXb96WK9vMxX3z5_WZ6vclMUtM9LUzaC1qIuTSG1rDkXDHPNKQgpjWg4IbhgstVCckFLLnHV1rqoW8zACMnYWfZhP3c71B00ZjIZtVPbaDsdRxW0VX92vN2om3CvGCOYleU04O1hQAx3A6RedTYZcE57CENSEmPGi4r_nxSyZJJRPJt6_Rd5G4Y4_dsMFaIUglUTxPeQiSGlCO2DaYLVnL46pq_m9NU-_Un26veFH0THuCfgzQHQyWjXRu2NTb84Pu1C2bzOxz1nfRtip3chukb1enQhHkXsn1Z-AJNuyqA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Chin, Jessie</creator><creator>Morrow, Daniel G.</creator><creator>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creator><creator>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creator><creator>Graumlich, James F.</creator><creator>Murray, Michael D.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</title><author>Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult literacy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Literacy</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - psychology</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graumlich, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of health communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Jessie</au><au>Morrow, Daniel G.</au><au>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L.</au><au>Conner-Garcia, Thembi</au><au>Graumlich, James F.</au><au>Murray, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health communication</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Commun</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>sup3</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>222-241</pages><issn>1081-0730</issn><eissn>1087-0415</eissn><abstract>We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>21951254</pmid><doi>10.1080/10810730.2011.604702</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1081-0730 |
ispartof | Journal of health communication, 2011-01, Vol.16 (sup3), p.222-241 |
issn | 1081-0730 1087-0415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_24746236 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Adult literacy Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cognition Educational Measurement - methods Female Health care Health education Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Literacy Health policy Health technology assessment Humans Hypertension Hypertension - psychology Information Knowledge Male Medical sciences Memory, Short-Term Mental Processes Middle Aged Miscellaneous Models, Psychological Older people Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Vocabulary |
title | The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Process-Knowledge%20Model%20of%20Health%20Literacy:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Componential%20Analysis%20of%20Two%20Commonly%20Used%20Measures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20communication&rft.au=Chin,%20Jessie&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=sup3&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=222-241&rft.issn=1081-0730&rft.eissn=1087-0415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10810730.2011.604702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E896393203%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-6c6d82b8b6c59a9b448304a42e899c8d4110539fa8948264907fba5bf03ec8933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=895868837&rft_id=info:pmid/21951254&rfr_iscdi=true |