Loading…

Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes

Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665
Main Authors: Place, G.T, Reberg-Horton, S.C, Carter, T.E, Brington, S.R, Smith, A.N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533
container_end_page 2665
container_issue 21
container_start_page 2654
container_title Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
container_volume 42
creator Place, G.T
Reberg-Horton, S.C
Carter, T.E
Brington, S.R
Smith, A.N
description Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00103624.2011.614040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_25362789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889272951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLAgXnbmNB9tr4YMnYOBF9uuQ5omo2NratIp_femdPNSrw45PM97wovQPeAJ4Aw_YwyY8IROEgww4UAxxRdoBIwkcUKBX6JRj8Q9c41uvN-FZ57iZISmK-W0rqt6G62laivlI2NdtCh13Vam6_cze2h0W7XVl45Wtiu0rKO5rm3bNdrfoisj917fneYYbd5e17P3ePkxX8xelrGiQNo4LRKW5iaHkpY05YRnrKC0BAkFC58quCwLbgqsTZophkGxMgfOC06zMieMkDF6HHIbZz-P2rdiZ4-uDicFJBnnGQDPA0UHSjnrvdNGNK46SNcJwKKvSpyrEn1VYqgqaE-ncOmV3Bsna1X5XzdhwUizPn46cFUdSjrIb-v2pWhlt7fuLJF_Lj0MCUZaIbcuCJtVAGhPswzoXwTOOckx-QG4nIz1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1286681169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><description>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2011.614040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass ; breeding ; canopy ; Competition ; Crop competitiveness ; crop production ; crop-weed competition ; cultivars ; farmers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; image analysis ; organic crop breeding ; Photography ; screening ; Soil sciences ; Soybeans ; weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25362789$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, T.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brington, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><title>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</title><description>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>breeding</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crop competitiveness</subject><subject>crop production</subject><subject>crop-weed competition</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>organic crop breeding</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-4133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLAgXnbmNB9tr4YMnYOBF9uuQ5omo2NratIp_femdPNSrw45PM97wovQPeAJ4Aw_YwyY8IROEgww4UAxxRdoBIwkcUKBX6JRj8Q9c41uvN-FZ57iZISmK-W0rqt6G62laivlI2NdtCh13Vam6_cze2h0W7XVl45Wtiu0rKO5rm3bNdrfoisj917fneYYbd5e17P3ePkxX8xelrGiQNo4LRKW5iaHkpY05YRnrKC0BAkFC58quCwLbgqsTZophkGxMgfOC06zMieMkDF6HHIbZz-P2rdiZ4-uDicFJBnnGQDPA0UHSjnrvdNGNK46SNcJwKKvSpyrEn1VYqgqaE-ncOmV3Bsna1X5XzdhwUizPn46cFUdSjrIb-v2pWhlt7fuLJF_Lj0MCUZaIbcuCJtVAGhPswzoXwTOOckx-QG4nIz1</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Place, G.T</creator><creator>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creator><creator>Carter, T.E</creator><creator>Brington, S.R</creator><creator>Smith, A.N</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><author>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>breeding</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crop competitiveness</topic><topic>crop production</topic><topic>crop-weed competition</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>organic crop breeding</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, T.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brington, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Place, G.T</au><au>Reberg-Horton, S.C</au><au>Carter, T.E</au><au>Brington, S.R</au><au>Smith, A.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2654</spage><epage>2665</epage><pages>2654-2665</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><eissn>1532-4133</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00103624.2011.614040</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-3624
ispartof Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665
issn 0010-3624
1532-2416
1532-2416
1532-4133
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_25362789
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
biomass
breeding
canopy
Competition
Crop competitiveness
crop production
crop-weed competition
cultivars
farmers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genotype
image analysis
organic crop breeding
Photography
screening
Soil sciences
Soybeans
weed control
Weeds
title Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20Tactics%20for%20Identifying%20Competitive%20Soybean%20Genotypes&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20Soil%20Science%20and%20Plant%20Analysis&rft.au=Place,%20G.T&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2654&rft.epage=2665&rft.pages=2654-2665&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103624.2011.614040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2889272951%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1286681169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true