Loading…
Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes
Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008...
Saved in:
Published in: | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533 |
container_end_page | 2665 |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 2654 |
container_title | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Place, G.T Reberg-Horton, S.C Carter, T.E Brington, S.R Smith, A.N |
description | Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00103624.2011.614040 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_25362789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889272951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLAgXnbmNB9tr4YMnYOBF9uuQ5omo2NratIp_femdPNSrw45PM97wovQPeAJ4Aw_YwyY8IROEgww4UAxxRdoBIwkcUKBX6JRj8Q9c41uvN-FZ57iZISmK-W0rqt6G62laivlI2NdtCh13Vam6_cze2h0W7XVl45Wtiu0rKO5rm3bNdrfoisj917fneYYbd5e17P3ePkxX8xelrGiQNo4LRKW5iaHkpY05YRnrKC0BAkFC58quCwLbgqsTZophkGxMgfOC06zMieMkDF6HHIbZz-P2rdiZ4-uDicFJBnnGQDPA0UHSjnrvdNGNK46SNcJwKKvSpyrEn1VYqgqaE-ncOmV3Bsna1X5XzdhwUizPn46cFUdSjrIb-v2pWhlt7fuLJF_Lj0MCUZaIbcuCJtVAGhPswzoXwTOOckx-QG4nIz1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1286681169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><description>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-3624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2011.614040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSOSA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass ; breeding ; canopy ; Competition ; Crop competitiveness ; crop production ; crop-weed competition ; cultivars ; farmers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; image analysis ; organic crop breeding ; Photography ; screening ; Soil sciences ; Soybeans ; weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25362789$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, T.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brington, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><title>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</title><description>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>breeding</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crop competitiveness</subject><subject>crop production</subject><subject>crop-weed competition</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>organic crop breeding</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><issn>1532-4133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_QLAgXnbmNB9tr4YMnYOBF9uuQ5omo2NratIp_femdPNSrw45PM97wovQPeAJ4Aw_YwyY8IROEgww4UAxxRdoBIwkcUKBX6JRj8Q9c41uvN-FZ57iZISmK-W0rqt6G62laivlI2NdtCh13Vam6_cze2h0W7XVl45Wtiu0rKO5rm3bNdrfoisj917fneYYbd5e17P3ePkxX8xelrGiQNo4LRKW5iaHkpY05YRnrKC0BAkFC58quCwLbgqsTZophkGxMgfOC06zMieMkDF6HHIbZz-P2rdiZ4-uDicFJBnnGQDPA0UHSjnrvdNGNK46SNcJwKKvSpyrEn1VYqgqaE-ncOmV3Bsna1X5XzdhwUizPn46cFUdSjrIb-v2pWhlt7fuLJF_Lj0MCUZaIbcuCJtVAGhPswzoXwTOOckx-QG4nIz1</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Place, G.T</creator><creator>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creator><creator>Carter, T.E</creator><creator>Brington, S.R</creator><creator>Smith, A.N</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</title><author>Place, G.T ; Reberg-Horton, S.C ; Carter, T.E ; Brington, S.R ; Smith, A.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>breeding</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crop competitiveness</topic><topic>crop production</topic><topic>crop-weed competition</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>organic crop breeding</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Place, G.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, T.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brington, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A.N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Place, G.T</au><au>Reberg-Horton, S.C</au><au>Carter, T.E</au><au>Brington, S.R</au><au>Smith, A.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2654</spage><epage>2665</epage><pages>2654-2665</pages><issn>0010-3624</issn><issn>1532-2416</issn><eissn>1532-2416</eissn><eissn>1532-4133</eissn><coden>CSOSA2</coden><abstract>Weed control is the biggest obstacle for farmers transitioning to organic soybean production. The breeding of competitive cultivars may provide organic soybean producers with another weed-management tactic. Soybean breeders need screening protocols to identify competitive genotypes. In 2007 and 2008, we tested two screening tactics to nondestructively estimate canopy coverage during the critical period for weed competition. Overhead photography at 3 and 5 weeks after emergence and light interception measurements at 4 and 6 weeks after emergence were compared in their ability to predict soybean and weed biomass at the end of the critical period for weed competition. Photographic digital image processing techniques were compared. Overhead photography at 5 weeks after emergence was most effective at predicting weed-free soybean biomass but overhead photography at 3 weeks after emergence was best able to predict weed biomass associated with soybean genotypes at the end of the critical period for weed competition.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00103624.2011.614040</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-3624 |
ispartof | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2011-01, Vol.42 (21), p.2654-2665 |
issn | 0010-3624 1532-2416 1532-2416 1532-4133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_25362789 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences biomass breeding canopy Competition Crop competitiveness crop production crop-weed competition cultivars farmers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genotype image analysis organic crop breeding Photography screening Soil sciences Soybeans weed control Weeds |
title | Screening Tactics for Identifying Competitive Soybean Genotypes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20Tactics%20for%20Identifying%20Competitive%20Soybean%20Genotypes&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20Soil%20Science%20and%20Plant%20Analysis&rft.au=Place,%20G.T&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2654&rft.epage=2665&rft.pages=2654-2665&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.coden=CSOSA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00103624.2011.614040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2889272951%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-7b2579f91d4d4763685b44d1a1b5624b6adb6fb0ef78c501c5d9166b648d93533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1286681169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |