Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians

Indicating that Colossians and Ephesians need a sustained study according to canonical-critical method, Porter-Clarke propose to define and apply to these two letters a workable model of what they have called a canonical-critical perspective. After study of canonical criticism today and of certain p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biblica 1997-01, Vol.78 (1), p.57-86
Main Authors: Porter, Stanley E., Clarke, Kent D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authorship attribution
Bible
Canonical criticism
Churches
Epistles
Exegesis and biblical criticism
History and sciences of religions
Letters testamentary
New Testament
Old Testament
Reconciliation
St Paul
Theology
Verbs
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Biblica
container_volume 78
creator Porter, Stanley E.
Clarke, Kent D.
description Indicating that Colossians and Ephesians need a sustained study according to canonical-critical method, Porter-Clarke propose to define and apply to these two letters a workable model of what they have called a canonical-critical perspective. After study of canonical criticism today and of certain problems this criticism faces, Porter-Clarke explain their choice of the word "perspective" and describe on going difficulties the method must meet. The canonical-critical perspective then studies three problems: the authorship of the letters, the prescript of Ephesians and the literary relationship between the two letters. There follows a relating of canonical to historical criticism.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_2883690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42613960</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42613960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j176t-42fe3f72bfd56a9cc95208c18559ede1477501d841fa2b4d8fee9b40f90295153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jktLxDAAhIMoWFd_gpCD10Lej6OU9QELK6LnJU0TmlKTkgTBf2_dlT3NDPMxzAVoCFW8JUiQS9AghESLlJLX4KaUaY2SUd2AfWdiisGaue1yqH8GvrlcFmdr-HbQxAHW0cF3N5saUixjWGDysEtzKiWYWI7IdhndMd2CK2_m4u7-dQM-n7Yf3Uu72z-_do-7dsJS1JYR76iXpPcDF0ZbqzlBymLFuXaDw0xKjvCgGPaG9GxQ3jndM-Q1IppjTjfg4bS7mLJ-9tlEG8phyeHL5J8DUYoKjVbs_oRNpaZ8rhkRmGqB6C99jVYN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Porter, Stanley E. ; Clarke, Kent D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E. ; Clarke, Kent D.</creatorcontrib><description>Indicating that Colossians and Ephesians need a sustained study according to canonical-critical method, Porter-Clarke propose to define and apply to these two letters a workable model of what they have called a canonical-critical perspective. After study of canonical criticism today and of certain problems this criticism faces, Porter-Clarke explain their choice of the word "perspective" and describe on going difficulties the method must meet. The canonical-critical perspective then studies three problems: the authorship of the letters, the prescript of Ephesians and the literary relationship between the two letters. There follows a relating of canonical to historical criticism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-0887</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2385-2062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Roma: Pontificio Instituto Biblico</publisher><subject>Authorship attribution ; Bible ; Canonical criticism ; Churches ; Epistles ; Exegesis and biblical criticism ; History and sciences of religions ; Letters testamentary ; New Testament ; Old Testament ; Reconciliation ; St Paul ; Theology ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Biblica, 1997-01, Vol.78 (1), p.57-86</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42613960$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42613960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2883690$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Kent D.</creatorcontrib><title>Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians</title><title>Biblica</title><description>Indicating that Colossians and Ephesians need a sustained study according to canonical-critical method, Porter-Clarke propose to define and apply to these two letters a workable model of what they have called a canonical-critical perspective. After study of canonical criticism today and of certain problems this criticism faces, Porter-Clarke explain their choice of the word "perspective" and describe on going difficulties the method must meet. The canonical-critical perspective then studies three problems: the authorship of the letters, the prescript of Ephesians and the literary relationship between the two letters. There follows a relating of canonical to historical criticism.</description><subject>Authorship attribution</subject><subject>Bible</subject><subject>Canonical criticism</subject><subject>Churches</subject><subject>Epistles</subject><subject>Exegesis and biblical criticism</subject><subject>History and sciences of religions</subject><subject>Letters testamentary</subject><subject>New Testament</subject><subject>Old Testament</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>St Paul</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0006-0887</issn><issn>2385-2062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jktLxDAAhIMoWFd_gpCD10Lej6OU9QELK6LnJU0TmlKTkgTBf2_dlT3NDPMxzAVoCFW8JUiQS9AghESLlJLX4KaUaY2SUd2AfWdiisGaue1yqH8GvrlcFmdr-HbQxAHW0cF3N5saUixjWGDysEtzKiWYWI7IdhndMd2CK2_m4u7-dQM-n7Yf3Uu72z-_do-7dsJS1JYR76iXpPcDF0ZbqzlBymLFuXaDw0xKjvCgGPaG9GxQ3jndM-Q1IppjTjfg4bS7mLJ-9tlEG8phyeHL5J8DUYoKjVbs_oRNpaZ8rhkRmGqB6C99jVYN</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Porter, Stanley E.</creator><creator>Clarke, Kent D.</creator><general>Pontificio Instituto Biblico</general><general>Pontificio istituto biblico</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians</title><author>Porter, Stanley E. ; Clarke, Kent D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j176t-42fe3f72bfd56a9cc95208c18559ede1477501d841fa2b4d8fee9b40f90295153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Authorship attribution</topic><topic>Bible</topic><topic>Canonical criticism</topic><topic>Churches</topic><topic>Epistles</topic><topic>Exegesis and biblical criticism</topic><topic>History and sciences of religions</topic><topic>Letters testamentary</topic><topic>New Testament</topic><topic>Old Testament</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>St Paul</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Kent D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Biblica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, Stanley E.</au><au>Clarke, Kent D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians</atitle><jtitle>Biblica</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>57-86</pages><issn>0006-0887</issn><eissn>2385-2062</eissn><abstract>Indicating that Colossians and Ephesians need a sustained study according to canonical-critical method, Porter-Clarke propose to define and apply to these two letters a workable model of what they have called a canonical-critical perspective. After study of canonical criticism today and of certain problems this criticism faces, Porter-Clarke explain their choice of the word "perspective" and describe on going difficulties the method must meet. The canonical-critical perspective then studies three problems: the authorship of the letters, the prescript of Ephesians and the literary relationship between the two letters. There follows a relating of canonical to historical criticism.</abstract><cop>Roma</cop><pub>Pontificio Instituto Biblico</pub><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-0887
ispartof Biblica, 1997-01, Vol.78 (1), p.57-86
issn 0006-0887
2385-2062
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_2883690
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Authorship attribution
Bible
Canonical criticism
Churches
Epistles
Exegesis and biblical criticism
History and sciences of religions
Letters testamentary
New Testament
Old Testament
Reconciliation
St Paul
Theology
Verbs
title Canonical-Critical Perspective and the Relationship of Colossians and Ephesians
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canonical-Critical%20Perspective%20and%20the%20Relationship%20of%20Colossians%20and%20Ephesians&rft.jtitle=Biblica&rft.au=Porter,%20Stanley%20E.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=57-86&rft.issn=0006-0887&rft.eissn=2385-2062&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E42613960%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j176t-42fe3f72bfd56a9cc95208c18559ede1477501d841fa2b4d8fee9b40f90295153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42613960&rfr_iscdi=true