Loading…
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children
The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical neuropsychologist 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863 |
container_end_page | 1277 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1258 |
container_title | Clinical neuropsychologist |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Irwin, Julie K. Joschko, Michael Kerns, Kimberly A. |
description | The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's (
1993
) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,
1966
) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13854046.2014.975843 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29083518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1643147231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSNI0b1CKLoX04K1kSZZ9KsvStAuBQtKezViWGhVZSjVegt--Wna3veU0_-H7peEbQt5xtuKsZZ-4aJVkslnVjMtVp1UrxStyybWUleRSvi65INWeuSBvEH8zxhtZ63NyUSuhupqpS_Jrk6LzeYI55YXegimTriOEBT3S5Oj8aOm9XWIKI9JtnG0I1sw7CHSNaBEnG2f6YCBYpDf32_XDR-oj3UCE0UMJjz6M2ca35MxBQHt9nFfk5-2XH5tv1d33r9vN-q4yshFzBcxpJY0bBuOE0EOtWtHIzg2mBWGU4iDAja5jWhsHSmvZNp0anHKqYSWLK3JzePcppz87i3M_eTRlaYg27bAvBgSXuha8oPKAmpwQs3X9U_YT5KXnrN8r7k-K-73i_qC41N4ff9gNkx3_lU5OC_DhCAAWLy5DNB7_cx1rheJt4T4fOB9dKhd4TjmM_QxLSPlUEi-u8hfly5dc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1643147231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's (
1993
) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,
1966
) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-4144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2014.975843</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25359205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Routledge</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Canadian ; Child ; Children ; Developmental psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Intelligence test ; Intelligence Tests ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Validity ; Wechsler Scales</subject><ispartof>Clinical neuropsychologist, 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29083518$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25359205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joschko, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><title>Clinical neuropsychologist</title><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's (
1993
) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,
1966
) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Canadian</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence test</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales</subject><issn>1385-4046</issn><issn>1744-4144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSNI0b1CKLoX04K1kSZZ9KsvStAuBQtKezViWGhVZSjVegt--Wna3veU0_-H7peEbQt5xtuKsZZ-4aJVkslnVjMtVp1UrxStyybWUleRSvi65INWeuSBvEH8zxhtZ63NyUSuhupqpS_Jrk6LzeYI55YXegimTriOEBT3S5Oj8aOm9XWIKI9JtnG0I1sw7CHSNaBEnG2f6YCBYpDf32_XDR-oj3UCE0UMJjz6M2ca35MxBQHt9nFfk5-2XH5tv1d33r9vN-q4yshFzBcxpJY0bBuOE0EOtWtHIzg2mBWGU4iDAja5jWhsHSmvZNp0anHKqYSWLK3JzePcppz87i3M_eTRlaYg27bAvBgSXuha8oPKAmpwQs3X9U_YT5KXnrN8r7k-K-73i_qC41N4ff9gNkx3_lU5OC_DhCAAWLy5DNB7_cx1rheJt4T4fOB9dKhd4TjmM_QxLSPlUEi-u8hfly5dc</recordid><startdate>20141117</startdate><enddate>20141117</enddate><creator>Irwin, Julie K.</creator><creator>Joschko, Michael</creator><creator>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141117</creationdate><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><author>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Canadian</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence test</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joschko, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irwin, Julie K.</au><au>Joschko, Michael</au><au>Kerns, Kimberly A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2014-11-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1258</spage><epage>1277</epage><pages>1258-1277</pages><issn>1385-4046</issn><eissn>1744-4144</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's (
1993
) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,
1966
) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>25359205</pmid><doi>10.1080/13854046.2014.975843</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-4046 |
ispartof | Clinical neuropsychologist, 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277 |
issn | 1385-4046 1744-4144 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29083518 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Canada Canadian Child Children Developmental psychology Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Intelligence Intelligence test Intelligence Tests Male Neuropsychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics Validity Wechsler Scales |
title | Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T09%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confirmatory%20Factor%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Reynolds%20Intellectual%20Assessment%20Scales%20(RIAS)%20in%20Canadian%20Children&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neuropsychologist&rft.au=Irwin,%20Julie%20K.&rft.date=2014-11-17&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1258&rft.epage=1277&rft.pages=1258-1277&rft.issn=1385-4046&rft.eissn=1744-4144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13854046.2014.975843&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1643147231%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1643147231&rft_id=info:pmid/25359205&rfr_iscdi=true |