Loading…

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children

The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neuropsychologist 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277
Main Authors: Irwin, Julie K., Joschko, Michael, Kerns, Kimberly A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863
container_end_page 1277
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1258
container_title Clinical neuropsychologist
container_volume 28
creator Irwin, Julie K.
Joschko, Michael
Kerns, Kimberly A.
description The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn & Cattell, 1966 ) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13854046.2014.975843
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29083518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1643147231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSNI0b1CKLoX04K1kSZZ9KsvStAuBQtKezViWGhVZSjVegt--Wna3veU0_-H7peEbQt5xtuKsZZ-4aJVkslnVjMtVp1UrxStyybWUleRSvi65INWeuSBvEH8zxhtZ63NyUSuhupqpS_Jrk6LzeYI55YXegimTriOEBT3S5Oj8aOm9XWIKI9JtnG0I1sw7CHSNaBEnG2f6YCBYpDf32_XDR-oj3UCE0UMJjz6M2ca35MxBQHt9nFfk5-2XH5tv1d33r9vN-q4yshFzBcxpJY0bBuOE0EOtWtHIzg2mBWGU4iDAja5jWhsHSmvZNp0anHKqYSWLK3JzePcppz87i3M_eTRlaYg27bAvBgSXuha8oPKAmpwQs3X9U_YT5KXnrN8r7k-K-73i_qC41N4ff9gNkx3_lU5OC_DhCAAWLy5DNB7_cx1rheJt4T4fOB9dKhd4TjmM_QxLSPlUEi-u8hfly5dc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1643147231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn &amp; Cattell, 1966 ) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-4144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2014.975843</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25359205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Routledge</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Canadian ; Child ; Children ; Developmental psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Intelligence test ; Intelligence Tests ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Validity ; Wechsler Scales</subject><ispartof>Clinical neuropsychologist, 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29083518$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25359205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joschko, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><title>Clinical neuropsychologist</title><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn &amp; Cattell, 1966 ) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Canadian</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence test</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales</subject><issn>1385-4046</issn><issn>1744-4144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpSNI0b1CKLoX04K1kSZZ9KsvStAuBQtKezViWGhVZSjVegt--Wna3veU0_-H7peEbQt5xtuKsZZ-4aJVkslnVjMtVp1UrxStyybWUleRSvi65INWeuSBvEH8zxhtZ63NyUSuhupqpS_Jrk6LzeYI55YXegimTriOEBT3S5Oj8aOm9XWIKI9JtnG0I1sw7CHSNaBEnG2f6YCBYpDf32_XDR-oj3UCE0UMJjz6M2ca35MxBQHt9nFfk5-2XH5tv1d33r9vN-q4yshFzBcxpJY0bBuOE0EOtWtHIzg2mBWGU4iDAja5jWhsHSmvZNp0anHKqYSWLK3JzePcppz87i3M_eTRlaYg27bAvBgSXuha8oPKAmpwQs3X9U_YT5KXnrN8r7k-K-73i_qC41N4ff9gNkx3_lU5OC_DhCAAWLy5DNB7_cx1rheJt4T4fOB9dKhd4TjmM_QxLSPlUEi-u8hfly5dc</recordid><startdate>20141117</startdate><enddate>20141117</enddate><creator>Irwin, Julie K.</creator><creator>Joschko, Michael</creator><creator>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141117</creationdate><title>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</title><author>Irwin, Julie K. ; Joschko, Michael ; Kerns, Kimberly A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Canadian</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence test</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Julie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joschko, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerns, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irwin, Julie K.</au><au>Joschko, Michael</au><au>Kerns, Kimberly A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neuropsychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2014-11-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1258</spage><epage>1277</epage><pages>1258-1277</pages><issn>1385-4046</issn><eissn>1744-4144</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the current study was to assess the validity of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scale's (RIAS) index and subtest scores by examining whether the RIAS conforms to Carroll's ( 1993 ) three-stratum theory of cognitive ability and the Cattell-Horn Gf-Gc (Horn &amp; Cattell, 1966 ) theory of intelligence upon which it was based. Factor structures of RIAS scores from typically developing (n = 187) and mixed clinical groups (n = 164), 4-18 years old, were compared using confirmatory factor analysis. The results were mixed, with some findings supporting the validity of the Composite Intelligence Index (CIX), Nonverbal Intelligence Index (NIX), and Verbal Intelligence Index (VIX) while others suggested that the CIX and NIX in particular should be interpreted with caution, depending on the population in which the RIAS is being used. The functioning of the two nonverbal subtests in all analyses suggested that the RIAS's nonverbal subtests are most problematic, with the greatest impact on the RIAS's validity as a measure of overall, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence. The RIAS's use as a general cognitive screener is supported but caution is recommended if the RIAS is being used to make important diagnostic, qualification for services, forensic, or placement decisions.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>25359205</pmid><doi>10.1080/13854046.2014.975843</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-4046
ispartof Clinical neuropsychologist, 2014-11, Vol.28 (8), p.1258-1277
issn 1385-4046
1744-4144
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_29083518
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Canada
Canadian
Child
Children
Developmental psychology
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Intelligence
Intelligence test
Intelligence Tests
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Validity
Wechsler Scales
title Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian Children
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T09%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confirmatory%20Factor%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Reynolds%20Intellectual%20Assessment%20Scales%20(RIAS)%20in%20Canadian%20Children&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neuropsychologist&rft.au=Irwin,%20Julie%20K.&rft.date=2014-11-17&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1258&rft.epage=1277&rft.pages=1258-1277&rft.issn=1385-4046&rft.eissn=1744-4144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13854046.2014.975843&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1643147231%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a0f754cfbbcf337b2583649fbc8a3c551a3afdf9077cfa57748695bf5f5604863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1643147231&rft_id=info:pmid/25359205&rfr_iscdi=true