Loading…

Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth

Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in soli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physics in medicine & biology 1996-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2067-2078
Main Authors: Ostwald, P M, Kron, T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43
container_end_page 2078
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2067
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 41
creator Ostwald, P M
Kron, T
description Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in solid water. ESSDs were calculated for electron beams in the energy range 4-20 MeV and were found to vary with depth. The surface ESSD varied from 68 cm for 4 MeV to 82 cm for 16 MeV, but increased with depth to a maximum value, which was found at approximately half the practical range (Rp), at 0.3Rp for 4 MeV and at 0.6Rp for 20 MeV. Beyond this depth the ESSD decreased towards the end of the practical range. Without an electron applicator, the ESSD was higher at the surface. For smaller field sizes, the depth of the maximum ESSD increased towards Rp, and ESSD values increased. The 20 MeV beam in the 6 cm x 6 cm2 field showed a difference of 31 cm between the surface ESSD and the maximum ESSD. The ESSD calculated at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) may be used with reasonable accuracy for calculation of the dose in the therapeutic range, except at larger SSDs or when high-energy beams are used in small fields Depth-dose distributions under these conditions should be compared with measured results.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/41/10/015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_3226478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78525473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVoSN20vyAE9lB6KGys0cdKeywmdQOGXNJehSyNiMLau5V2E_Lvo8XGl_RQdJCYed4Z8RByBfQGqNZLSjnULUi5FLAEuqQgz8gCeAN1Ixv6gSxOxEfyKecnSgE0ExfkQrfAuIYFWf-xKdox9vsq7itnOzd1dkRfYQjoxviMVe6n5LCqqzylYMvLxzzavcNcvcTxsfI4jI-fyXmwXcYvx_uS_P55-7D6VW_u13erH5vaCcrH2jXogKFC2YRWgSt_88zaRomtl0JqRjEAMrl1WI72jVLYom-VZNy3VvBL8u0wd0j93wnzaHYxO-w6u8d-ykZpyaRQvID8ALrU55wwmCHFnU2vBqiZ9ZlZjpnlGAFzsegrqevj-Gm7Q3_KHH2V_tdj3-YiK6TiIeYTxhlrhNIFuzlgsR_-c-_394F_gGbwgb8BkACSEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78525473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><source>Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Journal Archive 1874-1998 (access period 2020 to 2024)</source><creator>Ostwald, P M ; Kron, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Ostwald, P M ; Kron, T</creatorcontrib><description>Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in solid water. ESSDs were calculated for electron beams in the energy range 4-20 MeV and were found to vary with depth. The surface ESSD varied from 68 cm for 4 MeV to 82 cm for 16 MeV, but increased with depth to a maximum value, which was found at approximately half the practical range (Rp), at 0.3Rp for 4 MeV and at 0.6Rp for 20 MeV. Beyond this depth the ESSD decreased towards the end of the practical range. Without an electron applicator, the ESSD was higher at the surface. For smaller field sizes, the depth of the maximum ESSD increased towards Rp, and ESSD values increased. The 20 MeV beam in the 6 cm x 6 cm2 field showed a difference of 31 cm between the surface ESSD and the maximum ESSD. The ESSD calculated at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) may be used with reasonable accuracy for calculation of the dose in the therapeutic range, except at larger SSDs or when high-energy beams are used in small fields Depth-dose distributions under these conditions should be compared with measured results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/10/015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8912381</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Electrons ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Models, Theoretical ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 1996-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2067-2078</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/41/10/015/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53950</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3226478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ostwald, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kron, T</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in solid water. ESSDs were calculated for electron beams in the energy range 4-20 MeV and were found to vary with depth. The surface ESSD varied from 68 cm for 4 MeV to 82 cm for 16 MeV, but increased with depth to a maximum value, which was found at approximately half the practical range (Rp), at 0.3Rp for 4 MeV and at 0.6Rp for 20 MeV. Beyond this depth the ESSD decreased towards the end of the practical range. Without an electron applicator, the ESSD was higher at the surface. For smaller field sizes, the depth of the maximum ESSD increased towards Rp, and ESSD values increased. The 20 MeV beam in the 6 cm x 6 cm2 field showed a difference of 31 cm between the surface ESSD and the maximum ESSD. The ESSD calculated at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) may be used with reasonable accuracy for calculation of the dose in the therapeutic range, except at larger SSDs or when high-energy beams are used in small fields Depth-dose distributions under these conditions should be compared with measured results.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVoSN20vyAE9lB6KGys0cdKeywmdQOGXNJehSyNiMLau5V2E_Lvo8XGl_RQdJCYed4Z8RByBfQGqNZLSjnULUi5FLAEuqQgz8gCeAN1Ixv6gSxOxEfyKecnSgE0ExfkQrfAuIYFWf-xKdox9vsq7itnOzd1dkRfYQjoxviMVe6n5LCqqzylYMvLxzzavcNcvcTxsfI4jI-fyXmwXcYvx_uS_P55-7D6VW_u13erH5vaCcrH2jXogKFC2YRWgSt_88zaRomtl0JqRjEAMrl1WI72jVLYom-VZNy3VvBL8u0wd0j93wnzaHYxO-w6u8d-ykZpyaRQvID8ALrU55wwmCHFnU2vBqiZ9ZlZjpnlGAFzsegrqevj-Gm7Q3_KHH2V_tdj3-YiK6TiIeYTxhlrhNIFuzlgsR_-c-_394F_gGbwgb8BkACSEQ</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Ostwald, P M</creator><creator>Kron, T</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth</title><author>Ostwald, P M ; Kron, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ostwald, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kron, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ostwald, P M</au><au>Kron, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2067</spage><epage>2078</epage><pages>2067-2078</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Effective source-surface distances (ESSD) are assessed at the depth of maximum dose in electron beams. This study investigated the variation of the ESSD with the depth of measurement. The dose was measured with the range of SSDs 100-130 cm, using a water-equivalent parallel-plate ion chamber in solid water. ESSDs were calculated for electron beams in the energy range 4-20 MeV and were found to vary with depth. The surface ESSD varied from 68 cm for 4 MeV to 82 cm for 16 MeV, but increased with depth to a maximum value, which was found at approximately half the practical range (Rp), at 0.3Rp for 4 MeV and at 0.6Rp for 20 MeV. Beyond this depth the ESSD decreased towards the end of the practical range. Without an electron applicator, the ESSD was higher at the surface. For smaller field sizes, the depth of the maximum ESSD increased towards Rp, and ESSD values increased. The 20 MeV beam in the 6 cm x 6 cm2 field showed a difference of 31 cm between the surface ESSD and the maximum ESSD. The ESSD calculated at the maximum dose depth (Dmax) may be used with reasonable accuracy for calculation of the dose in the therapeutic range, except at larger SSDs or when high-energy beams are used in small fields Depth-dose distributions under these conditions should be compared with measured results.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>8912381</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/41/10/015</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 1996-10, Vol.41 (10), p.2067-2078
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_3226478
source Institute of Physics; Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Journal Archive 1874-1998 (access period 2020 to 2024)
subjects Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Electrons
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Models, Theoretical
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title Variation in calculated effective source - surface distances with depth
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A53%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20calculated%20effective%20source%20-%20surface%20distances%20with%20depth&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Ostwald,%20P%20M&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2067&rft.epage=2078&rft.pages=2067-2078&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/41/10/015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E78525473%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-c6ec12e7e56f971c915d2aa674bd545820ef1e25bcecec8d677e9ed97523d9a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78525473&rft_id=info:pmid/8912381&rfr_iscdi=true