Loading…
Why Some Forms of Induction Are Better Than Others at Encouraging Prosocial Behavior
To examine the effects of different forms of induction on children's prosocial behavior, predictions were derived from self-perception theory and evaluated regarding the cognitive component of the induction and the manipulation of choice. The affective valence of inductive appeals also was exam...
Saved in:
Published in: | Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1995-07, Vol.41 (3), p.347-360 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To examine the effects of different forms of induction on children's prosocial behavior, predictions were derived from self-perception theory and evaluated regarding the cognitive component of the induction and the manipulation of choice. The affective valence of inductive appeals also was examined. Boys and girls (n = 80) at ages 7 and 8 years were randomly assigned to a 2 (Adult or Peer Beneficiary, as focus of induction) × 2 (Low or High Choice) × 2 (Positive or Negative Affect) factorial design. Beneficiary-oriented induction produced more internalized prosocial behavior than did adult-oriented induction under conditions of high choice. Affectively positive appeals were more effective than negative appeals across conditions. The findings, which were consistent with self-perception theory, help clarify when induction encourages internalized prosocial behavior. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-930X 1535-0266 |