Loading…

The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis

The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were examined. Computer-simulated data sets were generated to represent a range of factor and component patterns. Saturation (a ij =...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Multivariate behavioral research 1992-07, Vol.27 (3), p.387-415
Main Authors: Fava, Joseph L., Velicer, Wayne F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123
container_end_page 415
container_issue 3
container_start_page 387
container_title Multivariate behavioral research
container_volume 27
creator Fava, Joseph L.
Velicer, Wayne F.
description The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were examined. Computer-simulated data sets were generated to represent a range of factor and component patterns. Saturation (a ij = .8, .6 & .4), sample size (N = 75, 150,225,450), and variable-to-component (factor) ratio (p:m = 12:1,6:1, & 4:1) were conditions manipulated. In Study 1, scores based on the incorrect patterns were correlated with correct scores within each method after each overextraction. In Study 2, scores were correlated between the methods of PCAand MLFA after each overextraction. Overextraction had a negative effect, but scores based on strong component and factor patterns displayed robustness to the effects of overextraction. Low item saturation and low sample size resulted in degraded score reproduction. Degradation was strongest for patterns that combined low saturation and low sample size. Component and factor scores were highly correlated even at maximal levels of overextraction. Dissimilarity between score methods was the greatest in conditions that combined low saturation and low sample size. Some guidelines for researchers concerning the effects of overextraction are noted, as well as some cautions in the interpretation of results.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_4524480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ460550</ericid><sourcerecordid>1760890018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6B0SkBw9eqpO0SZqDwrLs-sHCXtZzSdMUK22yJl11_70p-3ERhIEZ5n3mZXgRusRwhwnwe49pQrgA1haOcEhyeoSG_S7ul8doCEB4nGCOB-jM-w8AYDQVp2hAGM9EqCF6XL7raFpVWnU-slW0-NJO_3ROqq62Jgo1C6N1kTRlNLHtyhptumhsZLPxtT9HJ5VsvL7Y9RF6m02Xk-d4vnh6mYznsUqBdrHiNBO0EkVWUJVhVoKQlBYFSzFJBMOCFpyUGDgIxYkUqqASJCVK4TAEZoRut74rZz_X2nd5W3ulm0Yabdc-x5xBJgBwFlCyRZWz3jtd5StXt9Jtcgx5n1v-N7dwdL3zXxetLg8n-6ACcLMDpFeyqZw0qvYHLqUkTTMI2NUW065WB3X6mjKgtJcftnJtKuta-W1dU-ad3DTW7S2Tf978BRL9kfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760890018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Fava, Joseph L. ; Velicer, Wayne F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fava, Joseph L. ; Velicer, Wayne F.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were examined. Computer-simulated data sets were generated to represent a range of factor and component patterns. Saturation (a ij = .8, .6 &amp; .4), sample size (N = 75, 150,225,450), and variable-to-component (factor) ratio (p:m = 12:1,6:1, &amp; 4:1) were conditions manipulated. In Study 1, scores based on the incorrect patterns were correlated with correct scores within each method after each overextraction. In Study 2, scores were correlated between the methods of PCAand MLFA after each overextraction. Overextraction had a negative effect, but scores based on strong component and factor patterns displayed robustness to the effects of overextraction. Low item saturation and low sample size resulted in degraded score reproduction. Degradation was strongest for patterns that combined low saturation and low sample size. Component and factor scores were highly correlated even at maximal levels of overextraction. Dissimilarity between score methods was the greatest in conditions that combined low saturation and low sample size. Some guidelines for researchers concerning the effects of overextraction are noted, as well as some cautions in the interpretation of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-3171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26789789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MVBRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Worth, TX: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Correlation ; Factor Analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mathematical Models ; Maximum Likelihood Statistics ; Overextraction ; Principal Components Analysis ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology ; Sample Size ; Scores ; Specification Error ; Statistics. Mathematics</subject><ispartof>Multivariate behavioral research, 1992-07, Vol.27 (3), p.387-415</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59779,60568</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ460550$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4524480$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26789789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fava, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velicer, Wayne F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis</title><title>Multivariate behavioral research</title><addtitle>Multivariate Behav Res</addtitle><description>The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were examined. Computer-simulated data sets were generated to represent a range of factor and component patterns. Saturation (a ij = .8, .6 &amp; .4), sample size (N = 75, 150,225,450), and variable-to-component (factor) ratio (p:m = 12:1,6:1, &amp; 4:1) were conditions manipulated. In Study 1, scores based on the incorrect patterns were correlated with correct scores within each method after each overextraction. In Study 2, scores were correlated between the methods of PCAand MLFA after each overextraction. Overextraction had a negative effect, but scores based on strong component and factor patterns displayed robustness to the effects of overextraction. Low item saturation and low sample size resulted in degraded score reproduction. Degradation was strongest for patterns that combined low saturation and low sample size. Component and factor scores were highly correlated even at maximal levels of overextraction. Dissimilarity between score methods was the greatest in conditions that combined low saturation and low sample size. Some guidelines for researchers concerning the effects of overextraction are noted, as well as some cautions in the interpretation of results.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mathematical Models</subject><subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</subject><subject>Overextraction</subject><subject>Principal Components Analysis</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Specification Error</subject><subject>Statistics. Mathematics</subject><issn>0027-3171</issn><issn>1532-7906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6B0SkBw9eqpO0SZqDwrLs-sHCXtZzSdMUK22yJl11_70p-3ERhIEZ5n3mZXgRusRwhwnwe49pQrgA1haOcEhyeoSG_S7ul8doCEB4nGCOB-jM-w8AYDQVp2hAGM9EqCF6XL7raFpVWnU-slW0-NJO_3ROqq62Jgo1C6N1kTRlNLHtyhptumhsZLPxtT9HJ5VsvL7Y9RF6m02Xk-d4vnh6mYznsUqBdrHiNBO0EkVWUJVhVoKQlBYFSzFJBMOCFpyUGDgIxYkUqqASJCVK4TAEZoRut74rZz_X2nd5W3ulm0Yabdc-x5xBJgBwFlCyRZWz3jtd5StXt9Jtcgx5n1v-N7dwdL3zXxetLg8n-6ACcLMDpFeyqZw0qvYHLqUkTTMI2NUW065WB3X6mjKgtJcftnJtKuta-W1dU-ad3DTW7S2Tf978BRL9kfQ</recordid><startdate>19920701</startdate><enddate>19920701</enddate><creator>Fava, Joseph L.</creator><creator>Velicer, Wayne F.</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920701</creationdate><title>The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis</title><author>Fava, Joseph L. ; Velicer, Wayne F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mathematical Models</topic><topic>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</topic><topic>Overextraction</topic><topic>Principal Components Analysis</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Specification Error</topic><topic>Statistics. Mathematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fava, Joseph L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velicer, Wayne F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Multivariate behavioral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fava, Joseph L.</au><au>Velicer, Wayne F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ460550</ericid><atitle>The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Multivariate behavioral research</jtitle><addtitle>Multivariate Behav Res</addtitle><date>1992-07-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>387-415</pages><issn>0027-3171</issn><eissn>1532-7906</eissn><coden>MVBRAV</coden><abstract>The effects of overextracting factors and components within and between the methods of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were examined. Computer-simulated data sets were generated to represent a range of factor and component patterns. Saturation (a ij = .8, .6 &amp; .4), sample size (N = 75, 150,225,450), and variable-to-component (factor) ratio (p:m = 12:1,6:1, &amp; 4:1) were conditions manipulated. In Study 1, scores based on the incorrect patterns were correlated with correct scores within each method after each overextraction. In Study 2, scores were correlated between the methods of PCAand MLFA after each overextraction. Overextraction had a negative effect, but scores based on strong component and factor patterns displayed robustness to the effects of overextraction. Low item saturation and low sample size resulted in degraded score reproduction. Degradation was strongest for patterns that combined low saturation and low sample size. Component and factor scores were highly correlated even at maximal levels of overextraction. Dissimilarity between score methods was the greatest in conditions that combined low saturation and low sample size. Some guidelines for researchers concerning the effects of overextraction are noted, as well as some cautions in the interpretation of results.</abstract><cop>Fort Worth, TX</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><pmid>26789789</pmid><doi>10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-3171
ispartof Multivariate behavioral research, 1992-07, Vol.27 (3), p.387-415
issn 0027-3171
1532-7906
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_4524480
source Taylor & Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015; ERIC
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Computer Simulation
Correlation
Factor Analysis
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Mathematical Models
Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Overextraction
Principal Components Analysis
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology
Sample Size
Scores
Specification Error
Statistics. Mathematics
title The Effects of Overextraction on Factor and Component Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Overextraction%20on%20Factor%20and%20Component%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Multivariate%20behavioral%20research&rft.au=Fava,%20Joseph%20L.&rft.date=1992-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=387-415&rft.issn=0027-3171&rft.eissn=1532-7906&rft.coden=MVBRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1760890018%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c75895f9b8b5c816d09a55bb6412396195b72d10709c72a9cb5a0a52cc15a0123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760890018&rft_id=info:pmid/26789789&rft_ericid=EJ460550&rfr_iscdi=true