The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale

Deci and Ryan's causality orientations theory suggests that there are individual differences in motivational orientation towards initiating and regulating behaviour. They described three causality orientations: autonomy, control and impersonal. The aim of this paper is to describe the developme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports sciences 2001-06, Vol.19 (6), p.445-462
Main Authors: Rose, Elaine A., Markland, David, Parfitt, Gaynor
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Causality
Causality Orientations
Chi-Square Distribution
Exercise
Exercise - psychology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Motivation
Multi-TRAIT Multi-METHOD Analysis
Power (Psychology)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Self Concept
Self-DETERMINATION
Social Desirability
Social Perception
Sports. Leisure
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Deci and Ryan's causality orientations theory suggests that there are individual differences in motivational orientation towards initiating and regulating behaviour. They described three causality orientations: autonomy, control and impersonal. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and concurrent validity of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale (ECOS), which was designed to measure the strength of these three orientations within exercise. Altogether, 592 working adults aged 35.0±11.4 years (mean±s ) completed the ECOS and measures of self-determination, self-consciousness and social desirability. The analysis was conducted in two parts. First, the data were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis using a multi-trait, multimethod framework. The original model resulted in a poor fit to the data. On the basis of its modification indices, three scenarios with ambiguous items were removed successively, resulting in a scale with good psychometric properties. Secondly, Pearson's correlations were conducted between the subscales of the ECOS and those of the questionnaires used for validation. Most of the results supported a priori hypotheses. In conclusion, our results show the ECOS to have good psychometric properties and they provide some support for its concurrent validity.
ISSN:0264-0414
1466-447X
DOI:10.1080/026404101300149393