Loading…

Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust

In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	PLoS medicine 2009-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e1000186-e1000186
Main Authors:	Lilford, Richard James, Foster, Jo, Pringle, Mike
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Design Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Information technology Medical Informatics - standards Non-Clinical Medicine/Communication in Health Care Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Policy Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Services Administration and Management Parameter estimation Public Health and Epidemiology Qualitative research Studies United Kingdom
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163
container_end_page	e1000186
container_issue	11
container_start_page	e1000186
container_title	PLoS medicine
container_volume	6
creator	Lilford, Richard James Foster, Jo Pringle, Mike
description	In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.
doi_str_mv	10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1288088591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_686d5044949140d9967461aa834a442c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>734169585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIPOAPIpgbp13s8TsHpCjKS4rEBc5Wj-3dnY1nvLE9i_L3OOwAyamt7uqqdhVCZwQvCZXk6zZOaYSw3A3eLQnGmCjxBh0TzvSCCCnevngfoZOctxi3Gmv8Hh0RrbkQkh2jm6s9hAlKP64bf-shlM15s4m_mhKbAR584-d5HJshJt8MvmyiiyGuewshPDUpdlMuH9C7FYTsP871FP28vvpxebu4_35zd3lxv7BMy7KQGCvgHXSed9Q5cJQJqsQK5MqR1nKwluJWdtxzV28lTHUEawkWhLWeCHqKPh94dyFmM3uQDWmVwkpxTSri7oBwEbZml_oB0pOJ0Js_jZjWBlLpbfBGKOE4ZkyzqoSd1tUSQQAUZcBYayvXt1lt6qrN1o8lQXhF-noy9huzjnvTSimpppXgy0yQ4uPkczFDn60PAUYfp2wkZURornhFsgPSpphz8qt_KgSb58D_ftY8B27mwOvap5cX_l-aE6a_AQ5KqkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734169585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><creator>Lilford, Richard James ; Foster, Jo ; Pringle, Mike</creator><contributor>Sheikh, Aziz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lilford, Richard James ; Foster, Jo ; Pringle, Mike ; Sheikh, Aziz</creatorcontrib><description>In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19956674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Design ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Information technology ; Medical Informatics - standards ; Non-Clinical Medicine/Communication in Health Care ; Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Policy ; Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Services Administration and Management ; Parameter estimation ; Public Health and Epidemiology ; Qualitative research ; Studies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2009-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e1000186-e1000186</ispartof><rights>Lilford et al. 2009</rights><rights>2009 Lilford et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Lilford RJ, Foster J, Pringle M (2009) Evaluating eHealth: How to Make Evaluation More Methodologically Robust. PLoS Med 6(11): e1000186. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777393/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777393/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sheikh, Aziz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lilford, Richard James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><description>In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Medical Informatics - standards</subject><subject>Non-Clinical Medicine/Communication in Health Care</subject><subject>Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Policy</subject><subject>Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Services Administration and Management</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Public Health and Epidemiology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIPOAPIpgbp13s8TsHpCjKS4rEBc5Wj-3dnY1nvLE9i_L3OOwAyamt7uqqdhVCZwQvCZXk6zZOaYSw3A3eLQnGmCjxBh0TzvSCCCnevngfoZOctxi3Gmv8Hh0RrbkQkh2jm6s9hAlKP64bf-shlM15s4m_mhKbAR584-d5HJshJt8MvmyiiyGuewshPDUpdlMuH9C7FYTsP871FP28vvpxebu4_35zd3lxv7BMy7KQGCvgHXSed9Q5cJQJqsQK5MqR1nKwluJWdtxzV28lTHUEawkWhLWeCHqKPh94dyFmM3uQDWmVwkpxTSri7oBwEbZml_oB0pOJ0Js_jZjWBlLpbfBGKOE4ZkyzqoSd1tUSQQAUZcBYayvXt1lt6qrN1o8lQXhF-noy9huzjnvTSimpppXgy0yQ4uPkczFDn60PAUYfp2wkZURornhFsgPSpphz8qt_KgSb58D_ftY8B27mwOvap5cX_l-aE6a_AQ5KqkY</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Lilford, Richard James</creator><creator>Foster, Jo</creator><creator>Pringle, Mike</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><scope>CZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust</title><author>Lilford, Richard James ; Foster, Jo ; Pringle, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Medical Informatics - standards</topic><topic>Non-Clinical Medicine/Communication in Health Care</topic><topic>Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Policy</topic><topic>Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Services Administration and Management</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Public Health and Epidemiology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lilford, Richard James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PLoS Medicine</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lilford, Richard James</au><au>Foster, Jo</au><au>Pringle, Mike</au><au>Sheikh, Aziz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Med</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e1000186</spage><epage>e1000186</epage><pages>e1000186-e1000186</pages><issn>1549-1676</issn><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>In the third in a series of articles on evaluating eHealth, Richard Lilford and colleagues consider the evaluation of health IT systems as they are rolled out following preimplementation testing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>19956674</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1549-1676
ispartof	PLoS medicine, 2009-11, Vol.6 (11), p.e1000186-e1000186
issn	1549-1676 1549-1277 1549-1676
language	eng
recordid	cdi_plos_journals_1288088591
source	Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (Open access)
subjects	Design Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Information technology Medical Informatics - standards Non-Clinical Medicine/Communication in Health Care Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Policy Non-Clinical Medicine/Health Services Administration and Management Parameter estimation Public Health and Epidemiology Qualitative research Studies United Kingdom
title	Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20eHealth:%20how%20to%20make%20evaluation%20more%20methodologically%20robust&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Lilford,%20Richard%20James&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e1000186&rft.epage=e1000186&rft.pages=e1000186-e1000186&rft.issn=1549-1676&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E734169585%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-7008a5babe5b3ddad346386fa7fd12c5acc3027b5e5d909148b1097aca6cce163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734169585&rft_id=info:pmid/19956674&rfr_iscdi=true