Nuisance ecology: do scavenging condors exact foraging costs on pumas in Patagonia?

• Published in: PloS one 2013-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e53595-e53595
• Main Authors: Elbroch, L Mark, Wittmer, Heiko U
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animals; Behavior; Biology; Birds; Carcasses; Chile; Cluster Analysis; Competition; Competitive Behavior; Conservation biology; Costs; Ecology; Endangered & extinct species; Energy intake; Feeding Behavior; Food; Forage; Forages; Foraging; Foraging behavior; Geographic Information Systems; Grasslands; Gymnogyps; Influence; Meat; Models, Theoretical; Predation; Predation (Biology); Predatory Behavior; Prey; Puma; Puma concolor; Pumas; Reinforcement; Researchers; Risk assessment; Risk factors; Risk taking; Vultur gryphus
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053595

Predation risk describes the energetic cost an animal suffers when making a trade off between maximizing energy intake and minimizing threats to its survival. We tested whether Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) influenced the foraging behaviors of a top predator in Patagonia, the puma (Puma concolor), in ways comparable to direct risks of predation for prey to address three questions: 1) Do condors exact a foraging cost on pumas?; 2) If so, do pumas exhibit behaviors indicative of these risks?; and 3) Do pumas display predictable behaviors associated with prey species foraging in risky environments? Using GPS location data, we located 433 kill sites of 9 pumas and quantified their kill rates. Based upon time pumas spent at a carcass, we quantified handling time. Pumas abandoned >10% of edible meat at 133 of 266 large carcasses after a single night, and did so most often in open grasslands where their carcasses were easily detected by condors. Our data suggested that condors exacted foraging costs on pumas by significantly decreasing puma handling times at carcasses, and that pumas increased their kill rates by 50% relative to those reported for North America to compensate for these losses. Finally, we determined that the relative risks of detection and associated harassment by condors, rather than prey densities, explained puma "giving up times" (GUTs) across structurally variable risk classes in the study area, and that, like many prey species, pumas disproportionately hunted in high-risk, high-resource reward areas.