Systematic evaluation of three microRNA profiling platforms: microarray, beads array, and quantitative real-time PCR array

• Published in: PloS one 2011-02, Vol.6 (2), p.e17167
• Main Authors: Wang, Bin, Howel, Paul, Bruheim, Skjalg, Ju, Jingfang, Owen, Laurie B, Fodstad, Oystein, Xi, Yaguang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analytical methods; Beads; Biocompatibility; Biology; Biomedical materials; Bone cancer; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Coefficient of variation; Data integration; Data processing; DNA microarrays; Gene expression; Gene Expression Profiling - methods; Genomics; Humans; Identification methods; Integration; Leukemia; Loess; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Medical research; Methods; MicroRNA; MicroRNAs; MicroRNAs - genetics; Microspheres; miRNA; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods; Oligonucleotides - genetics; Osteosarcoma; Osteosarcoma - genetics; Osteosarcoma - pathology; Platforms; Profiling; Real time; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods; Reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; Ribonucleic acid; RNA; Sensitivity analysis; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Xenografts
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017167

A number of gene-profiling methodologies have been applied to microRNA research. The diversity of the platforms and analytical methods makes the comparison and integration of cross-platform microRNA profiling data challenging. In this study, we systematically analyze three representative microRNA profiling platforms: Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) microarray, beads array, and TaqMan quantitative real-time PCR Low Density Array (TLDA). The microRNA profiles of 40 human osteosarcoma xenograft samples were generated by LNA array, beads array, and TLDA. Results show that each of the three platforms perform similarly regarding intra-platform reproducibility or reproducibility of data within one platform while LNA array and TLDA had the best inter-platform reproducibility or reproducibility of data across platforms. The endogenous controls/probes contained in each platform have been observed for their stability under different treatments/environments; those included in TLDA have the best performance with minimal coefficients of variation. Importantly, we identify that the proper selection of normalization methods is critical for improving the inter-platform reproducibility, which is evidenced by the application of two non-linear normalization methods (loess and quantile) that substantially elevated the sensitivity and specificity of the statistical data assessment. Each platform is relatively stable in terms of its own microRNA profiling intra-reproducibility; however, the inter-platform reproducibility among different platforms is low. More microRNA specific normalization methods are in demand for cross-platform microRNA microarray data integration and comparison, which will improve the reproducibility and consistency between platforms.