Loading…
Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search
Figures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has ma...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e12983-e12983 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-2857d17f6825bb5bfe25134f64631fb96fd450739a6f00c27c1f01db4b8e706c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | e12983 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e12983 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Yu, Hong Liu, Feifan Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli |
description | Figures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has made it difficult to access figures. Therefore, we are developing an intelligent figure search engine (http://figuresearch.askhermes.org). Existing research in figure search treats each figure equally, but we introduce a novel concept of "figure ranking": figures appearing in a full-text biomedical article can be ranked by their contribution to the knowledge discovery.
We empirically validated the hypothesis of figure ranking with over 100 bioscience researchers, and then developed unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approaches to automatically rank figures. Evaluating on a collection of 202 full-text articles in which authors have ranked the figures based on importance, our best system achieved a weighted error rate of 0.2, which is significantly better than several other baseline systems we explored. We further explored a user interfacing application in which we built novel user interfaces (UIs) incorporating figure ranking, allowing bioscience researchers to efficiently access important figures. Our evaluation results show that 92% of the bioscience researchers prefer as the top two choices the user interfaces in which the most important figures are enlarged. With our automatic figure ranking NLP system, bioscience researchers preferred the UIs in which the most important figures were predicted by our NLP system than the UIs in which the most important figures were randomly assigned. In addition, our results show that there was no statistical difference in bioscience researchers' preference in the UIs generated by automatic figure ranking and UIs by human ranking annotation.
The evaluation results conclude that automatic figure ranking and user interfacing as we reported in this study can be fully implemented in online publishing. The novel user interface integrated with the automatic figure ranking system provides a more efficient and robust way to access scientific information in the biomedical domain, which will further enhance our existing figure search engine to better facilitate accessing figures of interest for bioscientists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012983 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1292435914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A473855644</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a76d312d1688471fab7cb09f0c2b66ba</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A473855644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-2857d17f6825bb5bfe25134f64631fb96fd450739a6f00c27c1f01db4b8e706c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuL1DAUxoso7rr6H4gWBMWHGXNpLn0RhsXL4MKCt9eQpEknYycZk1b0vzfd6SxT2QfpQ9vT3_ednNOvKJ5CsISYwTfbMEQvu-U-eLMEAKKa43vFOawxWlAE8P2T57PiUUpbAAjmlD4szhCoqxoCdF58Wg192Mne6dK6doimjNL_cL4tpW_KIZlYOt-baKUeizYc3rvOtcb3R00yMurN4-KBlV0yT6b7RfHt_buvlx8XV9cf1perq4VmhPULxAlrILOUI6IUUdYgAnFlaUUxtKqmtqkIYLiW1AKgEdPQAtioSnHDANX4onh-8N13IYlpD0nkDaAKkxpWmVgfiCbIrdhHt5PxjwjSiZtCiK2QMc_cGSEZbTBEDaScVwxaqZhWoLa5saJUyez1duo2qJ1pdB47ym5mOv_i3Ua04ZdA9TjWeJhXk0EMPweTerFzSecVSm_CkAQjnGPOEc_ki3_Iu4ebqFbm8ztvQ26rR0-xqhjmhNCbrss7qHw1Zud0zox1uT4TvJ4JMtOb330rh5TE-svn_2evv8_Zlyfsxsiu36TQDb0LPs3B6gDqGFKKxt7uGAIxRv64DTFGXkyRz7Jnp__nVnTMOP4LW8D7Kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292435914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Yu, Hong ; Liu, Feifan ; Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</creator><contributor>Wong, Kelvin Kian Loong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hong ; Liu, Feifan ; Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli ; Wong, Kelvin Kian Loong</creatorcontrib><description>Figures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has made it difficult to access figures. Therefore, we are developing an intelligent figure search engine (http://figuresearch.askhermes.org). Existing research in figure search treats each figure equally, but we introduce a novel concept of "figure ranking": figures appearing in a full-text biomedical article can be ranked by their contribution to the knowledge discovery.
We empirically validated the hypothesis of figure ranking with over 100 bioscience researchers, and then developed unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approaches to automatically rank figures. Evaluating on a collection of 202 full-text articles in which authors have ranked the figures based on importance, our best system achieved a weighted error rate of 0.2, which is significantly better than several other baseline systems we explored. We further explored a user interfacing application in which we built novel user interfaces (UIs) incorporating figure ranking, allowing bioscience researchers to efficiently access important figures. Our evaluation results show that 92% of the bioscience researchers prefer as the top two choices the user interfaces in which the most important figures are enlarged. With our automatic figure ranking NLP system, bioscience researchers preferred the UIs in which the most important figures were predicted by our NLP system than the UIs in which the most important figures were randomly assigned. In addition, our results show that there was no statistical difference in bioscience researchers' preference in the UIs generated by automatic figure ranking and UIs by human ranking annotation.
The evaluation results conclude that automatic figure ranking and user interfacing as we reported in this study can be fully implemented in online publishing. The novel user interface integrated with the automatic figure ranking system provides a more efficient and robust way to access scientific information in the biomedical domain, which will further enhance our existing figure search engine to better facilitate accessing figures of interest for bioscientists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012983</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20949102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Algorithms ; Annotations ; Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Biotechnology ; Classification ; Computational Biology/Genomics ; Computational Biology/Literature Analysis ; Computer engineering ; Computer science ; Computer Science/Applications ; Computer Science/Information Technology ; Electrical engineering ; Evaluation ; Gene expression ; Health informatics ; Hypotheses ; Hypothesis testing ; Information processing ; Interfaces ; Machine translation ; Medical research ; Models, Theoretical ; Natural language processing ; Ranking ; Ratings & rankings ; Researchers ; Search engines ; Searching ; User interface ; User interfaces ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e12983-e12983</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2010 Yu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Yu et al. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-2857d17f6825bb5bfe25134f64631fb96fd450739a6f00c27c1f01db4b8e706c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1292435914/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1292435914?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wong, Kelvin Kian Loong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Figures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has made it difficult to access figures. Therefore, we are developing an intelligent figure search engine (http://figuresearch.askhermes.org). Existing research in figure search treats each figure equally, but we introduce a novel concept of "figure ranking": figures appearing in a full-text biomedical article can be ranked by their contribution to the knowledge discovery.
We empirically validated the hypothesis of figure ranking with over 100 bioscience researchers, and then developed unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approaches to automatically rank figures. Evaluating on a collection of 202 full-text articles in which authors have ranked the figures based on importance, our best system achieved a weighted error rate of 0.2, which is significantly better than several other baseline systems we explored. We further explored a user interfacing application in which we built novel user interfaces (UIs) incorporating figure ranking, allowing bioscience researchers to efficiently access important figures. Our evaluation results show that 92% of the bioscience researchers prefer as the top two choices the user interfaces in which the most important figures are enlarged. With our automatic figure ranking NLP system, bioscience researchers preferred the UIs in which the most important figures were predicted by our NLP system than the UIs in which the most important figures were randomly assigned. In addition, our results show that there was no statistical difference in bioscience researchers' preference in the UIs generated by automatic figure ranking and UIs by human ranking annotation.
The evaluation results conclude that automatic figure ranking and user interfacing as we reported in this study can be fully implemented in online publishing. The novel user interface integrated with the automatic figure ranking system provides a more efficient and robust way to access scientific information in the biomedical domain, which will further enhance our existing figure search engine to better facilitate accessing figures of interest for bioscientists.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Annotations</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Genomics</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Literature Analysis</subject><subject>Computer engineering</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Computer Science/Applications</subject><subject>Computer Science/Information Technology</subject><subject>Electrical engineering</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Health informatics</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Machine translation</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>User interface</subject><subject>User interfaces</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuL1DAUxoso7rr6H4gWBMWHGXNpLn0RhsXL4MKCt9eQpEknYycZk1b0vzfd6SxT2QfpQ9vT3_ednNOvKJ5CsISYwTfbMEQvu-U-eLMEAKKa43vFOawxWlAE8P2T57PiUUpbAAjmlD4szhCoqxoCdF58Wg192Mne6dK6doimjNL_cL4tpW_KIZlYOt-baKUeizYc3rvOtcb3R00yMurN4-KBlV0yT6b7RfHt_buvlx8XV9cf1perq4VmhPULxAlrILOUI6IUUdYgAnFlaUUxtKqmtqkIYLiW1AKgEdPQAtioSnHDANX4onh-8N13IYlpD0nkDaAKkxpWmVgfiCbIrdhHt5PxjwjSiZtCiK2QMc_cGSEZbTBEDaScVwxaqZhWoLa5saJUyez1duo2qJ1pdB47ym5mOv_i3Ua04ZdA9TjWeJhXk0EMPweTerFzSecVSm_CkAQjnGPOEc_ki3_Iu4ebqFbm8ztvQ26rR0-xqhjmhNCbrss7qHw1Zud0zox1uT4TvJ4JMtOb330rh5TE-svn_2evv8_Zlyfsxsiu36TQDb0LPs3B6gDqGFKKxt7uGAIxRv64DTFGXkyRz7Jnp__nVnTMOP4LW8D7Kw</recordid><startdate>20101007</startdate><enddate>20101007</enddate><creator>Yu, Hong</creator><creator>Liu, Feifan</creator><creator>Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101007</creationdate><title>Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search</title><author>Yu, Hong ; Liu, Feifan ; Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-2857d17f6825bb5bfe25134f64631fb96fd450739a6f00c27c1f01db4b8e706c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Annotations</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Genomics</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Literature Analysis</topic><topic>Computer engineering</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Computer Science/Applications</topic><topic>Computer Science/Information Technology</topic><topic>Electrical engineering</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Health informatics</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Machine translation</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>User interface</topic><topic>User interfaces</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Hong</au><au>Liu, Feifan</au><au>Ramesh, Balaji Polepalli</au><au>Wong, Kelvin Kian Loong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2010-10-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e12983</spage><epage>e12983</epage><pages>e12983-e12983</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Figures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has made it difficult to access figures. Therefore, we are developing an intelligent figure search engine (http://figuresearch.askhermes.org). Existing research in figure search treats each figure equally, but we introduce a novel concept of "figure ranking": figures appearing in a full-text biomedical article can be ranked by their contribution to the knowledge discovery.
We empirically validated the hypothesis of figure ranking with over 100 bioscience researchers, and then developed unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approaches to automatically rank figures. Evaluating on a collection of 202 full-text articles in which authors have ranked the figures based on importance, our best system achieved a weighted error rate of 0.2, which is significantly better than several other baseline systems we explored. We further explored a user interfacing application in which we built novel user interfaces (UIs) incorporating figure ranking, allowing bioscience researchers to efficiently access important figures. Our evaluation results show that 92% of the bioscience researchers prefer as the top two choices the user interfaces in which the most important figures are enlarged. With our automatic figure ranking NLP system, bioscience researchers preferred the UIs in which the most important figures were predicted by our NLP system than the UIs in which the most important figures were randomly assigned. In addition, our results show that there was no statistical difference in bioscience researchers' preference in the UIs generated by automatic figure ranking and UIs by human ranking annotation.
The evaluation results conclude that automatic figure ranking and user interfacing as we reported in this study can be fully implemented in online publishing. The novel user interface integrated with the automatic figure ranking system provides a more efficient and robust way to access scientific information in the biomedical domain, which will further enhance our existing figure search engine to better facilitate accessing figures of interest for bioscientists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>20949102</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0012983</doi><tpages>e12983</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2010-10, Vol.5 (10), p.e12983-e12983 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1292435914 |
source | PubMed (Medline); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Access to information Algorithms Annotations Artificial intelligence Automation Biotechnology Classification Computational Biology/Genomics Computational Biology/Literature Analysis Computer engineering Computer science Computer Science/Applications Computer Science/Information Technology Electrical engineering Evaluation Gene expression Health informatics Hypotheses Hypothesis testing Information processing Interfaces Machine translation Medical research Models, Theoretical Natural language processing Ranking Ratings & rankings Researchers Search engines Searching User interface User interfaces User-Computer Interface |
title | Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A16%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20figure%20ranking%20and%20user%20interfacing%20for%20intelligent%20figure%20search&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yu,%20Hong&rft.date=2010-10-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e12983&rft.epage=e12983&rft.pages=e12983-e12983&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0012983&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA473855644%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-2857d17f6825bb5bfe25134f64631fb96fd450739a6f00c27c1f01db4b8e706c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292435914&rft_id=info:pmid/20949102&rft_galeid=A473855644&rfr_iscdi=true |