Faces in places: humans and machines make similar face detection errors

• Published in: PloS one 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e25373-e25373
• Main Authors: 't Hart, Bernard Marius, Abresch, Tilman Gerrit Jakob, Einhäuser, Wolfgang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Biology; Cameras; Coding; Color; Computer applications; Computer Science; Computer vision; Computers; Computing time; Digital cameras; Experiments; Eye; Eye Movements; Face; Face - anatomy & histology; Face recognition; Female; Humans; Hypotheses; Illusions - physiology; Machine vision; Male; Photic Stimulation; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Stimuli; Trends; Visual Perception - physiology; Visual stimuli; Visual system; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025373

The human visual system seems to be particularly efficient at detecting faces. This efficiency sometimes comes at the cost of wrongfully seeing faces in arbitrary patterns, including famous examples such as a rock configuration on Mars or a toast's roast patterns. In machine vision, face detection has made considerable progress and has become a standard feature of many digital cameras. The arguably most wide-spread algorithm for such applications ("Viola-Jones" algorithm) achieves high detection rates at high computational efficiency. To what extent do the patterns that the algorithm mistakenly classifies as faces also fool humans? We selected three kinds of stimuli from real-life, first-person perspective movies based on the algorithm's output: correct detections ("real faces"), false positives ("illusory faces") and correctly rejected locations ("non faces"). Observers were shown pairs of these for 20 ms and had to direct their gaze to the location of the face. We found that illusory faces were mistaken for faces more frequently than non faces. In addition, rotation of the real face yielded more errors, while rotation of the illusory face yielded fewer errors. Using colored stimuli increases overall performance, but does not change the pattern of results. When replacing the eye movement by a manual response, however, the preference for illusory faces over non faces disappeared. Taken together, our data show that humans make similar face-detection errors as the Viola-Jones algorithm, when directing their gaze to briefly presented stimuli. In particular, the relative spatial arrangement of oriented filters seems of relevance. This suggests that efficient face detection in humans is likely to be pre-attentive and based on rather simple features as those encoded in the early visual system.