Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart

The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26086-e26086
Main Authors: Bargielowski, Irka, Alphey, Luke, Koella, Jacob C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aedes - genetics
Aedes - physiology
Aedes aegypti
Animal reproduction
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
Antibiotics
Aquatic insects
Binding sites
Biology
Body Size
Ceratitis capitata
Courtship
Culicidae
Diptera
Economic aspects
Female
Females
Gene expression
Genetic engineering
Genetic modification
Genetically modified organisms
Genetics
Gryllodes supplicans
Insect control
Insects
Insemination - physiology
Longevity - physiology
Low cost
Male
Males
Mating
Medicine
Mosquitoes
Orthoptera
Positive feedback
Rest - physiology
Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology
Sperm
Tropical diseases
Vectors (Biology)
Zoology
Zoonoses
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3
container_end_page e26086
container_issue 10
container_start_page e26086
container_title PloS one
container_volume 6
creator Bargielowski, Irka
Alphey, Luke
Koella, Jacob C
description The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0026086
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1309311062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A476868846</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d6f3077f39694c19b197c1ad34569d78</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A476868846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLguLDjEnTJs2LMAxeBhYGvOFbSHPpZEmTbpOq8wX83Gac7jKVfZA85HDO7_yTnJyTZU8hWEJE4JsrPw6O22XvnVoCUGBQ43vZOaSoWOACoPsn9ln2KIQrACpUY_wwOysKUBQVrM-z32sfYu513vFoXJtzJ3PjguqMSw7vcsF7LkzcHxiet8qpaAS3dp93XhptlExGuB5N9PlKSRVyrtp9H02-_V5BtMqF73o-JCwBJob8p7HJ3vcqRUYX1ZCi8XH2QHMb1JNpv8i-vn_3Zf1xcbn9sFmvLhcCUxgXTdVIDTSphFa6lJo3sqakBnVVoEpBBGVJMeQQSF5KKbluIChIzSsqNG6IQhfZ86Nub31gUwkDgwhQBCHARSI2R0J6fsX6wXR82DPPDfvr8EPL0n2NsIpJrBEgRCOKaSkgbSAlAnKJygpTSeqk9XY6bWw6JYVyceB2JjqPOLNjrf_BEKQQEpgEXk0Cg78eVYisM0Eoa7lTfgyMAoARSWAiX_xD3v24iWp5ur9x2qdjxUGTrUqCa1zXJU7U8g4qLZnaQqR20yb5ZwmvZwmJiepXbPkYAtt8_vT_7PbbnH15wu4Ut3EXvB0PjRnmYHkExeBDGJS-rTEE7DAtN9Vgh2lh07SktGen_3ObdDMe6A_OKBEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1309311062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bargielowski, Irka ; Alphey, Luke ; Koella, Jacob C</creator><contributor>Langsley, Gordon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bargielowski, Irka ; Alphey, Luke ; Koella, Jacob C ; Langsley, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22022518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aedes - genetics ; Aedes - physiology ; Aedes aegypti ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Animals, Genetically Modified ; Antibiotics ; Aquatic insects ; Binding sites ; Biology ; Body Size ; Ceratitis capitata ; Courtship ; Culicidae ; Diptera ; Economic aspects ; Female ; Females ; Gene expression ; Genetic engineering ; Genetic modification ; Genetically modified organisms ; Genetics ; Gryllodes supplicans ; Insect control ; Insects ; Insemination - physiology ; Longevity - physiology ; Low cost ; Male ; Males ; Mating ; Medicine ; Mosquitoes ; Orthoptera ; Positive feedback ; Rest - physiology ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Sperm ; Tropical diseases ; Vectors (Biology) ; Zoology ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26086-e26086</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2011 Bargielowski et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Bargielowski et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1309311062/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1309311062?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Langsley, Gordon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bargielowski, Irka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alphey, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koella, Jacob C</creatorcontrib><title>Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.</description><subject>Aedes - genetics</subject><subject>Aedes - physiology</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Gryllodes supplicans</subject><subject>Insect control</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Insemination - physiology</subject><subject>Longevity - physiology</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Orthoptera</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><subject>Rest - physiology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Vectors (Biology)</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DUQLguLDjEnTJs2LMAxeBhYGvOFbSHPpZEmTbpOq8wX83Gac7jKVfZA85HDO7_yTnJyTZU8hWEJE4JsrPw6O22XvnVoCUGBQ43vZOaSoWOACoPsn9ln2KIQrACpUY_wwOysKUBQVrM-z32sfYu513vFoXJtzJ3PjguqMSw7vcsF7LkzcHxiet8qpaAS3dp93XhptlExGuB5N9PlKSRVyrtp9H02-_V5BtMqF73o-JCwBJob8p7HJ3vcqRUYX1ZCi8XH2QHMb1JNpv8i-vn_3Zf1xcbn9sFmvLhcCUxgXTdVIDTSphFa6lJo3sqakBnVVoEpBBGVJMeQQSF5KKbluIChIzSsqNG6IQhfZ86Nub31gUwkDgwhQBCHARSI2R0J6fsX6wXR82DPPDfvr8EPL0n2NsIpJrBEgRCOKaSkgbSAlAnKJygpTSeqk9XY6bWw6JYVyceB2JjqPOLNjrf_BEKQQEpgEXk0Cg78eVYisM0Eoa7lTfgyMAoARSWAiX_xD3v24iWp5ur9x2qdjxUGTrUqCa1zXJU7U8g4qLZnaQqR20yb5ZwmvZwmJiepXbPkYAtt8_vT_7PbbnH15wu4Ut3EXvB0PjRnmYHkExeBDGJS-rTEE7DAtN9Vgh2lh07SktGen_3ObdDMe6A_OKBEg</recordid><startdate>20111011</startdate><enddate>20111011</enddate><creator>Bargielowski, Irka</creator><creator>Alphey, Luke</creator><creator>Koella, Jacob C</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111011</creationdate><title>Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart</title><author>Bargielowski, Irka ; Alphey, Luke ; Koella, Jacob C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aedes - genetics</topic><topic>Aedes - physiology</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Gryllodes supplicans</topic><topic>Insect control</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Insemination - physiology</topic><topic>Longevity - physiology</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Orthoptera</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><topic>Rest - physiology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Vectors (Biology)</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bargielowski, Irka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alphey, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koella, Jacob C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bargielowski, Irka</au><au>Alphey, Luke</au><au>Koella, Jacob C</au><au>Langsley, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2011-10-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e26086</spage><epage>e26086</epage><pages>e26086-e26086</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The idea of implementing genetics-based insect control strategies modelled on the traditional SIT is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper we compare a genetically modified line of Aedes aegypti carrying a tetracycline repressible, lethal positive feedback system (OX513A) with its wild type counterpart with respect to their insemination capacities and the cost of courtship and mating. Genetically modified males inseminated just over half as many females as the wild type males during their lifetime. Providing days of rest from mating had no significant effect on the total number of females inseminated by males of either line, but it did increase their longevity. Producing sperm had a low cost in terms of energy investment; the cost of transferring this sperm to a receptive female was much higher. Continued mating attempts with refractory females suggest that males could not identify refractory females before investing substantial energy in courtship. Although over a lifetime OX513A males inseminated fewer females, the number of females inseminated over the first three days, was similar between males of the two lines, suggesting that the identified cost of RIDL may have little impact on the outcome of SIT-based control programmes with frequent releases of the genetically modified males.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22022518</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0026086</doi><tpages>e26086</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2011-10, Vol.6 (10), p.e26086-e26086
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1309311062
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central
subjects Aedes - genetics
Aedes - physiology
Aedes aegypti
Animal reproduction
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified
Antibiotics
Aquatic insects
Binding sites
Biology
Body Size
Ceratitis capitata
Courtship
Culicidae
Diptera
Economic aspects
Female
Females
Gene expression
Genetic engineering
Genetic modification
Genetically modified organisms
Genetics
Gryllodes supplicans
Insect control
Insects
Insemination - physiology
Longevity - physiology
Low cost
Male
Males
Mating
Medicine
Mosquitoes
Orthoptera
Positive feedback
Rest - physiology
Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology
Sperm
Tropical diseases
Vectors (Biology)
Zoology
Zoonoses
title Cost of mating and insemination capacity of a genetically modified mosquito Aedes aegypti OX513A compared to its wild type counterpart
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20of%20mating%20and%20insemination%20capacity%20of%20a%20genetically%20modified%20mosquito%20Aedes%20aegypti%20OX513A%20compared%20to%20its%20wild%20type%20counterpart&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bargielowski,%20Irka&rft.date=2011-10-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e26086&rft.epage=e26086&rft.pages=e26086-e26086&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026086&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA476868846%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-b5bdf0f75cfef4dfabd8978085235e131d4961a10da4dddafb10278a59cf6b7e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1309311062&rft_id=info:pmid/22022518&rft_galeid=A476868846&rfr_iscdi=true